Journals / Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Determining the rate and risk factors of febrile morbidity after pelvic gynecologic operations

Pelvik jinekolojik operasyon sonrası ateş (Febril morbidite) görülme durumu ve etkileyen faktörlerin irdelenmesi

Pages
121–125
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As infections are responsible for more than half of febrile morbidity, infection site should be researched after first 24 hours.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Among postgynecologic surgery morbid events, febrile morbidity is the most commonly reported adverse event.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this report, we aimed to identify the rate of febrile morbidity after pelvic gynecologic operations and the risk factors .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As infections are responsible for more than half of febrile morbidity, infection site should be researched after first 24 hours.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Among postgynecologic surgery morbid events, febrile morbidity is the most commonly reported adverse event. In this report, we aimed to identify the rate of febrile morbidity after pelvic gynecologic operations and the risk factors . The project was done by Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology Department of Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine from the patients who applied with benign and malign gynecologic diseases and was accepted to the hospital to be operated, the ones who have had pelvic operation, no peroperative intestinal trauma, no intraabdominal tuberculosis, not been operated for pelvic abscess and who do not take immunosuppressive drugs. A total of 265 cases have been taken under consideration. 8.7 % of the cases were defined as post¬operative febril morbidity. Patological laboratory findings were detected in 51.1 % of cases that developed febrile morbidity. Of these patients 3 had bacteriemia, 5 had urinary infection, 1 had pulmonary infection and the remaining 3 had pelvic infection source. Older age (> 45), long operation duration, peroperative blood transfusion, drain, nasogastric catheter.were the risk factors that were found statistically significant. The approach to febrile morbidity should be based on the infection rates of the clinic. As infections are responsible for more than half of febrile morbidity, infection site should be researched after first 24 hours.

Özet

Postoperatif ateş jinekolojik operasyon sonrası hastanede yatan bireylerin sağlığını tehdit eden ve en sık karşılaşılan komplikasyon olarak bilinir. Ateşin jinekolojik operasyon sonrası görülme insidansı % 5 ile % 46 arasında değişmektedir. Ateş postoperatif infeksiyonun ilk belirtisi sayılmaktadır. Ancak her postoperatif ateş yükselmesi febril morbidite değildir. Çalışmamıza Ekim 2001-Mayıs 2002 tarihleri arasında İstanbul Üniversitesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı'nda selim ve habis jinekolojik hastalık nedeni ile başvuran ve hastaneye yatırılarak öpere edilen 265 olgu dahil edildi. Jinekolojik operasyon geçiren 265 olgunun 23'ünde (% 8.7) postoperatif febril morbidite saptandı. Febril morbidite olarak tanımlanan olguların klinik değerlendirme sonucunda % 51.1'inde (12/23) infeksiyon açısından patolojik bulgu saptandı, 3 olguda bakteriyemi, 5 olguda üriner infeksiyon, 1 olguda akciğer infeksiyonu ve 3 olguda da pelvik infeksiyon odağı mevcuttu. Febril morbidite saptanan ve saptanmayan olgular arasında yaş, operasyon süresi, per-operatif kan transfüzyonu, dren, nazogastrik sonda açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olduğu gözlendi. Fakat menopoz durumu, VKİ, sigara kullanımı, peroperatif komplikasyon, postoperatif kan transfüzyonu açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark omadığı gözlendi. Sonuç olarak, postoperatif ateşli hastalarda rutin laboratuar incelemenin maliyet-fayda açısından yarar sağlamadığı savunulsa da bizim çalışmamızda hastaların yaklaşık yarısında infeksiyöz patoloji saptanmıştır. İnfeksiyon oranlarının her klinikten kliniğe değiştiği göz önüne alınırsa bizim kendi kliniğimizde febril morbidite hastalarına daha hassas yaklaşılması gerektiği sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNCÜL, M., DEMİRKIRAN, F., KÖSEBAY, D., MÜDÜROĞLU, M., ERYILMAZ, Y. H. (2022). Determining the rate and risk factors of febrile morbidity after pelvic gynecologic operations. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 121–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/473403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Engoren M.Lack of association between atelectasis and fever. Chest 1995; 7: 81 -84. 2.Root RK, Petersdorf RG: Alterations in body temperature. In Harrison's of medicine. Twelfth edition. 1991; 125-137. 3.Hemsell DL, Reisch J, Nobles B, Hemsell RA, Prevention of major infection after elective abdominal hysterectomy: Individual determination required. Am J. Obstetric Gynecology 1993;147: 520-528. 4. Iverson RE, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash EG: Routine hematocrit after elective gynecolic surgery. Gynecol obstet 2000; 58: 847-845. 5. Harris WJ: Complications of Hysterectomy. Clin Obstetric Gynecology. 1997; 40: 928-938 6.Freischlag J, Busuttil RW: The value of postoperative fever evaluation. Surgery 1983; 94; 358-363. 7.Goldstein CC, McNally,Krivak MTC and Alagöz T: Conservative management of isolated posthysterec-tomy fever. J of Reproductive Medicine 2000; 45: 572-576. 8.Muzii L, Angioli Rv Zullo MA., Calcagno M., Panici PB.: Bowel preparation for gynecological surgery. Hematol Oncol, 2003; 48: 311 -315. 9.Wexler HM., Molitoris E., Molitoris D., Finegold SM., In vitro activity of HMR 3004 (RU 64004) against 502 strains of anaerobic bacteria. Clin Microbiology, 1999; 5: 65-68. 10.Rock JA, Jones HW III: Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. Ninth Edition. 2003; 196-197. 11.Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:841 -848. 12.Hemsell DL. Prophylactic antibiotic in gynecologic and obstetric surgery. Rev Infect Dis 1991;16:821 -841. 13.Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Cruickshank C, Story E, Ethridge D, Lapane K. Risk factors for febrile morbidity after hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol 2004;103: 86-91. 14.Fanning J, Neuhoff RA, Brewer JE, etal. Frequency and yield of postoperative fever evaluation. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998; 6: 252. 15.Schwandt A, Andrews SJ, Fanning J. Prospective analysis of a fever evaluation algoritm after major gnecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1066. 16.Jensen JK, Lucci JA 3rd, DiSaia PJ, Mnetta A, Berman ML. To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 51: 46-49. 17. Shackelford PD, Hoffman MK, Davies MF, Kaminski PF. Predictive value for infection of febrile morbidity after vaginal surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 98: 928-931.