SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Prediction of Methane, Water and Ice Properties for Numerical Gas Hydrate Simulations

Şükrü MEREY
Pages
177–186
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Density,viscosity, enthalpy, internal energy and thermal conductivity of water andmethane calculated with the Matlab codes in this study, National Institute ofStandards and Technology were compared, and the reliability of waterprop.m,gasprop.m and iceprop.m was proved.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gashydrates are considered as near-future potential energy resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the lackof gas production data from gas hydrate reservoirs, numerical simulations arevery important to make production predictions for both experimental studies andfield production trials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Density,viscosity, enthalpy, internal energy and thermal conductivity of water andmethane calculated with the Matlab codes in this study, National Institute ofStandards and Technology were compared, and the reliability of waterprop.m,gasprop.m and iceprop.m was proved.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Gashydrates are considered as near-future potential energy resources. Due to the lackof gas production data from gas hydrate reservoirs, numerical simulations arevery important to make production predictions for both experimental studies andfield production trials. Methane and water flow together when gas hydratesdissociate inside the sediments. Hence, many parameters of methane and watersuch as density, viscosity, enthalpy, internal energy and thermal conductivityshould be calculated at different pressure and temperature values duringnon-isothermal numerical gas production simulations from gas hydratereservoirs. As a solid phase, ice might exist in the pores due to theendothermic dissociation of gas hydrates. For this reason, water, methane, iceproperties as a function of temperature and pressure are estimated by the Matlabcodes written in this study: waterprop.m, gasprop.m, and iceprop.m. Density,viscosity, enthalpy, internal energy and thermal conductivity of water andmethane calculated with the Matlab codes in this study, National Institute ofStandards and Technology were compared, and the reliability of waterprop.m,gasprop.m and iceprop.m was proved.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEREY, Ş. (2022). Prediction of Methane, Water and Ice Properties for Numerical Gas Hydrate Simulations. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 177–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/472226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Max, MD, Johnson, AH, Exploration and production of oceanic natural gas hydrate; Springer Nature: Switzerland, 2016.
  2. Koh, CA, Sloan, ED, Sum, AK, Unconventional energy sources: gas hydrates. In: Ginley DS, Cahen D (ed) Fundamentals of materials for energy and environmental sustainability, Cambridge University Press and Materials Research Society, Cambridge, 2012.
  3. Merey, S, Sinayuc, C, New software that predicts hydrate properties and its use in gas hydrate studies, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2016, 61 (5), 1930–1951.
  4. Gaddipati, M, Code comparison of methane hydrate reservoir simulators using CMG STAR, MSc thesis, West Virginia University, USA, 2008.
  5. Moridis, GJ, Kowalsky, MB, Pruess, K, HydrateResSim User's Manual: A numerical simulator for modeling the behavior of hydrates in geologic media, Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
  6. NIST, Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems. accessed on 27 September, 2016, http:// webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/ (accessed 27.09.2016)
  7. IAPWS, Revised Release on the IAPWS Industrial Formulation 1997 for the Thermodynamic Properties of Water and Steam, The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam Lucerne, Switzerland, August, 2007.
  8. Sengers, JV, Parsi, BK, Representative equations for the viscosity of water sub- stance, The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1984, 13, 185-205.
  9. IAPWS, Release on the IAPWS Formulation 2011 for the Thermal Conductivity of Ordinary Water Substance, The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Czech Republic, September, 2011.
  10. Waite, WF, Stern, L, Kirby, SH, Winters, WJ, Mason, DH, Simultaneous determination of thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and specific heat in sI methane hydrate, Geophysical Journal International, 2007, 169(2), 767–774.
  11. Vargaftik, NB, Volkov, BN, Voljak, LD, International Tables of the Surface Tension of Water, The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1983, 12, 817-820.
  12. Wagner, W, Pruß, A, The IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use, The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2002, 31, 387–535.
  13. Hanley, HJM, Haynes, WM, McCarty, RD, The viscosity and thermal conductivity coefficients for dense gaseous and liquid methane, The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1977, 6, 2, 597-616.
  14. Pratt, RM, Thermodynamic Properties Involving Derivatives Usi