Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE

LİDERLİK VE ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANS ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Pages
1044–1095
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Second, the authors, through vigorous examination, display andevaluate existing variables and measures on leadership and organizational performance within the literature.Finally, the authors aim to contribute to the field by presenting a detailed future research agenda and practicalconsiderations for managerial implications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last few years, due to the surge in the attention towards leadership and the lack of a reviewmapping the effects of leadership on organizational performance, we believe its coherent to provide a clear reviewon leadership and how it affects organizational performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper aims to review empirical studies onleadership and organizational performance with the aim of constructing a comprehensive model to conceptualizeexisting literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Second, the authors, through vigorous examination, display andevaluate existing variables and measures on leadership and organizational performance within the literature.Finally, the authors aim to contribute to the field by presenting a detailed future research agenda and practicalconsiderations for managerial implications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the last few years, due to the surge in the attention towards leadership and the lack of a reviewmapping the effects of leadership on organizational performance, we believe its coherent to provide a clear reviewon leadership and how it affects organizational performance. This paper aims to review empirical studies onleadership and organizational performance with the aim of constructing a comprehensive model to conceptualizeexisting literature. The authors reviewed main journals with impact factor of over 2 and all Leadership titledSSCI journals. As a result, 687 studies published between 1957 and 2017 were analyzed, out of which 486 metthe criteria of being empirical studies on leadership and performance. Out of the 486, 20 articles usedOrganizational Performance as their dependent variable, thus were included in our model. In doing so, theauthors aim to extend the field in three ways: First, based on their review, the authors mapped a comprehensivemodel of the effects of leadership style and leadership characteristics through moderators and organizationalmediators on organizational performance. Second, the authors, through vigorous examination, display andevaluate existing variables and measures on leadership and organizational performance within the literature.Finally, the authors aim to contribute to the field by presenting a detailed future research agenda and practicalconsiderations for managerial implications.

Özet

Son birkaç yılda, liderliğe gösterilen ilginin artması ve liderliğin örgütsel performans üzerindeki etkilerini özetleyen çalışmaların limitliliği nedeniyle, liderlik ve bunun örgütsel performansı nasıl etkilediği konusunda net bir inceleme sunmanın yararlı olduğuna inanıyoruz. Bu çalışma, mevcut literatürü kavramsallaştırmak için kapsamlı bir model oluşturmak amacıyla, liderlik ve örgütsel performans üzerine ampirik çalışmaları gözden geçirir. Yazarlar etki faktörü en az 2 olan ana dergileri ve tüm Liderlik başlıklı SSCI dergilerini gözden geçirmiştir. 1957-2017 yılları arasında yayınlanan 687 çalışma analiz edilmiş ve bunların 486'sı liderlik ve performans üzerine ampirik çalışmalar olma kriterlerini karşılamıştır. 486 çalışmadan 20'sinde Örgütsel Performans bağımlı değişken olarak kullanmış ve bu nedenle modelimize dahil edilmiştir. Bu çalışmayla, yazarlar alanı üç şekilde genişletmeyi amaçlamaktadır: Birincisi, yazarlar, incelemelerine dayanarak, liderlik tarzı ve liderlik özelliklerinin düzenleyici ve aracı değişkenler aracılığıyla örgütsel performans üzerindeki etkilerinin kapsamlı bir modelini haritalamıştır. İkincisi, yazarlar, literatürde liderlik ve örgütsel performans üzerine mevcut değişkenleri tablolaştırarak sergilemiş ve değerlendirmiştir. Son olarak, bu çalışma literatürdeki boşlukları saptayıp, gelecek araştırma gündemlerine ışık tutmayı hedeflerken, aynı zamanda pratiğe yönelik önemli olabilecek hususları da özetlemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERERDİ, C., DURGUN, E. Ü. (2022). CONCEPTUAL REVIEW OF LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 1044–1095. https://ajindex.com/articles/470449

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. 106 empirical studies included in this review are marked with “*”, 20 articles on organizational performance are marked with “**”. *Ashkanasy, N. M., & Paulsen, N. (2013). The influence of follower mood on leader mood and task performance: An affective, follower-centric perspective of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(4), 496-515. *Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2011). Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 282-294. *Avolio, B. J., Howell, J. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of management journal, 42(2), 219-227. *Awamleh, R., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 345-373. *Barrett, J. D., Vessey, W. B., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Getting leaders to think: Effects of training, threat, and pressure on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 729-750. *Bartone, P. T., Snook, S. A., Forsythe, G. B., Lewis, P., & Bullis, R. C. (2007). Psychosocial development and leader performance of military officer cadets. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 490-504. *Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 89-106. **Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615-633. **Boehm, S. A., Dwertmann, D. J., Bruch, H., & Shamir, B. (2015). The missing link? Investigating organizational identity strength and transformational leadership climate as mechanisms that connect CEO charisma with firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 156-171. *Boies, K., Fiset, J., & Gill, H. (2015). Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1080-1094. *Boyce, L. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Wisecarver, M. Z. (2010). Propensity for self-development of leadership attributes: Understanding, predicting, and supporting performance of leader self-development. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 159-178. *Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformatio