Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The relationship between workplace incivility, burnout andorganizational cynicism: A research for academicians

İş yeri nezaketsizliği, tükenmişlik ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişki: Akademisyenlere yönelik bir araştırma

Pages
644–663
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, workplace incivility, emotional abuse, control and manipulation of working conditions, professional devaluation, burnout, emotional burnout, and the tendency to decrease personal achievement were the variables that interacted most with organizational cynicism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today's organizational structures, where competition is increasing rapidly and the importance of success-oriented work is constantly reminded, the stress and pressure on managers and employees may increase.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Qualitative research methods were preferred as the analysis method, the data were obtained through interviews, and the MAXQDA 20 program was used for analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, workplace incivility, emotional abuse, control and manipulation of working conditions, professional devaluation, burnout, emotional burnout, and the tendency to decrease personal achievement were the variables that interacted most with organizational cynicism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In today's organizational structures, where competition is increasing rapidly and the importance of success-oriented work is constantly reminded, the stress and pressure on managers and employees may increase. Although the technological developments experienced today improve working conditions compared to the past, they are helpless in the face of this pressure. Due to this pressure, undesirable situations such as workplace incivility, burnout and organizational cynicism often occur in organizations. This study aims to determine which variables cause workplace incivility and burnout in terms of academicians and whether these variables are related to organizational cynicism. The study sample was determined as academicians working in higher education institutions. Qualitative research methods were preferred as the analysis method, the data were obtained through interviews, and the MAXQDA 20 program was used for analysis. As a result of the study, workplace incivility, emotional abuse, control and manipulation of working conditions, professional devaluation, burnout, emotional burnout, and the tendency to decrease personal achievement were the variables that interacted most with organizational cynicism.

Özet

Rekabetin hızla arttığı ve başarı odaklı çalışmanın öneminin sürekli hatırlatıldığı günümüz örgüt yapılarında yönetici ve çalışanlar üzerindeki stres ve baskının artması olası bir durumdur. Günümüzde yaşanan teknolojik gelişmeler her ne kadar çalışma koşullarını geçmişe göre iyileştirse de, oluşan bu baskı karşısında çaresiz kalmaktadır. Oluşan bu baskı nedeniyle çoğu zaman örgütlerde iş yeri nezaketsizliği, tükenmişlik ve örgütsel sinizm gibi istenmeyen durumlar meydana gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı akademisyenler açısından hangi değişkenlerin iş yeri nezaketsizliği ve tükenmişlik oluşturduğunun belirlenmesi ve bu değişkenlerin örgütsel sinizmle ilişkili olup olmadığının tespit edilmesidir. Çalışmanın örneklemi yükseköğretim kurumlarında görev yapan akademisyenler olarak belirlenmiştir. Analiz yöntemi olarak nitel araştırma yöntemleri tercih edilmiş, veriler mülakatlar aracılığıyla elde edilmiş ve analizler için MAXQDA 20 programı kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda iş yeri nezaketsizliği açısından; duygusal istismar, çalışma şartlarının kontrolü ve manipülasyonu, mesleki devalüasyon, tükenmişlik açısından; duygusal tükenmişlik ve kişisel başarının azalma eğilimi örgütsel sinizmle en fazla etkileşime giren değişkenler olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİNİ, M. A. (2022). The relationship between workplace incivility, burnout andorganizational cynicism: A research for academicians. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 644–663. https://ajindex.com/articles/470216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akhigbe, O. J. ve Gail, O. J. (2017). Job burnout and organizational cynicism among employees in nigerian banks. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(22), 125-140.
  2. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  3. Andersson, L. M. ve Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(5), 449-469.
  4. Andersson, L. M. ve Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy Of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.
  5. Anjum, M. A., Anjum P. ve Ahmed, A. (2017). Relationship dynamics of burnout, turnover intentions and workplace ıncivility perceptions. Business & Economic Review, 9(3), 155-172.
  6. Apaydin, E. A., Rose, D. E., Yano, E. M., Shekelle, P. G., Stockdale, S. E. ve Mohr, D. C. (2021). Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Workplace Civility and Burnout Among VA Primary Care Providers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1-5.
  7. Avşaroğlu, S., DENİZ, E.M. ve Kahraman, A. (2005). Teknik öğretmenlerde yaşam doyumu iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), 115-129.
  8. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. ve Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 43(1), 83-104.
  9. Bernerth J. B., Armenakis Achilles A., Feild H. S. ve Walker H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment a study of ımportant organizational change variables. The Journal Of Applied Behavıoral Science, 43(3), 303-326.
  10. Blau, G. ve Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 595-614.
  11. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R. ve Dean, J. W. (1999, May). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes in Eastern, Academy of Management Proceedings, 2(1), 150-153.
  12. Byrne, Z. S. ve Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology.23(1), 54- 72. Childs, J. H. ve Stoeber, J. (2012). Do you