SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

COMPARING THE WORKAHOLISM LEVEL OF MANAGERS AND NON-MANAGERS

YÖNETİCİLERİN VE YÖNETİCİ OLMAYAN ÇALIŞANLARIN İŞKOLİKLİK DÜZEYLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Emrah ÖZSOY
Pages
806–821
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both the T Test and Hedges’ g Test findings indicated that employeeswho have a managerial position have higher workaholism level than those who do not.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to compare the workaholism level of managers and non-managers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:N=283 employees working in several sectors participated in the research. 85 participants reported that they hold amanagerial position in the organization, whereas 194 employees reported that they did not have a managerialposition in the organization, and 4 participants didn’t report their position in the organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both the T Test and Hedges’ g Test findings indicated that employeeswho have a managerial position have higher workaholism level than those who do not.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to compare the workaholism level of managers and non-managers. N=283 employees working in several sectors participated in the research. 85 participants reported that they hold amanagerial position in the organization, whereas 194 employees reported that they did not have a managerialposition in the organization, and 4 participants didn’t report their position in the organization. Workaholism wasmeasured by the Turkish version (Doğan & Tel, 2010) of DUWAS workaholism scale developed by Schaufeli,Taris, and Bakker (2009). In order to compare the workaholism levels of the participants, the Independent SamplesT Test and Hedges’ g Test were performed. Both the T Test and Hedges’ g Test findings indicated that employeeswho have a managerial position have higher workaholism level than those who do not. Also managers working inthe private sector scored higher in workaholism than the managers who work in public organizations. Workinghours per week were found to be higher in private sector. Results were discussed and suggestions were made forfurther research.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı yönetici ve yönetici olmayan çalışanların işkoliklik seviyelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çeşitli sektörlerden n= 383 çalışan araştırmaya katılmıştır. 85 katılımcı örgütte yönetsel pozisyona sahip olduğunu belirtmiştir, ancak 194 çalışan örgütte yönetsel pozisyona sahip olmadığını belirtmiştir ve 4 çalışan örgütteki pozisyonunu belirtmemiştir. İşkoliklik Schaufeli, Taris ve Bakker (2009) tarafından geliştirilen DUWAS işkoliklik ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu (Doğan ve Tel, 2010) ile ölçülmüştür. Katılımcıların işkoliklik düzeylerinin karşılaştırılabilmesi için Bağımsız Örneklemler T Testi ve Hedge g Testi uygulamıştır. T Testi ve Hedge g Testi bulguları yönetsel pozisyona sahip olan çalışanların işkoliklik düzeylerinin, yönetsel pozisyona sahip olmayan çalışanların işkoliklik düzeylerinden daha fazla olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Aynı zamanda özel sektörde çalışan yöneticiler, kamu sektöründe çalışan yöneticilere göre daha yüksek işkoliklik skoru almıştır. Özel sektörde haftalık çalışma saati daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Bulgular tartışılmış ve gelecek araştırma önerilerinde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZSOY, E. (2022). COMPARING THE WORKAHOLISM LEVEL OF MANAGERS AND NON-MANAGERS. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 806–821. https://ajindex.com/articles/470627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Andreassen C. S., Hetland J., & Pallesen S. (2010). The relationship between workaholism, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 3-17.
  2. Andreassen, C. S. (2013). Work addiction. In P. Miller (Ed.). Principles of addiction: Comprehensive addictive behaviors and disorders (pp. 837-845).
  3. San Diego, CA: Elsevier. Andreassen, C. S. (2014). Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 1-11.
  4. Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J. & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 265-272.
  5. Andreassen, C. S., Hetland, J., Molde, H., & Pallesen, S. (2011). “Workaholism” and potential outcomes in wellbeing and health in a cross-occupational sample. Stress and Health, 27, 209-214.
  6. Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Torsheim, T. (2018). Workaholism as a Mediator between work-related stressors and health outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 73. Andreassen, C., Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. (2007). The relationship between strong motivation to work, "workaholism", and health. Psychology & Health, 22, 615-629.
  7. Aziz, S., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). A cluster analysis investigation of workaholism as a syndrome. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 52-62.
  8. Aziz, S., Adkins, C. T., Walker, A. G., & Wuensch, K. L. (2010). Workaholism and work–life imbalance: Doescultural origin influence the relationship? International Journal of Psychology, 41, 72-79.
  9. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: A spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 23-33.
  10. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Oerlemans, W., & Sonnentag, S. (2012). Workaholism and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study of leisure activites. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 87-107.
  11. Bardakçı, S., & Baloğlu, M. (2012). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan okul yöneticilerinin işkoliklik eğilimleri (Workaholic tendencies among school administators employed in primary and secondary schools). Eğitim ve Bilim, 37, 45-56.
  12. Bulgurcu Gürel, E. B., & Altunoğlu, A. E. (2016). İşkoliklik, iş stresi ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi: Muğla İlinde Bir Araştırma. Journal of International Social Research, 9, 1431-1438.
  13. Burke R. J., Matthiesen S. B., & Pallesen S. (2006). Personality correlates of workaholism. Personality and Individual Differences. 40,