SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Socio-Cultural Preconditions of Velvet Revolutions in Central Europe and Ukraine

YAROSLAV PASKO
HENNADII KORZHOV
Pages
753–780
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The weakness of the intellectual community in Ukraine, its dependence on colonial discourse has led to a serious complication of the processes of post-communist renewal and of the crystallization of the foundations of civil society in the newly established Ukrainian stat

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The focus of the research is on the theoretical and historical background as well as socio-cultural preconditions of revolutionary events in Central Europe and Ukraine in 1989-1991.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Having powerful traditional and modern components, civil society in Central Europe acted as a culturally conditioned European social institution that shaped political objectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The weakness of the intellectual community in Ukraine, its dependence on colonial discourse has led to a serious complication of the processes of post-communist renewal and of the crystallization of the foundations of civil society in the newly established Ukrainian stat
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The focus of the research is on the theoretical and historical background as well as socio-cultural preconditions of revolutionary events in Central Europe and Ukraine in 1989-1991. Having powerful traditional and modern components, civil society in Central Europe acted as a culturally conditioned European social institution that shaped political objectives. On the contrary, due to weak intellectual reflection, Ukrainian society lacked theoretical conceptualization and cultural preconditions for deep political changes. The moral-regulatory and descriptive conditions for the development of civil society have not been fully implemented. Intellectuals were the leading force in the socio-cultural and historical changes in Central European countries. The weakness of the intellectual community in Ukraine, its dependence on colonial discourse has led to a serious complication of the processes of post-communist renewal and of the crystallization of the foundations of civil society in the newly established Ukrainian stat

🔖

Cite This Article

PASKO, Y., KORZHOV, H. (2022). Socio-Cultural Preconditions of Velvet Revolutions in Central Europe and Ukraine. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 753–780. https://ajindex.com/articles/463774

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akkerman, B. (1992). The Future of Liberal Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  2. Andrukhovych, Yu. (2007). Moya Yevropa. Lviv: VNTL-Klassyk Andruchowytsch, J. (2002). Europa wyobraźni. Dyskusja. Slowo polskie, 23.05. Arato, A. (1984). The Democratic Theory of the Polish Opposition: Normative Intentions and Strategic Ambiguities. Working paper 15, April. Notre Dame: Kellog Institute. Aron, R. (1994). In Defense of Political Reason: Essays. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Bakuła, B. (2011). Polska i kolonialna przeszłość dzisiaj. Nowa Krytyka, 26-27, 145- 180. Bilotserkivets’, N. (1998). Kryven’ka kachechka, abo Shche raz pro tragediyu Tsentral’no-Skhidnoyi Yevropy. Krytyka, 2(4), 4-6.
  3. Bob, C. (2005). The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bolton, J. (2014). Worlds of Dissent. Charter 77, the Plastic People of the Universe, and Czech Culture under Communism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  5. Brzechczyn, K. (2020). The Historical Distinctiveness of Central Europe. A Study in the Philosophy of History. Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien: Peter Lang.Chornovil, V. (1967). Lykho z rozumu. Portrety dvadtziaty zlochyntsiv. Paris.Dobrzański, D. (2013). Zasada solidarności. Studium z filozofii społecznej. Poznan: Wyd.Naukowe UAM. Dzielski, M. (1985). Odrodzenie ducha – budowa wolności: Pisma zebrane. Kraków: Znak. Dzyuba, I. (1998). Internatsionalizm chy rusyfikatsiya? Kyiv: Kyyevo-Mohylianska akademiya. Eisenstadt, S. (2009). Utopia i nowoczesność: porównawcza analiza cywilizacji. Warszawa: Oficyna naukowa. Franko, I. (1910). Z kintsem roku. Moloda Ukrayina. Lviv: Ukr. Rus. vyd. spilka. Gouldner, A. (1980). The Two Marxisms: Contradictions and Anomalies in the Development of Theory. New York: Palgrave. Górski, E. (2006). John Paul II’s Idea of Universalism. Dialogue and Universalism, 16, 7-34. Doi: 10.5840/du20061611/122 Gundorova, T. (2013). Tranzytna kul’tura. Symptomy postkolonial’noyi travmy. Kyiv:Grani-T. Habermas, J. (1984) (1981).
  6. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, Mass: Beacon Press.
  7. Havel, V. (1985) [1978]. The Power of the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Central-Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M.E.Sarpe. Hroch, M. (1990). How Much Does Nation Formation Depend on Nationalism? East European Politics and Sovieties, 4 (1), 101-115.
  8. Hrytsak, Y. (2014). Revolution der Wurde. Maid