SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

How Tesla created advantages in the ev automotive paradigm, through an integrated business model of value capture and value creation

Tesla, değer yakalama ve değer yaratmaya entegre bir iş modeli ile elektrikli araçlar paradigmasında nasıl avantajlar yarattı

John W. LANG
Beat REBER
Huda ALDORI
Pages
385–404
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ouranalysis shows the attributes of the Tesla business model's configuration, which have been the driversof its disruptive approach to the existing legacy automotive markets, have been instrumental increating and capturing value for its continual platform development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been no research conducted that uses a holistic conceptual framework that simultaneouslyrelates the ecosystem, platform technologies, innovations, and modularity to the firms businessmodel.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thepaper draws on the strategic and operations management literature and examines the relationshipbetween the ecosystem platform's attributes, modular innovations, and a new business model createdby Tesla.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ouranalysis shows the attributes of the Tesla business model's configuration, which have been the driversof its disruptive approach to the existing legacy automotive markets, have been instrumental increating and capturing value for its continual platform development.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There has been no research conducted that uses a holistic conceptual framework that simultaneouslyrelates the ecosystem, platform technologies, innovations, and modularity to the firms businessmodel. These elements are central to Tesla’s shifting of the automotive paradigm from internalcombustion engine transportation to electric vehicle (EV) energy powertrains. The purpose of thispaper is to explore how the ecosystem, business model, modularity and innovations of Tesla, as anillustrative case, have contributed to a new vehicular platform and business model EV paradigm. Thepaper draws on the strategic and operations management literature and examines the relationshipbetween the ecosystem platform's attributes, modular innovations, and a new business model createdby Tesla. Battery technology has been a focal point of the Tesla platform, and this is predicted to be anessential part of the battleground for the future of the electric vehicle automotive industry. Ouranalysis shows the attributes of the Tesla business model's configuration, which have been the driversof its disruptive approach to the existing legacy automotive markets, have been instrumental increating and capturing value for its continual platform development.

Özet

Elektrikli araçların yayılmasına ve benimsenmesine doğru hareket eden giderek daha büyük bir malzeme araştırma veritabanı olmasına rağmen, bugüne kadar, içten yanmalı motor taşımacılığından elektrikli araçların enerji aktarma mekanizmalarına doğru paragdigmayı değiştirmeye yardımcı olmak için kullanılan, Tesla gibi firmaların, kavramsal bir çerçeve kullanılarak; ekosistemini, iş modelini, yeniliklerini ve modülerliğini aynı anda ilişkilendiren hiçbir araştırma yapılmamıştır. Bu makalenin amacı, önemli bir durum olarak, Tesla'nın ekosisteminin, iş modelinin, modülerliğinin ve yeniliklerinin, yeni bir araç platformuna ve iş modeli olan Elektrikli Araçlar paradigmasına nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu araştırmaktır. Makale, stratejik yönetim ve operasyon yönetimi literatüründen yararlanmakta ve ekosistem platformunun özellikleri, modüler yenilikler ve Tesla tarafından oluşturulan yeni bir iş modeli arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Pil teknolojisi, Tesla platformunun ve farklılaşmasının odak noktası olmuştur ve elektrikli araç otomotiv endüstrisinin geleceği için savaş alanının önemli bir parçası olacağı tahmin edilmektedir, analizimiz genel otomotiv pazarlarına ve özellikle elektrikli araç pazarına yönelik, sürdürülebilir platform gelişimi için değer yaratan ve yakalayan, yıkıcı yaklaşımın ana dayanak noktası ve itici gücü olan Tesla İş Modeli’nin şekillenmesinin özelliklerini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

LANG, J. W., REBER, B., ALDORI, H. (2022). How Tesla created advantages in the ev automotive paradigm, through an integrated business model of value capture and value creation. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 385–404. https://ajindex.com/articles/470262

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic management journal, 37(4), 625-648.
  2. Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
  3. Aggeri, F., Elmquist, M., & Pohl, H. (2009). Managing learning in the automotive industry–the innovation race for electric vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 9(2), 123-147.
  4. Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems (pp. 204-288). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). MIT press. Bartman, T., 2015. Why Tesla Won't Be Able to Scale. Harvard Business Review, 2-5. BCG, 2016 Batteries for Electric Cars: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Outlook to 2020,
  5. The Boston Consulting Group Bohnsack, R., Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2014). Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles. Research Policy, 43(2), 284-300.
  6. Bontempo, José-Vitor, Chaves Alves, Flavia, de Almeida Oroski, Fabio, 2017. Developing new platform chemicals: what is required for a new bio-based molecule to become a platform chemical in the bioeconomy? Faraday Discuss 202 (0), 213–225. https:// doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00052A. Brusoni S, Principe A, Pavitt K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(4): 597– 621. Cacciatori, E., Jacobides, M.G., 2005. The dynamic limits of specialization: vertical integration reconsidered. Organ. Stud. 26, 1851–1883.
  7. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Yoffie, D. B. (2007). Wintel: Cooperation and conflict. Management Science, 53(4), 584-598.
  8. Chen, Y., & Perez, Y. (2018). Business model design: lessons learned from Tesla Motors. In Towards a Sustainable Economy (pp. 53-69).
  9. Springer, Cham. Chen, S., Wang, Y., & Tseng, M. M. (2009). Mass customisation as a collaborative engineering effort. International Journal of Collaborative Engineering, 1(1-2), 152-167.
  10. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  11. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 354-