Journals / Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Looking for the Gaze: The Case of Humiliation in the Digital Era

Pages
183–203
Publication Date
2014-07-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will explore how the internet has redefined individuals’ representations of self, while exposing them to the misappropriation of their image.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The internet constitutes a virtual “place” for sociability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is a platform for interactions based on reciprocal and dialectic exchange between “being seen by others” and “seeing others”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will explore how the internet has redefined individuals’ representations of self, while exposing them to the misappropriation of their image.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bakış · Mobbing · İnternet

Abstract

The internet constitutes a virtual “place” for sociability. It is a platform for interactions based on reciprocal and dialectic exchange between “being seen by others” and “seeing others”. As new technologies emerge, ways of viewing are revised: The main innovation of the internet has been, in ordinary life as in the media, seeing, hearing and showing everything with the individual at the center of permanent interactions established in a virtual world that makes it unseen by the naked eye. But visibility is a trap: In attempting to a part of the virtual world through self-exposition, individuals expose themselves to potential sources of humiliation. This article will explore how the internet has redefined individuals’ representations of self, while exposing them to the misappropriation of their image.

Özet

The internet constitutes a virtual “place” for sociability. It is a platform for interactions based on reciprocal and dialectic exchange between “being seen by others” and “seeing others”. As new technologies emerge, ways of viewing are revised: The main innovation of the internet has been, in ordinary life as in the media, seeing, hearing and showing everything with the individual at the center of permanent interactions established in a virtual world that makes it unseen by the naked eye. But visibility is a trap: In attempting to a part of the virtual world through self-exposition, individuals expose themselves to potential sources of humiliation. This article will explore how the internet has redefined individuals’ representations of self, while exposing them to the misappropriation of their image.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLMAÇ, J. (2014). Looking for the Gaze: The Case of Humiliation in the Digital Era. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 183–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/4737

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. ANSART, P. (2006) Les Humiliations Politiques. In DELOYE, Y. & HAROCHE, C. (eds.).Lesentiment d’humiliation. In Press.
  2. BASTARD, I. (2012) De la Visibilité à L’attention: Les Musiciens Sur Internet. Réseaux. 5 (175). p. 19-42.
  3. BAUDRILLARD, J. (1987) Au-delà du Vrai et du Faux, Ou le Malin Génie de L’image. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie. vol. LXXXII. p.140-141. BÉLIARD, A. (2009)
  4. Pseudos, Avatars et Bannières: La Mise en Dcène des Fans. Étude d’un Forum de Fans de la Série Télévisée Prison Break (enquête). Terrains & Travaux. 1 (15). p. 191-212.
  5. BELHOMME, L. (2010) Interview with Serge Tisseron. L’identité et les Liens Transformés par les Nouvelles Technologies. Cahiers de Psychologie Clinique. 2 (35). BENJAMIN, W. (1991) L’œuvre d’art à L’époque de sa Reproduction Mécanisée. Écrits Français. Paris: Gallimard. BOËTON, M. (2013) La génération Y, une Classe D’âge Façonnée par le Net. Études. 7 Tome 419. p.31- 41. DAGNAUD, M. (2013) Génération Y: Les Jeunes et les Réseaux Sociaux, de la Dérision à la ubversion. Les Presses de Sciences Po. DILMAÇ, J. A. (will be published in Fall 2014) If looks could kill… The case of Humiliation in Digital Era. European Journal of Research on Education. 6 pages. DILMAÇ, J. A. (will be published in Fall 2014) Représentatiton et Mise en Scène de soi sur Internet: le cas de la Cyberhumilation. Cahiers Interdiciplinaires de la Recherche en Communication AudioVisuelle. 17 pages. DUBET, F. (1991) Les Lycéens. Le Seuil. ELLISON, R. (1991) Invisible Man. Penguin Classics. ENRIQUEZ, E. (2006) L’autre Comme Objet de la Violence Humiliante. In DELOYE, Y. & HAROCHE C (eds.). Le Sentiment D’humiliation. In Press.
  6. FOUCAULT, M. (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin. FREUD, S. (2012) On Narcissism: An Introduction. Karnac Books. GEORGES, F. (2012) A l’image de l’Homme: Cyborgs, Avatars, Identités Numériques. Le Temps des Médias. 1(18). p. 136-147.
  7. GOFFMAN, E. (1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin. GOZLAN, A. and MASSON C. (2013) Le théâtre de Facebook: Réflexion Autour des Enjeux Psychiques Pour L’adolescent. Adolescence, 2 (84). p.471- 481. HAROCHE, C. (2008) L’avenir du Sensible. Les Sens et les Sentiments en Question. Puf. HAROCHE, C. (2006) L’appauvrissement Intérieur de L’individu Dans le Capitalisme Contemporain. In Y. DELOYE & C. HAROCHE (eds.). Le Sentiment D’humiliation. In Press, p.15-35.
  8. HERTZ, M. F., DONATO, I. & WRIGHT, J. (2013) The Relationship Between Youth Involvement in