Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Shear wave elastography of placenta: in vivo quantitation of placental elasticity in preeclampsia

Pages
202–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SWE appears to be an assistive diagnostic tech-nique for placenta evaluation in preeclampsia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the utility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing the placenta in preeclampsia disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODSA total of 50 pregnant women in the second or third trimes-ter (23 preeclampsia patients and 27 healthy control sub-jects) were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SWE appears to be an assistive diagnostic tech-nique for placenta evaluation in preeclampsia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the utility of shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing the placenta in preeclampsia disease. METHODSA total of 50 pregnant women in the second or third trimes-ter (23 preeclampsia patients and 27 healthy control sub-jects) were enrolled in the study. Obstetrical grayscale and Doppler ultrasonography, SWE findings of placenta, and pre-natal/postnatal clinical data were analyzed and the best SWE cutoff value which represents the diagnosis of preeclampsia was determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnos-tic accuracy of preeclampsia were calculated based on SWE measurements.RESULTSMean stiffness values were much higher in preeclamptic pla-centas in all regions and layers than in normal controls. The most significant difference was observed in the central pla-cental area facing the fetus where the umbilical cord inserts, with a median of 21 kPa (range, 3-71 kPa) for preeclampsia and 4 kPa (range, 1.5-14 kPa) for the control group (P < 0.01). The SWE data showed a moderate correlation with the uterine artery resistivity and pulsatility indices. The cutoff val-ue maximizing the accuracy of diagnosis was 7.35 kPa (area under curve, 0.895; 95% confidence interval, 0.791-0.998); sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 90%, 86%, 82%, 92%, and 88%, respectively.CONCLUSIONStiffness of the placenta is significantly higher in patients with preeclampsia. SWE appears to be an assistive diagnostic tech-nique for placenta evaluation in preeclampsia.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, F., KAYADİBİ, Y., YÜKSEL, M. A., ADALETLİ, İ., USTABAŞIOĞLU, F. E., ÖNCÜL, M., MADAZLI, R., YILMAZ, M. H., MİHMANLI, İ., KANTARCI, F. (2015). Shear wave elastography of placenta: in vivo quantitation of placental elasticity in preeclampsia. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 202–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/207707

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Xiong X, Buekens P, Pridjian G, Fraser WD. Pregnancy-induced hypertension and perinatal mortality. J Reprod Med 2007; 52:402-406.
  2. Brown MC, Best KE, Pearce MS, Waugh J, Robson SC, Bell R. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 28:1-19. [CrossRef] Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hy- pertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gy- necol 2009; 113:1299-1306. [CrossRef] Gupta LM, Gaston L, Chauhan SP. De- tection of fetal growth restriction with preterm severe preeclampsia: experience at two tertiary centers. Am J Perinatol 2008; 25:247-249. [CrossRef] Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ, et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1023-1032. [CrossRef] Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R104. [CrossRef] ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclamp- sia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gy- necol 2002; 99:159-167.
  3. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multi- national study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012; 262:435-449. [CrossRef] Frulio N, Trillaud H. Ultrasound elas- tography in liver. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94:515-534. [CrossRef] Botanlioglu H, Kantarci F, Kaynak G, et al. Shear wave elastography properties of vastus lateralis and vastus medialis obliquus mus- cles in normal subjects and female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42:659-666. [CrossRef] Li WJ, Wei ZT, Yan RL, Zhang YL. De- tection of placenta elasticity modulus by quantitative real-time shear wave im- aging. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:470-473.
  4. Sugitani M, Fujita Y, Yumoto Y, et al. A new method for measurement of placen- tal elasticity: Acoustic radiation force im- pulse imaging. Placenta 2013; 34:1009- 1013. [CrossRef] Dekker G, Sibai B. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001; 357:209-215. [CrossRef] Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-ec- lampsia. Lancet 2005; 365:785-799. [CrossRef] Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Hanssens M. The uterine spiral arteries in human preg- nancy: facts and controversies. Placenta 2006; 27:939-958. [CrossRef] Devisme L, Merlot B, Ego A, Houfflin-De- barge V, Deruelle P, Subtil D. A case-con- trol study of placental