Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Factors Affecting Household Cash Usage in Turkey

Türkiye’de Hanehalkı Nakit Kullanımını Belirleyen Faktörler

Pages
63–86
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that the individuals stating that cash usage contributes to budget controlling and safety are more likely to use cash.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates cash usage in POS transactions by analyzing the data of the Methods of Payment Survey conducted by CBRT in 2020.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The probit model shows that demographic factors, transactional characteristics, and attitudes judgments towards cash affect individuals’ preference to pay with cash.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results demonstrate that the individuals stating that cash usage contributes to budget controlling and safety are more likely to use cash.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates cash usage in POS transactions by analyzing the data of the Methods of Payment Survey conducted by CBRT in 2020. The probit model shows that demographic factors, transactional characteristics, and attitudes judgments towards cash affect individuals’ preference to pay with cash. The main finding of the study is that attitudes and judgments arising from the features of cash that distinguish cash from other payment methods are explanatory, in addition to demographic and transac- tion characteristics. The results demonstrate that the individuals stating that cash usage contributes to budget controlling and safety are more likely to use cash.

Özet

Bu çalışmada alışverişlerdeki ödemelerde nakit kullanımında etkili olan faktörler TCMB tarafından 2020 yılında gerçekleştirilen Nakit Kullanım Alışkanlıkları Anketi verileri kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Probit model; demografik faktörlerin, işleme ilişkin özelliklerin ve nakde ilişkin tutum ve yargıların kişilerin nakit ile ödeme yapma tercihinde belirleyi- ci olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışmanın ana bulgusu; demografi ve işlem özelliklerine ek olarak, nakdi diğer ödeme yöntemlerinden ayıran özelliklerden kaynaklanan tutum ve yargıların nakit kullanma tercihinde açıklayıcı oluşudur. Sonuçlar, nakit kullandığında bütçe kontrolü sağlanacağını ve nakdin diğer ödeme yöntemlerine göre daha güvenli ol- duğunu düşünenlerin nakit kullanma olasılığının daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çevik, S., Doğrukök, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Household Cash Usage in Turkey. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 63–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/463224

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Almanya Merkez Bankası. (2017). Payment behaviour in Germany in 2017
  2. Arango, C. A., Bouhdaoui, Y., Bounie, D., Eschelbach, M., & Hernández, L. (2016). Cash management and payment choices: a simulation model with international comparisons
  3. Arango, C., Hogg, D., & Lee, A. (2012). Why is cash (still) so entrenched? Insights from the Bank of Canada’s 2009 methods-of-payment survey (No. 2012-2). Bank of Canada
  4. Bagnall, J., Bounie, D., Huynh, K. P., Kosse, A., Schmidt, T., Schuh, S. D., & Stix, H. (2014). Consumer cash usage: A cross-country comparison with pay- ment diary survey data
  5. Bouhdaoui, Y., Bounie, D., & François, A. (2014). Convenient prices, cash payments and price rigidity. Economic Modelling, 41, 329-337
  6. Bounie, D., & François, A. (2006). Cash, check or bank card? The effects of transaction characteristics on the use of payment instruments. Telecom Paris Economics and Social Sciences Working Paper No. ESS-06-05
  7. Deutsche Bundesbank, 2019. Cash in the Shadow Economy 8. Eschelbach, M., & Schmidt, T. (2013). Precautionary motives in short-term cash management: Evidence from German POS transactions
  8. Esselink, H., & Hernández, L. (2017). The use of cash by households in the euro area. European Central Bank
  9. Fransa Merkez Bankası. (2018). Use of cash in France: the payment method of choice for low-value purchases. Quarterly selection of articles-Bulletin de la Banque de France, (220), 1-9
  10. Franz Seitz & Hans-Eggert Reimers & Friedrich Schneider, 2018. “Cash in Cir- culation and the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Investigation for Euro Area Countries and Beyond,” CESifo Working Paper Series 7143, CESifo
  11. Fujiki, H. (2020). Cash demand and financial literacy: A case study using Japa- nese survey data. Japan and the World Economy, 54, 100998
  12. Fujiki, H., & Tanaka, M. (2018). How do we choose to pay using evolving retail payment technologies? Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 49, 85-99
  13. Jonker, N. (2007). Payment instruments as perceived by consumers–results from a household survey. De Economist, 155(3), 271-303
  14. Kahn, C., Quinn, S., & Roberds, W. (2014, June). Central banks and payment systems: the evolving trade-off between cost and risk. In Norges Bank Con- ference on the Uses of Central Banks: Lessons from History, June (pp. 5-6)
  15. Kim, L., Kumar, R., & O’Brien, S. (2020). Findings from the Diary of Consumer Payment Choice. Cash Product Office Federal Reserve Syst