SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Idea Evaluation in Innovation Management for the New Normal in Banking: A Case Study in Vakıfbank

Bankacılıkta Yeni Normal için İnovasyon Yönetimi Kapsamında Fikir Değerlendirmesi : Vakıfbank’ta Bir Örnek Olay

Çağlar Üçler
Şenay Demirel
Süha Erdem Yabaş
Sait Şener
Metin Recep Zafer
Pages
1–26
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed that the satisfaction level and innovation commitment of the employees were increased with the new system as well

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Banking environment, traditional with an established physically collocated work culture, has been dis- rupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, the culture of innovation has been fostered, innovation management metrics were improved significantly and both the number of sessions and ideas presented in the sessions were found to be increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed that the satisfaction level and innovation commitment of the employees were increased with the new system as well
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Banking environment, traditional with an established physically collocated work culture, has been dis- rupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. It triggered the evolution of innovation management processes to handle the issues related to spatial spread, fuzziness and collective information development during idea evaluation. In this paper, Vakıfbank Innovation Management System (V-IMS) was exemplified utilizing ICT for virtual collaboration, MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) methods within stage-gates, transforming knowledge and exploiting collaboration at the fuzzy front end. There, physically collocated work culture was transformed into delocated collaboration with an agile approach utilizing lean information flow, which emphasizes the people exchanging tacit into explicit knowledge on the move rather than long documen- tations. Moreover, the culture of innovation has been fostered, innovation management metrics were improved significantly and both the number of sessions and ideas presented in the sessions were found to be increased. It was observed that the satisfaction level and innovation commitment of the employees were increased with the new system as well

Özet

COVID-19 salgını, fiziksel olarak yerleşik bir çalışma kültürüne sahip geleneksel bankacılık ortamını etki- lemiştir. Salgın nedeni ile inovasyon yönetimi süreçlerinin gelişmesi ve mekansal yayılma, belirsizlik ve toplu bilgi geliştirme gibi sorunları ele alması gerekmiştir. Bu çalışmada, VakıfBank İnovasyon Yönetim Sistemi (V-IMS) üzerinde, sanal işbirliği için BT kullanımı, karar noktalarında MCDM yöntemleri kullanımı, zımni açık bilgi ve bulanık ön uçta uzak işbirliği dönüşümü örneklendirilmiştir. Bu sistemde, fiziksel olarak yan yana yerleştirilmiş çalışma kültürü, insanların uzun belgelerden ziyade hareket halindeyken zımni bilgi alışverişini vurgulayan yalın bilgi akışını kullanan çevik bir yaklaşımla ayrık işbirliğine dönüştürülmüştür. Ayrıca inovas- yon kültürü teşvik edilmiş, inovasyon yönetimi ölçütleri önemli ölçüde iyileştirilmiş ve hem oturum sayısı hem de oturumlarda sunulan fikirlerin arttığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca yeni sistemle birlikte çalışanların memnuniyet düzeylerinin ve yenilik bağlılıklarının arttığı da gözlemlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

Üçler, Ç., Demirel, Ş., Yabaş, S. E., Şener, S., Zafer, M. R. (2022). Idea Evaluation in Innovation Management for the New Normal in Banking: A Case Study in Vakıfbank. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/463229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management meas- urement: A review. International journal of management reviews, 8(1), 21- 47
  2. Adamides, E. D., Karacapilidis, N. (2006) “Information Technology Support for the Knowledge and Social Processes of Innovation Management”, Tech- novation, vol. 26, pp. 50-59
  3. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S. & Taha, Z. (2009), “Virtual teams: a literature re- view,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), pp. 2653-2669
  4. Alexandru Spatariu, K.H., Bendixen, L. D., (2004). ”Defining and measuring quality in online discussions Journal of Interactive Online Learning 2 (4)
  5. Amit R. & Zott C. (2012), “Creating value through business model innova- tion”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49
  6. Arnaboldi F., Rossignoli B., (2015) “Bank risk, governance and regulation”, Springer 7. Belliveau P., Griffin A and Somermeyer, S.M. (2004) The PDMA Toolbook for New Product Develeopment, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons
  7. Bose, R.(2003), “Group support systems: technologies and products selec- tion”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 649- 656
  8. Börjesson, S., Dahlsten, F., and Williander, M. (2006), “Innovative scanning experiences from an idea generation project at Volvo Cars”, Technovation, 26(7), 775- 783
  9. Brem A. and Voigt K. (2007) ‘Innovation Management in Emerging Tech- nology Ventures – the concept of an integrated idea manag ement’, Int. J. Technology, Policy and Management, Vol 7. No 3. 2007 11. Bröring, S., Cloutier, L.M., and Leker, J. (2006), “The front end of innovation in an era of industry convergence: evidence from nutraceuticals and func- tional foods”, R&D Management, 36(5), 487-498
  10. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. & Ollus, M. (2008), “ECOLEAD and CNO base concepts,” in Methods and tools for collaborative networked or- ganizations, pp. 3-32. Springer, US
  11. Casanueva, C., Castro, I. and Galán, J.L. (2013), “Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters,” Journal of Business Research, 66(5), pp. 603–613
  12. Chao, R.O. and Kavadias, S. (2008), “A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets”, Management Science, 54(5), 907-921
  13. Christensen, C., Magnusson, M.G., Zetherstrom, M.B. (2003), “Implementa- tion and Use of Collaborative Product Development Systems—Observations from Swedish Manufacturing Firms”, Department of Innovation Engineer- ing a