SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitki Koruma Bülteni / 2000 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1-2

Morphological characteristic of Cercospora beticola (Sacc.) from infected sugar beet leaves and determination of its growth medium

Enfekteli şeker pancarı yapraklarından izole edilen Cercospora beticola Sacc.'nın morfolojik özellikleri ve besi ortamındaki gelişiminin belirlenmesi

Temel GÖKTÜRK
M. Timur DÖKEN
Pages
49–59
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Later on it was found that on certain points the growing hyphal produced stromata where conidia and conidiophore were developed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out at the sugar beet field in Oltu (Erzurum) about 30-50% of the area was infected by Cercospora beticola (Sacc.).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Isolates were collected from the infected sugar beet leaves.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Later on it was found that on certain points the growing hyphal produced stromata where conidia and conidiophore were developed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out at the sugar beet field in Oltu (Erzurum) about 30-50% of the area was infected by Cercospora beticola (Sacc.). Isolates were collected from the infected sugar beet leaves. The collected isolates were transferred into the plates, which contain PDA (Potato Decroze Agar) and SBLA (Sugar Beet Leaves Extract Agar). After the germination, Cercospora beticola (Sacc.) showed differences between conidia and conidiophore sizes. Cercospora beticola sporulated in SB LEA placed on cellophore disc on water agar. Hyphae anastomosis was observed on medium during the extensive growth of hyphae, which formed by germination of conidia placed on cellophore disc on the water agar. Later on it was found that on certain points the growing hyphal produced stromata where conidia and conidiophore were developed.

Özet

Bu çalışma Erzurum yöresinde, Oltu ilçesi ve civarında şeker pancarı üretimi yapılan alanlarda %30-50 ürün kaybına neden olan Cercospora beticola Sacc. hastalık etmeni üzerine araştırmaları kapsamaktadır. Cercospora beticola ile enfekteli şeker pancarı bitkisinin yapraklarından izolatlar elde edilmiş, bu izolatlar enfekteli yaprak dokusu üzerinden alınarak PDA (Patates Dekroz Ağarı) ve SBLEA (Şeker Pancarı Ekstrakt Agarı) besi ortamlarına aktarılmıştır. Besiortamında kültüre alınan Cercospora belicola hastalık etmeninin konidi ve konidiofor boyutlarında farklılıklar belirlenmiştir. SBLEA ortamında sporlandırtlan Cercospora beticold'nm bir kaç konidisi alınarak su ağarı üzerine yerleştirilen selefon disklere konulmuş, selefon diskler üzerine konulan konidilerin çimlendikleri, bazı hiflerin anastomosis oluşturdukları ve zamanla bu hiflerin belirli noktalarda üzerinde konidî ve konidiofor oluşacak olan stomaları oluşturdukları saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTÜRK, T., DÖKEN, M. T. (2022). Morphological characteristic of Cercospora beticola (Sacc.) from infected sugar beet leaves and determination of its growth medium. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1-2, 49–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/466435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alexopoulos, C. J., 1964.
  2. Introductory Mycology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Newyork, London, Sydney. Balis, C and M.G.Payne, 1971. Triglycerides and cercosporine from Cercospora beticola fungal growth and cercosporine production. Phytopathology, 61; 1477-1484.
  3. Bessey, E.A., 1961.
  4. Morphology and Taxonomy of Fungi, Hafner Publishing Company, New York. Brewbaker, H.E., H.L.Bush and R.R.Wood, 1950. A quarter century of progress in sugarbeet improvement by the great western sugar company. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Techno, 6: 202-207.
  5. Calpouzos, L. and G.F.Stalknecht, 1965. Sporulation of C.beticola affected by an interaction between light and temperature. Phytopathology, 55: 1370-1371.
  6. Calpouzos, L. and G.F.Stalknecht, 1966. Phototropism by conidiophores of C.beticola Phytopathology, 56: 702-704.
  7. Carels, N., D.Dekegel, G.Vanheule and P.Lepoivre, 1990. Symptomatological and morphological Study of resistance of wild beet species of the patellares section to C. beticola Sacc. J. Phytopathology,130: 317-330.
  8. Erdem, O., 1992. Cercosporanın mücadelesi üzerine bazı araştırmalar. Şeker Enstitüsü Fitopatoloji Şübesi Seminer Çalışması. Eskişehir, 8 s. Farus, D. E., D.B.Ogden, C.W.Daxtotor and R.H.Helmerich, 1962. Chemical control of Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beets. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol, 12: 43-52.
  9. Göbelez, M., 1963. Türkiye'de Şeker Pancarının Cercospora Mantari Hastığı Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Mars Matbası Ankara, 56 s. İncekara, İ., 1974.
  10. Sistemik Bitki Hastalıkları, Cilt IV. Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak.Yayınları No. 217 s. Kirk, P.M., 1954. Monograph of The Fungus Genus Cercospora beticola. Privalety published. Ithaca, New York, p.111. Kirk, P., 1982. Monograph of the fungus genus Cercospora Plant Pathology, 55: 1234. Lynch, F.J., 1975. The variation regulation and significance of toxin synthesis in the genus Cercospora with pathology reference to Cercospora beticola Ph. D. Thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin. Lynch, F.J. and M.J.Geoghogen, 1978. Environmental regulation of variation in Cercospora beticola Trans. Br. Mycology. Sac. 71(3): 495-496.
  11. McKay, M.B. and V.W.Pool, 1918. Field studies of Cercospora beticola. Phytopathology 8: 119-136.
  12. Oral, E., 1979. Nişasta ve Şekerli Bitki Yetiştiriciliği Tekniği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, 1979.
  13. Pelczar, M.J. and R.D.Ried, 1958.
  14. Microbiology, Mc. Graw Hill book Company, Inc. N.Y., Toronto, London. Precee, T.F., 1959. A staining method for study of appeal infections. Plant Pathology., 8:127-12