Journals / Bulletin of the mineral research and exploration / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 162

Characteristic mollusc, larger foraminifera findings and environmental interpretations of the Middle Eocene Kocaçay formation deposits around Ayvalıca (Bayat, Çorum)

Pages
235–267
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lithological and faunal contentsindicate that sediments of the Kocaçay formation were deposited within lagoon to nummulitic setsin a shallow marine environment

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the Çankırı-Çorum Basin was studied for various purposes such as geological,stratigraphical, tectonic, coal and oil exploration, studies on fossils are limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The formation is composed of conglomerate, carbonated sandstone, limestoneand sandy marls and also includes rich larger foraminifera and molluscs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lithological and faunal contentsindicate that sediments of the Kocaçay formation were deposited within lagoon to nummulitic setsin a shallow marine environment
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although the Çankırı-Çorum Basin was studied for various purposes such as geological,stratigraphical, tectonic, coal and oil exploration, studies on fossils are limited. Especially therehave not been detailed studies on molluscs and larger foraminifera. The research area is located atthe vicinity of Ayvalıca (north of Çankırı-Çorum basin). The Middle Eocene Kocaçay formation,which outcrops in the Çankırı-Çorum Basin, is widespread around Bayat Çorum in the north of thebasin, Sulakyurt Kırıkkale in the west, Çiçekdağı Kırşehir in the south and Sungurlu Çorum in themiddle of the basin. The formation is composed of conglomerate, carbonated sandstone, limestoneand sandy marls and also includes rich larger foraminifera and molluscs. This study mainly focuseson taxonomy and environmental interpretations of Ostrea roncaensis (Partsch in coll. Bayan, 1870)de Gregorio, 1884, Velates perversus (Gmelin, 1791) species from Mollusca and Nummulitesbeaumonti d’Archiac and Haime, 1853, N. aturicus Joly and Leymerie,1848, N. perforatus (deMontfort, 1808) and Assilina exponens (Sowerby, 1840) species from larger Foraminifera. Inaddition, considering faunal features from bottom to top Ostrea roncaensis, Velates perversus,Nummulites aturicus and Assilina exponens Abundance Biozones were identified. The age rangeof the Kocaçay Formation is determined as Lutetian-Bartonian. Lithological and faunal contentsindicate that sediments of the Kocaçay formation were deposited within lagoon to nummulitic setsin a shallow marine environment

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRMÜŞ, M., GÜRSOY, M. (2022). Characteristic mollusc, larger foraminifera findings and environmental interpretations of the Middle Eocene Kocaçay formation deposits around Ayvalıca (Bayat, Çorum). Bulletin of the mineral research and exploration, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 162, 235–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/469390

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abad-Garcia, A. 2011. Paleotaxodonta y Pteriomorphia del Eoceno del Margen sur de la Depresión Central Catalana. Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. 795 p., 28 lam. Abate, A., Baglioni, A.,R., Bimbatti, C., Piccoli, G. 1988. Rassegna di Molluschi Marini Bentonici e Nectonici del Cenozoico Triveneto. Memorie di Scienze Geologiche 11: 135-171.
  2. Padova. Abouessa A., Pelletier J., Duringer P., Schuster, M., Schaeffer, P., Métais E., Benammi, M., Salem, M., Hlal, O., Brunet, M., Jaeger, J.J., Rubino, J.L. 2012. New insight into the Sedimantology and Stratigraphy of the Dur At Talah tidal-fluvial sequence (Eocene-Oligocene, Sirt Basin, Libya). Journal of African Earth Sciences 65: 72-90.
  3. Aigner, T. 1986 Bio. abrics as Dynamic Indicators in Nummulitik Accumulations, Discussions Journal of Sedimentary Petrol 56 (2): 317-320.
  4. Akarsu, İ. 1959. Çorum Bölgesinin Jeolojisi. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 7(1) 19-29.
  5. Akyol, E. 1978. Etude Palynologique De L’eocene De Bayat (Çorum-Turquıe) Et Essai De Correlation Entre Karakaya Et Emirşah. Bulletin of The Mineral Research and Exploration 91: 39-53.
  6. Al Menoufy, S. 2019. Nummulites perforatus (de Montfort, 1808) and N.beaumonti d’Archiac and Haime, 1853: a new record from Gebel Hafit, United Arab Emirates. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 43(1): 146-156.
  7. Alpan, T. 1968. Bayat (Çorum) Kuzeybatısının Jeoloji Etüdü. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 6822, Ankara (unpublished). Ateş, M., İmik, M., Ulu, Ü., Arbas, A., Gök, L., Genç, Ş., Poyraz, N., Cevher, F. 2010. Boğazkale Osmancık (Çorum)-Gümüşhacıköy (Amasya) Dolayının Jeolojisi. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 11246, Ankara (unpublished). Avşar, N. 1991. Systematic study of the some species of the Nummulites of Uzunlu (Boğazlıyan-Yozgat) Region. Yerbilimleri/Geosound 19: 17-33.
  8. Avşar, N. 1992. Namrun (İçel) Yöresi Paleojen Bentik Foraminifer Faunası. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 114: 127-144.
  9. Avşar, N. 1994. Kaçadağ-hasanağa Deresi (B Malatya) Civarının bazı Nummulites Türlerinin Sistematik İncelemesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik- Mimarlık Fakültesi 15.yıl Sempozyumu. 277-290.
  10. Avşar, N., Özser, E., Dinçer, F., Aksoy, E., İç, Z. 2010. Aydıncık (Yozgat) Yöresi Tersiyer (Lütesiyen) İstifinin Bentik Foraminiferleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 25 (1-2): 17-32.
  11. Aziz, A. 1973. İskillip civarı ile güney ve güneybatısın detay jeolojisi ve petrol olan