SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Barosu Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 3

THE HART-FULLER DEBATE, WHY DO THEY NOT AGREE?

Hart-Fuller Tartışması, Neden Anlaşamıyorlar?

E. İrem AKI
Pages
103–150
Publication Date
2018-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Firstly, I will explore the points thesetwo scholars cannot agree upon, and, secondly, I will consider the importancethese issues hold for legal philosophy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The debate between H.L.A.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The debate is generally known as the debate betweenHart and Fuller in the Harvard Law Review in 1958.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Firstly, I will explore the points thesetwo scholars cannot agree upon, and, secondly, I will consider the importancethese issues hold for legal philosophy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:H.L.A. Hart · Lon L. Fuller · Fuller Rönesansı

Abstract

The debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller occupies an important placein the philosophy of law. The debate is generally known as the debate betweenHart and Fuller in the Harvard Law Review in 1958. However, the debatecontinues until 1969 through the works of Hart and Fuller. In the traditionof legal philosophy, the debate has been read through the perspective of Hart.Today we can talk about a Fuller Renaissance, that is, a revival of interest inFuller’s work. Fuller Renaissance gives us the opportunity to read the debatewithin the framework of Fuller’s thought. Therefore, in this article I will read thedebate through the perspective of Fuller. Firstly, I will explore the points thesetwo scholars cannot agree upon, and, secondly, I will consider the importancethese issues hold for legal philosophy.

Özet

H.L.A. Hart ve Lon L. Fuller arasındaki tartışma hukuk felsefesi alanında

🔖

Cite This Article

AKI, E. İ. (2018). THE HART-FULLER DEBATE, WHY DO THEY NOT AGREE?. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 3, 103–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/46912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Akı, E. İrem, Lon L. Fuller’da Hukukun İç Ahlâkı, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2015.
  2. Akı, E. İrem, “Hukukun İç Ahlâkı: Lon L. Fuller’ın Görüşleri Çerçevesinde Bir İnceleme”, AÜHFD, C.64, S.1, 2015, s. 28-35.
  3. Aktaş, Sururi, Prosedürel Doğal Hukuk Lon L. Fuller’in Hukuk Kavramı, XII Levha Yayınları, İstanbul, 2011.
  4. Brunnee, Toope, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An International Account, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
  5. Fuller, Lon L., “Human Purpose and Natural Law”, The Journal of Philosophy, C.53, S.22, 1956, s.697-705.
  6. Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law—A Reply to Professor Hart”, Harvard Law Review, C.71, S.4, 1958, s. 630-672.
  7. Fuller, Lon L., “Reply to Professors Cohen and Dworkin”, Villanova Law Review, C.10, S. 4 1965, s. 655-666.
  8. Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1969.
  9. Fuller, Lon L., “Human Interaction and the Law”, Principles of Social Order Selected Essays of Lon. L. Fuller, Ed. Kenneth I Winston, Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portland Oregon, 2001, s. 231- 266. Fuller, Lon L., The Law in Quest of Itself, Beacon Press, Boston, 2009.
  10. Fuller, Lon L., “Pozitivizm ve Hukuka Bağlılık – Profesör Hart’a Bir Cevap”, Çev. Sevtap Metin, H.L.A. Hart ve Hukuk-Ahlâk Ayrımı, Ed. Sercan Gürler, Tekin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2015, s.153-215.
  11. Hart, H.L.A., “Positivism and The Separation of Law and Morals”, Harvard Law Review, C. 71, S.4, 1958, s. 593-629. H.L.A. Hart, “Lon L. Fuller: The Morality of Law”, Harvard Law Review, 1965, C.78, S.6, s. 1281-1296.
  12. Hart, H.L.A., “Lon L. Fuller: The Morality of Law”, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Clarendon Press, 1983, s. 343-364.
  13. Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, 1997.
  14. Hart, H.L.A., “Pozitivizm ve Hukuk ile Ahlâkın Ayrılması”, Çev. Ertuğrul Uzun, H.L. A Hart ve Hukuk-Ahlâk Ayrımı, Ed. Sercan Gürler, Tekin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2015, s. 101-151.
  15. Himma, Kennneth Einar, Hukukun Ahlâki Kriterleri Kapsayıcı ve Dışlayıcı Pozitivistler Arasındaki Tartışma, çev. Saim Üye, Bilge Su Yayınları, Ankara, 2010.
  16. İşsevenler, O. Vahdet “Hukukun Erdemi ve Fuller’ın Ahlâkları”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, C.LXXIV, S.2, 2016, s. 581-2.
  17. Luban, David, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  18. Metin, Sevtap, Heper, Altan, Ceza Hukuku Felsefesine Katkı: Radbruch Formülü, Tekin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2014.
  19. Metin, Sevtap, “Lon L. Fuller ve Prosedürel Doğal Hukuk Yak