Journals / Chaos Theory and Applications / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A Comparative Proposal on Learning the Chaos to Understand the Environment

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, they should determine strategies by developing various scenarios against unforeseen threats, and they should consider environmental factors while doing these.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Towards the end of the twentieth century, radical changes have taken place within the framework of strategic management and organization-environment relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This situation makes it difficult for organizations aiming to live an eternal life to continue their lives and accelerates the occurrence of organizational death.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, they should determine strategies by developing various scenarios against unforeseen threats, and they should consider environmental factors while doing these.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Towards the end of the twentieth century, radical changes have taken place within the framework of strategic management and organization-environment relationship. Technology, speed, competition and globalization factors have rapidly modified the environmental dynamics in the organization environment relationship. In today’s chaotic world, the effects of the crisis and environmental uncertainties have spread rapidly and widely not only in narrow area but all over the world. This situation makes it difficult for organizations aiming to live an eternal life to continue their lives and accelerates the occurrence of organizational death. In this context, Organizational Ecology and Chaos Theories have been emerging as guides in ensuring the sustainability of organizations. This study, it is aimed to draw a road map for organizations by making a comparison based on the suggestions and arguments of Organizational Ecology and Chaos Theories in order for organizations to have a more sustainable life. As a result of the evaluation, recommendations were made for learning to live with uncertainties and a correct action plan by developing sensors on the way to becoming a sustainable organization, based on the dynamics of the future. At this point, organizations need to have a flexible and agile structure and develop early warning systems so that they can leave the foggy and unpredictable environment created by the chaotic atmosphere with minimum damage and seize the new opportunities that arise. In addition, they should determine strategies by developing various scenarios against unforeseen threats, and they should consider environmental factors while doing these.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arıcıoğlu, M. A., Berk, O. N. (2022). A Comparative Proposal on Learning the Chaos to Understand the Environment. Chaos Theory and Applications, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/473715

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbott, K. W., J. F. Green, and R. O. Keohane, 2016 Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization 70: 247–277.
  2. Adorno, T.W. and M. Horkheimer, 2010 Aydınlanmanın diyalekti ği: felsefi fragmanlar. Kabalcı Yayınları, çev: O˘guz Özügül 1. Altinay, L. and H. E. Arici, 2021 Transformation of the hospitality services marketing structure: a chaos theory perspective. Journal of Services Marketing. Arıcıoglu, M. A., B. Erer, and N. Gülnar, 2021 A known innovation for strategy: A study on chaos. In Financial Strategies in Competitive Markets, pp. 179–191,
  3. Springer. Aricioglu, M. A. and H. Ç. Karabiyik, 2019 Örgütlerin geleceğine bir önerme olarak kaos teorisi ve kaos olgusunu anlamak. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi 3: 145–156.
  4. Baum, J. A., 1999 Organizational ecology. Studying organization: Theory and method pp. 71–108.
  5. Baum, J. A. and C. Oliver, 1991 Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative science quarterly pp. 187–218.
  6. Bayramoglu, G., 2016 Karmaşıklık paradigmasi ışığında örgüt teorilerinin yeniden de˘ğerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi pp. 49–63.
  7. Chamberlain, L., 1995 Strange attractors in patterns of family interaction. D’aveni, R. A., 2010 Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster. Doherty, N. and N. Delener, 2001 Chaos theory: Marketing & management implications. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 9: 66–75.
  8. Economist, E., 2009 Organisational agility: How business can survive and thrive in turbulent times. The Economist pp. 1–27.
  9. Farazmand, A., 2003 Chaos and transformation theories: A theoretical analysis with implications for organization theory and public management. Public Organization Review 3: 339–372.
  10. Fitzgerald, L. A. and F. M. van Eijnatten, 2002 Reflections: Chaos in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Gilad, B., 2003 Early warning: Using competitive intelligence to anticipate market shifts, control risk, and create powerful strategies. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Gleick, J., 1997 Kaos: Yeni bir bilim teorisi, çev. Fikret Üçkan, TÜB˙ITAK, Ankara.
  11. Gleick, J., 2005 Kaos: Yeni bir bilim teorisi, çev. Fikret Üçkan, TÜB˙ITAK, Ankara.
  12. Grandinetti, R., 2018 Is organizational evolution darwinian and/or lamarckian? International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Habermas, J. and C. A. Kanat, 1997 Bilgi ve insansal ilgiler. Küyerel Yayınları.
  13. Hancerlioglu, O., 1995 Dört bin yıllık düşünce, sanat ve bilim tarihi