SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Performance assessment of a combined coal gasification and methanation system with particle swarm optimization method

Sercan YALÇIN
Münür Sacit HERDEM
Pages
490–498
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The system efficiency is estimated at around 49%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Carbon dioxide hydrogenation is a promising method of producing alternative fuels in an environmentally friendly way.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Researchers in the current literature have mainly investigated the performance of carbon dioxide hydrogenation systems that use carbon dioxide from various sources and hydrogen from water electrolysis units.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The system efficiency is estimated at around 49%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Carbon dioxide hydrogenation is a promising method of producing alternative fuels in an environmentally friendly way. Researchers in the current literature have mainly investigated the performance of carbon dioxide hydrogenation systems that use carbon dioxide from various sources and hydrogen from water electrolysis units. In the present study, the performance of a combined coal gasification and methanation unit is investigated to produce methane and power. The carbon dioxide and hydrogen for the methanation unit are provided from the coal gasification system. A Particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is applied to optimize the carbon dioxide and hydrogen values here. Therefore, the water electrolysis unit, which needs high amounts of energy is removed from the system, effectively. The results from the studied system showed that it is possible to produce ~225 kilotons of methane annually by using ~946 kilotons of coal per year. In addition, the results revealed that annual carbon dioxide utilization of ~624.3 kilotons is possible. The system efficiency is estimated at around 49%.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, S., HERDEM, M. S. (2022). Performance assessment of a combined coal gasification and methanation system with particle swarm optimization method. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 490–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/466540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. C. Yılmaz and M. Kanoglu, “Investigation of hydrogen production cost by geothermal energy”, International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5-10, 2017
  2. O. Sen and C. Yılmaz, “Thermodynamic performance analysis of geothermal and solar energy assisted power generation and residential cooling system”, International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 2020
  3. S. Schemme et al., “H2-based synthetic fuels: A techno-economic comparison of alcohol, ether and hydrocarbon production”, International journal of hydrogen energy, Vol. 45, No.8, pp. 5395-5414, 2020
  4. V. Dieterich et al., “Power-to-liquid via synthesis of methanol, DME or Fischer–Tropsch-fuels: a review”, Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 3207-3252, 2020
  5. S. Schemme et al., “Promising catalytic synthesis pathways towards higher alcohols as suitable transport fuels based on H2 and CO2”, Journal of CO2 utilization, Vol. 27, pp. 223-237, 2018
  6. M.S. Herdem et al., “Simulation and modeling of a combined biomass gasification-solar photovoltaic hydrogen production system for methanol synthesis via carbon dioxide hydrogenation”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 219, 113045, 2020
  7. H. Zhang et al., “Techno-economic optimization of CO2-to-methanol with solid-oxide electrolyzer”, Energies, Vol. 12, No. 19, 3742, 2019
  8. J. Kotowicz, M. Brzeczek and D. Wecel, “Analysis of the work of a" renewable" methanol production installation based on h2 from electrolysis and co2 from power plants”, Energy, 119538, 2020
  9. V. Eveloy, “Hybridization of solid oxide electrolysis-based power-to-methane with oxyfuel combustion and carbon dioxide utilization for energy storage”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 108, pp. 550-571, 2019
  10. M. Momeni et al., “A comprehensive analysis of a power-to-gas energy storage unit utilizing captured carbon dioxide as a raw material in a large-scale power plant”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 227, 113613, 2021
  11. S. Hanggi et al., “A review of synthetic fuels for passenger vehicles”, Energy Reports, Vol. 5, pp. 555- 569, 2019
  12. S. Brynolf et al., “Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 81, pp. 1887-1905, 2018
  13. S. Buyrukoğlu, “Promising Cryptocurrency Analysis using Deep Learning”, 5th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), 21-