Journals / Bozok Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Comparison between the Clinical and Radiological Findings in Patients with Operated Thoracolumbar Vertebra Fractures

CERRAHİ UYGULANAN TORAKOLOMBER VERTEBRA KIRIKLARINDA KLİNİK VE RADYOLOJİK SONUÇLARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
7–13
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand the final control measurements became higher as post- operative angles increased (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Comparison between the clinical and radiological findings in patients that underwentsurgery due to thoracolumbar fractures was aimed in this study.Methods: Between 1995 and 2009, 38 patients (15 male, 23 female, mean age 46.5 years) thatunderwent operation after diagnosis of thoracolumbar fractures were admitted to the study.Clinic values were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Frankle and scale of Oswestryscales.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Value of sagittal index (SI), value of local kyphosis angle (LKA) and the percentage ofanterior corpus height loss (ACHL) were measured using X-ray images.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand the final control measurements became higher as post- operative angles increased (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Comparison between the clinical and radiological findings in patients that underwentsurgery due to thoracolumbar fractures was aimed in this study.Methods: Between 1995 and 2009, 38 patients (15 male, 23 female, mean age 46.5 years) thatunderwent operation after diagnosis of thoracolumbar fractures were admitted to the study.Clinic values were evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Frankle and scale of Oswestryscales. Radiological values were evaluated with preoperative, postoperative and last control X-rayimages. Value of sagittal index (SI), value of local kyphosis angle (LKA) and the percentage ofanterior corpus height loss (ACHL) were measured using X-ray images. Results: The mean follow-up period was 96.5months, the mean VAS value was 13,5 mm, andthe mean Oswestry value was 15. Preoperative SI angles increased, as well as final controlmeasurements. On the other hand the final control measurements became higher as post- operative angles increased (P

Özet

Amaç: Torokolomber omurga kırığı tanısı ile cerrahi uygulanan hastaların klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma, 1995 ile 2009 tarihleri arasında torokolomber omurga kırığı tanısıile cerrahi uygulanan 38 (23 kadın, 15 erkek, ortalama yaş 46.5) hastadan oluşmaktadır. Klinikveriler Visual Analog Skala (VAS), Oswestry ve Frankel skalaları ile; radyolojik veriler ise hastalarıncerrahi öncesi, sonrası ve son kontrollerindeki çekilen X-ray görüntülerinde yapılan sagital indeks(Sİ) değerleri, lokal kifoz açıları (LKA) ve anterior korpus yükseklik kaybı (AKYK) yüzdeleri ölçülerekdeğerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 96,5 ay (6-183 ay) dır. VAS ortalaması 13,5 mm, Os- westry ortalaması 15tir. Ameliyat öncesi Sİ açıları arttıkça son kontrol açıları da yükselmekte veameliyat sonrası açılar ne kadar yüksekse son kontrol açıları da aynı oranda yüksek olmaktadır(P

🔖

Cite This Article

BASAT, H. Ç., YAZAR, T. (2022). Comparison between the Clinical and Radiological Findings in Patients with Operated Thoracolumbar Vertebra Fractures. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 7–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/468978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Eastlack RK, Bono CM. Fractures and dislocations of the thoracolumbar spine. In: RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM (Eds.).Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Vol. 2, 5th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2001. p.1543-80
  2. Robertson A, Branfoot T, Barlow IF, Giannoudis PV. Spinal injury patterns resulting from car and motorcycle accidents. Spine. 2002; 27(24): 2825-30
  3. Gertzbein S. Scoliosis Research Society. Multicentre spine fracture study. Spine. 1992; 17(5): 528-40
  4. Benson DR. Thoracolumbar fractures, with emphasis on the burst fracture. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 1988; 230(1): 14-29
  5. Denis F. The three columns of the spine and its significance in the classification of the acute thoracolumbar spine injuries. Spine. 1983; 8(1): 817-31
  6. DeWald RL. Burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 1984; 189(1): 150-61
  7. Akalın S, Kış M, Benli İT, Çıtak M, Mumcu EF, Tüzüner M. Result of the AO spinal internal fixator in the surgical treatment of the thoracolumbar burst fractures. Eur Spine J. 1994; 3(2): 102 – 6
  8. Benli İT, Tandoğan NR, Kış M, Tüzüner M, Mumcu EF, Akalın S, Çıtak M. Cotrel –Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of unstable thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.1994;113(2): 88–92
  9. Kallemeier PM, Beaubien BP, Buttermann GR, Polga DS, Wood RB. In vitro analysis of anterior and posterior fixation in an experimental unstable burst fracture model. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21 (3): 216 – 24
  10. Knop C, Fabian H, Bastian L, Blauth M. Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting. Spine. 2001; 26 (1): 88-9
  11. Marco RA, Kushwaha VP. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentation supplemented with balloon – assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009; 91(1): 20–8
  12. Mariotti AJ, Dwan AD. Current concepts in anterior surgery for thoracolumbar trauma. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002; 33(2): 403 – 12
  13. McLain RF, Burkus JK, Benson DR. Segmental instrumentation for thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures: prospective analysis constructs survival and five – year follow. Spine J. 2001; 1 (5): 310 – 23
  14. Sasani M, Ozer AF. Single – stage posterior corpectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of thoracic or lumbar burst fractures. Spine. 2009; 34 (1): 33 – 40