SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISPOSITIONAL ENVY AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING

HASETLİK EĞİLİMİ VE BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMI İLİŞKİSİ

Fitnat Nazlı SAYĞAN YAĞIZ
Pages
419–437
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings show that dispositional envy is negativelyrelated to knowledge sharing

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the “Social Value Orientation” model, the value orientation of individuals is divided into twocategories as prosocial and proself.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, this study was carried out on 175 bank employees in the bankingsector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings show that dispositional envy is negativelyrelated to knowledge sharing
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

According to the “Social Value Orientation” model, the value orientation of individuals is divided into twocategories as prosocial and proself. Proselfs (individuals with proself value orientation) are reluctant to share theirknowledge. Within the scope of this study, individuals with dispositional envy are described as proselfs. There arestudies in the literature in which envy is considered as a feeling and associated with sharing knowledge. However,no study is found on the relationship between knowledge sharing and dispositional envy which is a personality trait.In this study, based on the “Social Value Orientation” model, the relationship between dispositional envy andknowledge sharing is investigated. Knowledge sharing is vital in the banking sector, where knowledge managementtechnologies are used extensively. For this reason, this study was carried out on 175 bank employees in the bankingsector. Quantitative research methods were used in the study. Findings show that dispositional envy is negativelyrelated to knowledge sharing

Özet

“Sosyal Değer Yönelimi” modeline göre, bireylerin değer yönelimi prososyal ve kendine yanlı olmak üzere iki kategoriye ayrılmaktadır. Kendine yanlılar (kendine yanlı değer yönelimli bireyler) bilgilerini paylaşmak konusunda isteksizdirler. Bu çalışma kapsamında, hasetlik eğilimi olan bireyler kendilerine yanlı olarak ele alınmaktadır. Yazında hasetliğin bir duygu olarak ele alındığı ve bilgi paylaşımı ile ilişkilendirildiği çalışmalar mevcuttur. Ancak bir kişilik özelliği olarak hasetlik eğiliminin bilgi paylaşımı ile ilişkisine dair bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışmada, “Sosyal Değer Yönelimi” modelinden yola çıkılarak hasetlik eğilimi ile bilgi paylaşımı arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Bilgi yönetimi teknolojilerinin yaygın olarak kullanıldığı bankacılık sektöründe bilgi paylaşımı hayati önem taşımaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma bankacılık sektöründeki 175 banka çalışanı üzerinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, hasetlik eğilimi ile bilgi paylaşımı arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAĞIZ, F. N. S. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DISPOSITIONAL ENVY AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 419–437. https://ajindex.com/articles/470402

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbas, F., Rasheed, A., Um-e-Habiba, and Shahzad, I. (2013), "Factors promoting knowledge sharing and knowledge creation in banking sector of Pakistan", Management Science Letters, 3, 405–414.
  2. Abuazoum, A. A., Azizan, N., and Ahmad, N. (2013). Knowledge Sharing for the Islamic Banking Sector in Malaysia. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(3), 368-371.
  3. Al Qeisi, K. I., and Al Zagheer, H. M. (2015). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviour among personnel in banking industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 49-59. Bălău, N. and Utz, S. (2017). Information sharing as strategic behaviour: the role of information display, social motivation and time pressure, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 589-605.
  4. Bavik, Y. L., Tang, P. M., Shao, R., & Lam, L. W. (2018). Ethical leadership and employee knowledge sharing: Exploring dual-mediation paths. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(2), 322–332.
  5. Bavik, F. (2015). Effects of goal interdependence on help-seeking through knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding: the moderating roles of reciprocity beliefs, Master’s Thesis, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. Bedeian, A. G. (1995). Workplace envy. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 49-56.
  6. Bilal, H. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Banking Sector, City University Research Journal, 2(9), 404-414.
  7. Charash, Y. C. and Mueller, J. S., (2007). Does Perceived Unfairness Exacerbate or Mitigate Interpersonal Counterproductive Work Behaviors Related to Envy, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 666–680.
  8. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Larson, E. (2017b). An emotion divided: Studying envy is better than studying “benign” and “malicious” envy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 174–183.
  9. Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64–88.
  10. Connelly, C.E., Ford, D.P., Turel, O., Gallupe, B. and Zweig, D. (2014), “I’m busy (and competitive)! Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 74-85.
  11. Cyr, S. and Choo, C.W. (2010). The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 824–846.
  12. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know. Boston: Harved Business School Press.
  13. De Clercq, D., Haq