SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Initial Test of the Feasibility and Social Validity of a Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Intervention with Children with, or At-Risk for, Disabilities

Engelli veya Engel Riski Altındaki Çocuklar için Transdiyagnostik Bilişsel Davranışçı Müdahalenin Fizibilite ve Sosyal Geçerlilik Ön Testi

Ashley J. SHAW
Mickey LOSINSKI
Sara A. SANDERS
Pages
87–93
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the programseemed to be more acceptable to teachers and students in the 5th and 6th grades compared to thosein the 3rd and 4th grades.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study sought to determine the feasibility and social validity (acceptability) of a new cognitivebehavioral intervention (CARE) for students in the upper elementary grades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Overall, the programseemed to be more acceptable to teachers and students in the 5th and 6th grades compared to thosein the 3rd and 4th grades.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the following we will discuss the results with respect to the research questionsand provide limitations and future directions for research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study sought to determine the feasibility and social validity (acceptability) of a new cognitivebehavioral intervention (CARE) for students in the upper elementary grades. Results of the studyshowed the program to be both feasible and acceptable by school stakeholders. Overall, the programseemed to be more acceptable to teachers and students in the 5th and 6th grades compared to thosein the 3rd and 4th grades. Student outcomes were varied, with 3 of the 5 students experiencingvisually compelling reductions in problem behaviors, while the other two maintained their baselineproblem behaviors. In the following we will discuss the results with respect to the research questionsand provide limitations and future directions for research.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ilköğretim sınıflarındaki öğrenciler için yeni bir bilişsel davranışsal müdahalenin (CARE) uygulanabilirliğini ve sosyal geçerliliğini (kabul edilebilirliği) belirlemeye çalışmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, programın okul paydaşları tarafından hem uygulanabilir hem de kabul edilebilir olduğunu göstermiştir. Genel olarak, program 5. ve 6. sınıftaki öğretmenler ve öğrenciler için 3. ve 4. sınıflardakilere göre daha kabul edilebilir gibi görünmektedir. Öğrencilerin sonuçları değişkendir, 5 öğrenciden 3’ü görsel olarak zorlayıcı problem davranışlarında azalmalar yaşarken, diğer ikisi temel problem davranışlarını sürdürmüştür. Aşağıda araştırma sorusuna ilişkin sonuçları tartışacak, çalışmanın kısıtlılıklarından ve gelecek çalışmalara verebileceği yönlerden bahsedeceğiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHAW, A. J., LOSINSKI, M., SANDERS, S. A. (2022). Initial Test of the Feasibility and Social Validity of a Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Intervention with Children with, or At-Risk for, Disabilities. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 87–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/465401

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., Ivanova, M. Y., & Rescorla, L. A. (2011). Manual for the ASEBA brief problem monitor (BPM). University of Vermont, Burlington, VT: ASEBA. Authors (2018). School-personnel directed cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication. Barrett, P. (2005). FRIENDS for Life: Group leaders’ manual for children. Brisbane: Barrett Research Resources Pty Ltd. Briesch, A. M., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Children’s Usage Rating Profile (Actual). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. Chafouleas, S. M., Briesch, A. M. Neugebauer, S. R. & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2011). Usage Rating Profile – Intervention (Revised). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K.-E., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Tai, R. H. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18(3), 223-244. https://doi. org/10.1177/152822x06289161 Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  2. Kennedy, C.H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon. Lewin, A. B., Peris, T. S., Bergman, R. L., McCracken, J. T., & Piacentini, J. (2011). The role of treatment expectancy in youth receiving exposure-based CBT for obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(9), 536-543. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.001 March, J. S., Silva, S., Petrycki, S., Curry, J., Wells, K., Fairbank, J.,. & Severe, J. (2007). The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS): long-term effectiveness and safety outcomes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(10), 1132-1144. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1132
  3. Piper, B., Gray, H., Raber, J., & Birkett, M. (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Brief Problem Monitor: An Abbreviated Form of the Child Behavior Checklist. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 68, 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12188
  4. Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., & Pustejovsky, J. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsp.2013.11.005 Weist, M.