Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Community of Values as a Key Factor of Decolonization

Pages
25–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the contrary, Polish Solidarity can be considered a successful anti-colonial community which through its powerful intellectual reflection and re-thinking of the historical past has been able to offer society a valuable vision of change and to uphold its practical realization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article deals with the problems of decolonization in Poland and Ukraine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the institutional and life-world (Lebenswelt) levels the values and principles that were extremely relevant during the events of the 2014 Revolution of Dig-nity and led to the overthrow of the Yanukovich colonial regime are currently ignored.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the contrary, Polish Solidarity can be considered a successful anti-colonial community which through its powerful intellectual reflection and re-thinking of the historical past has been able to offer society a valuable vision of change and to uphold its practical realization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The article deals with the problems of decolonization in Poland and Ukraine. The relationship between the moral-regulatory and functional founda-tions of the development of national communities in the process of eliminating colonization heritage is scrutinized. The authors endeavor to analyze the con-trast between the two versions of decolonization embodied by the most active forces of social change in the two states: Solidarity and Maidan communities. These social groups act as bearers of certain intellectual and social visions of the future, representing certain historical and value markers. The article gener-alizes theoretical approaches related to Central European and Russian socio-cultural influences relating to the formation of the values of freedom that con-flict with the dimensions of clientelism and subjugation. The research confirms that Ukrainian society mostly neglects the heritage of Central European com-munities: communitarian social experience, solidarity, and social pragmatism. At the institutional and life-world (Lebenswelt) levels the values and principles that were extremely relevant during the events of the 2014 Revolution of Dig-nity and led to the overthrow of the Yanukovich colonial regime are currently ignored. On the contrary, Polish Solidarity can be considered a successful anti-colonial community which through its powerful intellectual reflection and re-thinking of the historical past has been able to offer society a valuable vision of change and to uphold its practical realization.

🔖

Cite This Article

PASKO, Y., KORZHOV, G. (2020). Community of Values as a Key Factor of Decolonization. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 25–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/142640

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Arato, A. (1984). The Democratic Theory of the Polish Opposition: Normative Intentions and Strategic Ambiguities. Working Paper 15, April, Kellog Insti-tute. Ashcroft, B. & Griffiths, G. & Tiffin, H. (2002). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. London & New York: Routledge. Bhabha, H. (2004). The Location of Culture. Abingdon: Routledge. Bottici, C. (2014). Imaginal Politics: Images beyond Imagination and the Imagi-nary. Washington: Columbia University Press. Dobrzański, D. (2013). Zasada Solidarności: Studium z Filozofii Społecznej. Poznan: Wyd. Naukowe UAM. Dzielski, M. (1995). Polityka Polska Dziś. Odrodzenie Ducha-Budowa Wolności: Pisma Zebrane. Kraków: Krakowskie Towarzystwo Przemysłowe, Znak, 919-943.
  2. Dzyuba, I. (1998). Internationalism or Russification? Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Etkind, A. (2011). Internal Colonization: The Imperial Experience of Russia. Moscow: Literaturnoye Obozreniye. Geremek, Bronisław. (1994). Spoleczeństwo Obywatelskie i Wspólczesność. Eu-ropa i Społeczeństwo Obywatelskie. Kraków: Znak. Hnatiuk, O. (2005). Farewell to Empire: Ukrainian Discussions on Identity. Kyiv: Osnovy. Hrytsak, Y. (2015). The Postcolonial is Not Enough. Slaviс Review, 4, 733-734.
  3. Hundorova, T. (2007). Postcolonial Ressentiment: the Ukrainian Case. From Sovietology to Postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a Postcolonial Perspective. (Ed. J. Korek). Huddinge: Södertörns Högskola, 103-113.
  4. John Paul II (1996). The Social Teaching of the Church as the Integral Part of its Mis-sion. Rome: Fundacia Jana Pavla II, Osrodec Documentacji Pontificatu. https://pbn.nauka.gov.pl/ sedno-webapp/persons/1552204/?& pageNo=2. Kappeler, A. (2001). The Russian Empire: A Multiethnic History. London: Routledge. Khrypko, S. & Iatsenko, G. (2019). Philosophy of a Surname: Ukrainian Con-text. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9 (4), 899-912. Król, M. (1991). Święty Piotr i John Stuart Mill: Nowożytny Spór Między Ści-jaństwem a Liberalizmem. Res Publica, 46 (9-10), 2-23. Król, M. (1992). Liberalizm Strachu czy Liberalizm Odwagi. Kraków, Znak. Król, M. (1993). Między Korporacją a Społeczeństwem Obywatelskim. Obywatel: Odrodzenie Pojęcia. (Ed. B. Markiewicz). Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjo-logii PAN. Lis, R. (2007). Fenomen Narodzin Spoleczeństwa Obywatelskiego w Polsce Ok-resu Schyłkowego Kommunizmu. Czas Społeczeństwa Obywatelskiego. Między Teorią a Praktyką. (Ed. P. Borowiec & B. Krauz-Mozer). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uni