Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of the Effect of Water Flux to a Gas Zone after Through Tubing Perforations on Gas Production by Numerical Simulations

Pages
99–113
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even in a long term of gas production, it is possible to observethe remarks of previous water flux from upper zone after analyzing water saturation distribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After perforating a gas zone with through tubing perforation method, other possible gas zones are alsoperforated from bottom to top accordingly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, if one of these zones is highly saturated with water,water might flow through the perforations where gas production is possible.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even in a long term of gas production, it is possible to observethe remarks of previous water flux from upper zone after analyzing water saturation distribution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After perforating a gas zone with through tubing perforation method, other possible gas zones are alsoperforated from bottom to top accordingly. However, if one of these zones is highly saturated with water,water might flow through the perforations where gas production is possible. In this study, the water fluxfrom upper perforation to lower perforations where gas is available was simulated by using TOUGH +RealGasBrine simulator. The effects of permeability, pressure differences between zones, and salinity onwater flux through gas zone were investigated in this study. Permeability affects the behavior of water fluxand its amount to gas zone significantly. Similarly, these effects were seen for the cases with pressuredifferences between zones and salinity in water zone even though these effects are less than those observedin permeability cases. It was observed that the duration of exposure of gas zone to water flux should be keptminimum by applying well completion operations quickly to isolate water zone and stop water flux fromthis zone to gas zone. After isolating water zone with well completion operations, gas productionsimulations from gas zone were conducted at a constant production pressure of 5 MPa. It was observed thatgas production from gas zone was retarded and water production from gas zone was higher compared to theoriginal cases without any water invasion. Even in a long term of gas production, it is possible to observethe remarks of previous water flux from upper zone after analyzing water saturation distribution.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEREY, Ş. (2022). Analysis of the Effect of Water Flux to a Gas Zone after Through Tubing Perforations on Gas Production by Numerical Simulations. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 99–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/472185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Lea, JF, Nickens, HV. 2004. Solving gas-well liquid-loading problems, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 56(4), 30-36.
  2. Turner, RG, Hubbard, MG, Dukler, AE. 1969. Analysis and Prediction of Minimum Flow Rate for the Continuous Removal of Liquids from Gas Wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 21(11), 1475-1482.
  3. Okon, A., Appah, D., Akpabio, J. 2017. Water Coning Prediction Review and Control: Developing an Integrated Approach, Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 14(4), 1-24. Tătaru, A, Simescu, NB. Underbalance well completion - a modern approach for mature gas fields. 8th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education, Sibiu, Romania, 2017, pp 1-7.
  4. Joseph, A, Sand, CM, Ajienka, JA. Classification and Management of Liquid Loading in Gas Wells, The Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria, 2013, pp 1-25.
  5. Anwar A, Hassan S, Belhadj B. An integrated approach to determine hydrocarbon potential in low resistivity, thinly laminated reservoir: East-Delta area, Egypt. In: MOC 2002,
  6. Alex, Egypt. Islam, ARMT, Islam, MA, Tasnuva, A, Biswas, RK, Jahan, K. 2014. Petro physical parameter studies for characterization of gas reservoir of Narsingdi gas field, Bangladesh, International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 2(2), 53-58.
  7. Xi, F, Bing, Z, Xuefeng, Y, Hui, D. 2015. Effective water influx control in gas reservoir development: Problems and countermeasures, Natural Gas Industry B, 2, 240-246.
  8. Jacobsen, S et al. 1991. Log Interpretation Strategies in Gas Wells, Oil Review, April, 22-34. Wild Well Control (WWC), Completions and Workovers. https://www.wildwell.com/wp-content/uploads/Completions-and- Workover.pdf (accessed at 29.10.2018).
  9. Cosad, C. 1992.
  10. Choosing a Perforation Strategy, Oilfield Review, October, 54-69.
  11. McAleese, S. Operational Aspects of Oil and Gas Well Testing; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherland, 2000. CNPC (China National Petroleum Corporation). Perforation Technology for Complex Reservoirs. Science & Technology Management Department, 2011.
  12. Ifediora, E, Ibrahim, C, Ekeke, D, Nwaochei, F, Ogugua, E., Orumwese, S, Idedevbo, K. A Novel Technology for Through Tubing Perforation in Highly Deviated Wells Where Electric Line Marotta, M, Morsetti, C, Mazzoni, S, Diaf, R, Cherri, R. Production Optimization in Plio-Pleistocene Sequences by Through Tubing Perforations and Sand Consolidation in Rigless Activities: Italian Case Histories, 13th Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy, 2017, pp