Journals / Bulletin of the mineral research and exploration / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 161

Geology and formation of Nevruztepe Fe-Cu skarn mineralization (Kayseri-Turkey)

Pages
101–119
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Waste from separation ofthe magnetite is 0.16 to 0.19% Cu; with flotation this was beneficiated to 19% Cu.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Nevruztepe iron-copper prospect is a skarn near Yeşilhisar (Kayseri).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The skarn was generated in Permian to Jurassic carbonate rocksby the Eocene Yahyalı granitic pluton.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Waste from separation ofthe magnetite is 0.16 to 0.19% Cu; with flotation this was beneficiated to 19% Cu.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Nevruztepe iron-copper prospect is a skarn near Yeşilhisar (Kayseri). It has been overlookedas a potential producer of copper. The skarn was generated in Permian to Jurassic carbonate rocksby the Eocene Yahyalı granitic pluton. Lithologic units, including skarns, dip about 15 degreessouthward. Skarns are both prograde (garnet and diopside) and retrograde (epidote); both exoskarnand endoskarn exist. Most of the magnetite is in a quartz-sulfide stage in retrograde skarn that iscut by veins and lenses containing quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite. Granite and mineralized skarn arerare at the surface. From 2013 to 2015, 31 drill holes (totaling 6.178,5 m) encountered skarn to adepth of 450 m. Mineralized zones vary from 1,2 to 54,7 m thick. Fe mean grade ranges from 12%to 49%; mean copper grades vary from 10 to 4650 ppm. The deposit contains 5.096.788 tonnes ofmineralized material. Microscopy on samples of drill core shows that the ore minerals are primarilymagnetite, hematite, and chalcopyrite. Some magnetite is altered to hematite. Experiments showthat with grinding to 100 microns the iron can be beneficiated to 66%. Waste from separation ofthe magnetite is 0.16 to 0.19% Cu; with flotation this was beneficiated to 19% Cu.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖNMEZ, C., TİRİNGA, D., ATEŞÇİ, B., ÇELİK, Y., DEMİRKIRAN, G., TÜRKEL, A., ÜNLÜ, T. (2022). Geology and formation of Nevruztepe Fe-Cu skarn mineralization (Kayseri-Turkey). Bulletin of the mineral research and exploration, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 161, 101–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/469396

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alan, İ., Şahin, Ş., Altun, İ., Bakırhan, B., Balcı, V., Böke, N., Saçlı, L., Pehlivan, Ş., Kop, A., Hanilçi, N., Çelik, Ö. F. 2007. Orta Toroslar’ın Jeodinamik Evrimi, Ereğli (Konya)-Ulukışla (Niğde)- Karsantı (Adana)-Namrun (İçel) Yöresi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 11006, 245, Ankara (unpublished). Ayhan, A., Lengeranlı, Y. 1986. Yahyalı-Demirkazık (Aladağlar Yöresi) Arasının Tektonostratigrafik Özellikleri, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 27, 31-45.
  2. Baghban, S., Hosseinzadeh, M. R., Moayyed, M., Mokhtari, M. A. A., Gregory, D. 2015. Geology, mineral chemistry and formation conditions of calc- silicate minerals of Astamal Fe-LREE distal skarn deposit, Eastern Azarbaijan Province, NW Iran. Ore Geology Reviews 68, 79-96.
  3. Bayram, A. İ., Bayrak, M. Y. 2018. Kayseri-Yeşilhisar Demir Cevherinin Zenginleştirme Çalışması. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü MAT Dairesi Arşivi, Ankara (unpublished). Boztuğ, D, Çevikbaş, A., Demirkol, C., Tatar, S., Akyıldız, M., Otlu, N. 2002. Karamadazı Plütonunun (Yahyalı-Kayseri) Mineralojik-Petrografik ve Jeokimyasal İncelemesi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 45, 1, 41-58.
  4. Çevikbaş, A., Boztuğ, D., Demirkol, C., Yılmaz, S., Akyıldız, M., Açlan, M., Demir, Ö., Taş, R. 1995. Horoz Plütonunun (Ulukışla-Niğde) Oluşumunda Dengelenmiş Hibrid Sistemin Mineralojik ve Jeokimyasal Kanıtları, TJK Bülteni 10, 62-77.
  5. Einaudi, M. T., Meinert, L. D., Newberry, R. J. 1981.
  6. Skarn Deposits, Economic Geology, 75th Anniversary 317-391.
  7. Hanilçi, N., Öztürk, H. 2011. Geochemical/Isotopic Evolution of Pb–Zn Deposits in the Central and Eastern Taurides, Turkey. International Geology Review 53, 13, 1478-1507.
  8. Keskin, H., Alan, İ. 2013. Yahyalı (Kayseri)–Dündarlı (Niğde) Arasında Kalan Alanın Jeolojisi (Doğu Toroslar’ın Jeodinamik Evrimi ve Metalojenezi Projesi), Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 11612, 50, Ankara (unpublished). Kuşçu, İ., Gençalioğlu Kuşçu, G., Göncüoğlu, M. C. 2001. Karamadazı Demir Yatağında Skarn Zonlanması ve Mineralojisi. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 44/3, 1-14.
  9. Kuşçu, İ., Gençalioğlu Kuşçu, G., Saraç, C., Meinert, L. D. 2002. Jeokimyasal Karakterizasyon Çalışmalarında Faktör Analizi Yönteminin Kullanımı: Çelebi Granitoyidi ve Karamadazı Graniti. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni 45/1, 125-140.
  10. Meinert, L. D., Hefton, K. K., Mayes, D., Tasiran, I. 1997. Geology, zonation, and fluid evolution of the Big Gossan Cu-Au skarn deposit, Ertsberg District, Irian Jaya, Econ. Geol. 92, 509-534.
  11. Meinert, L. D., Dipple, G. M., N