Journals / Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences / 2019 /

COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. AND Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy (IRIDACEAE)

Pages
105–113
Publication Date
2019-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there were some differences in morphological and anatomical features, based on similar anatomical and morphological features revealed in the present study, it has been suggested that I. peshmeniana may be a subspecies of I. aucheri.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, morphological and anatomical features of two morphologically similar species (Iris peshmeniana Güner & T.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hall. and Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy) within the Scorpiris Spach subgenus (Juno iris) of the genus Iris L. were determined and similarities and differences between the two species were discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there were some differences in morphological and anatomical features, based on similar anatomical and morphological features revealed in the present study, it has been suggested that I. peshmeniana may be a subspecies of I. aucheri.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Scorpiris taxa · morphology · anatomy

Abstract

In this study, morphological and anatomical features of two morphologically similar species (Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. and Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy) within the Scorpiris Spach subgenus (Juno iris) of the genus Iris L. were determined and similarities and differences between the two species were discussed. Iris peshmeniana is endemic to Turkey and its spreading area is protected because of exctinction threat. Iris aucheri is not endemic to Turkey and it has a limited distribution in the country. The cross-sections from root, scape and leaves and surface-sections from leaves of species were taken. Anatomical and morphological evaluations of the collected and obtained samples revealed differences in plant size, leaf number, width and length, periant tube length, fall length, standard structure, capsule length and width, bract and bracteole structure, length of style branches and testa structure of seeds and in the number of exoderma and cortex layers, margin structure of cortex paranchyma cells, structure of the root center cylinder, xylem strand number, status micropapillae in lower epiderma, layer number of palisade and spongy parenchyma and status of sclerenchyma cap. Although there were some differences in morphological and anatomical features, based on similar anatomical and morphological features revealed in the present study, it has been suggested that I. peshmeniana may be a subspecies of I. aucheri.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Iris L. cinsinin Scorpiris Spach altcinsinde (Juno iris) morfolojik olarak benzer iki türün (Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. ve Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy) morfolojik ve anatomik özellikleri belirlendi ve iki tür arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıklar tartışıldı. Iris peshmeniana Türkiye’ye endemiktir ve tükenme tehlikesi altında olduğundan onun yayılış alanı koruma altındadır. Iris aucheri Türkiye’ye endemik değildir ve ülkede sınırlı bir yayılışa sahiptir. Türlerin kök, skap ve yapraklarından enine kesitler, yapraklardan yüzeysel kesitler alındı. Toplanan ve elde edilen örneklerin anatomik ve morfolojik değerlendirmeleri, bitki boyu, yaprak sayısı, eni ve boyu, periant tüp boyu, dış tepal boyu, iç tepal yapısı, kapsül boyu ve eni, brakte ve brakteol boyu, stilus parçalarının boyu ve tohumların testa yapısı ve eksoderma ve korteks tabakalarının sayısı, korteks parankima hücrelerinin kenar yapısı, kök merkezi silindirin yapısı, ksilem kol sayısı, alt epidermadaki mikropapillaların durumu, palizat ve sünger parankimanın tabaka sayısı ve sklerenkima kümesinin durumundaki farklılıklarla ortaya çıkarıldı. Morfolojik ve anatomik özelliklerdeki bazı farklılıklara rağmen, bu çalışmada ortaya konan benzer morfolojik ve anatomik özelliklere dayanarak I. peshmeniana’nın I. aucheri’nin alttürü olabileceği öne sürülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANDEMİR, N. (2019). COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. AND Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy (IRIDACEAE). Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 105–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/46572

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baytop, T. 1999. Used Medicine Plants in Turkey, pp.137-370. In: (Baytop, T.). Therapy with Plant In Turkey (Past and Present). Nobel Medicine Bookstores, İstanbul, 480 pp
  2. Boltenkov, E.V. 2016. Typification and nomenclatural notes on twenty-eight names of Juno irises (Iridaceae) from Central and South Asian. Phytotaxa, 260: 223-234
  3. Celep, A. 2011. An Anatomical Study On the Genus Iris L. Subgenus Scorpiris Spach. Species Growing in Turkey. Master Thesis. Selcuk University, Science Institute, Konya, 54 pp
  4. Crespo, M.B., Martínez-Azorín, M. & Mavrodiev, E.V. 2015. Can a rainbow consist of a single colour? A new comprehensive generic arrangement of the ‘Iris sensu latissimo’ clade (Iridaceae), congruent with morphology and molecular data. Phytotaxa, 232: 1-78
  5. Çelebioğlu, S. & Baytop, T. 1949. A New Reagent For Microscopical Investigation of Plant. Publication of the Institute of Pharmacognosy, İstanbul, 301 pp
  6. Dönmez, E.O. & Pınar, N.M. 2001. The clypeate polen grains of Turkish Iris (Iridaceae): Subgenus Scorpiris Spach. Turkish Journal of Botany, 25: 57-62
  7. Fang, R., Houghton, P.J. & Hylands, R.L. 2008. Cytotoxic effects of compounds from Iris tectorum on human cancer cell lines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 118: 257-263
  8. Gontova, T.N. & Zatylnikova, O.A. 2013. Comparative morphological and anatomical study of leaves and stems of Iris pseudocorus and Iris sibirica. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Ssiences, 5: 574-578
  9. Guo, J. & Wilson, C.A. 2013. Molecular phylogenetic study of the crested Iris based on five plastid markers. Systematic Botany, 38: 987-995
  10. Guo, J. 2015. Mechanisms for the evolution of complex and diversely elaborated sepals in Iris identified by comparative analysis of developmental sequences. American Jornal of Botany, 102: 819-832
  11. Güner, A. 2012. Iris L., pp. 535-540. In: Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M & Babaç M.T. List of Turkey Plants (Vascular Pants), Publication of Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanic Garden and Floristic Research Society, Istanbul, 1290 pp
  12. Hall, T., Tillie, N. & Chase, M.W. 2001. A re-evalution of the bulbous Irises. Annual of Botany, n.s. Volume 58: 123-126
  13. Kandemir, N. 2015. Leaf anatomical properties of some rare and endemic Iris L. taxa and their reletions: Subgenus Hermodactyloides in Turkey. The Iranian Journal of Botany, 21: 142-151
  14. Kandemir, N. & Yakupoğlu, H. 2016. Morphological and anatomical properties of endemic Iris nezahatiae distributed in