Journals / Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Incision Size in Lumbar Disc Surgery on Post-operative Paraspinal Muscle Healing

Lomber Disk Cerrahisinde İnsizyon Büyüklüğünün Ameliyat Sonrası Paraspinal Adale İyileşmesine Etkisi

Pages
71–77
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In this clinical study, the minimization of muscle atrophy suggests that performing microdiscectomy with small retractor and small incision has muscle tissue protective properties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study, the effect of the use of smaller incision and smaller retractor in subperiosteal microdiscectomy technique on muscle healing and quality of life is investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This retrospective study is conducted on 100 patients who underwent surgery with the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation in Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In this clinical study, the minimization of muscle atrophy suggests that performing microdiscectomy with small retractor and small incision has muscle tissue protective properties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In this study, the effect of the use of smaller incision and smaller retractor in subperiosteal microdiscectomy technique on muscle healing and quality of life is investigated. Material and Methods: This retrospective study is conducted on 100 patients who underwent surgery with the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation in Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery. In this study, two groups were formed and result was obtained by comparing the postoperative lumbar MR images of the two groups. Results: It was observed that the size of the retractor used in surgery and the size of the incision had a statistically significant effect on paraspinal muscular atrophy (p < 0.001). It was observed that the size of the retractor and incision had no statistically significant effect on paraspinal muscle atrophy in patients with systemic disease (p = 0.052). Conclusion: In this clinical study, the minimization of muscle atrophy suggests that performing microdiscectomy with small retractor and small incision has muscle tissue protective properties.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada subperiostal mikrodiskektomi tekniğinde daha küçük insizyon ve daha küçük ekartör kullanımının paraspinal adele iyileşmesi ve yaşam kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Nöroşirürji Anabilim Dalı’nda lomber disk hernisi tanısı ile ameliyat edilen 100 hasta üzerinde retroprospektif olarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmada iki ayrı grup oluşturulmuş ve her iki grubun postoperatif lomber Manyetik rezonans (MR) görüntüleri karşılaştırılarak sonuca varılmıştır. Bulgular: Cerrahide kullanılan ekartörün ve insizyonun büyüklüğünün paraspinal adele atrofisi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde etkisinin olduğu gözlenmiştir (p < 0.001). Sistemik hastalığı olan hastalarda ekartör ve insizyonun büyüklüğünün paraspinal kas atrofisi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde etkisinin olmadığı gözlemiştir (p = 0.052). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada mikrodiskektominin küçük retraktör ve küçük insizyon kullanılarak yapılmasının paraspinal kas atrofisi gelişmesinin en aza indirilebilmiş olması, kas dokusu üzerinde koruyucu etkileri olduğunu işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, Ş., AYDOĞMUŞ, E., KESKİN, E., AÇIKGÖZ, B., KALAYCI, M., AYDIN, H. A., ŞİMŞEK, K. (2022). The Effect of Incision Size in Lumbar Disc Surgery on Post-operative Paraspinal Muscle Healing. Batı Karadeniz Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 71–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/463150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zileli M ve İş M. Lomber disk hernisinde cerrahi teknik. Omurilik ve omurga cerrahisi cilt 1 3. Baskı, İzmir, İntertıp yayınevi; 2014, 661
  2. Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: A historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16:1-10
  3. Özer A.F ve Palaoğlu S. Mikrolomber diskektomi. Omurilik ve omurga cerrahisi cilt 1 3. Baskı, İzmir, İntertıp yayınevi; 2014, 669
  4. Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Lumbar Disc Adult Hydrocephalus. 1977;152:74-80
  5. Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between macrodiscectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(5):344-347
  6. T Sihvonen, A Herno, L Paljärvi, O Airaksinen, J Partanen, A Tapaninaho. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(5):575-581
  7. Xinyu Liu, Wang Y, Wu X, et al. Impact of surgical approaches on the lumbar multifidus muscle: An experimental study using sheep as models. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(5):570-576
  8. Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee C-S. MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(5):479-486
  9. Laasonen EM. Atrophy of sacrospinal muscle groups in patients with chronic, diffusely radiating lumbar back pain. Neuroradiology. 1984;26(1):9-13
  10. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, et al. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(1):33-36
  11. Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Parkkola R, et al. Cross-sectional areas of lumbar muscles after surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A study with magnetic resonance imaging after microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;133(1-2):7-12
  12. Ryang YM, Oertel MF, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V. Standart open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: Results of a prospective raddomized study. Eurosurgery. 2008;62(1):174-181
  13. Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J. Lumbar microdiscectomy: A historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13(2):E3
  14. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, Olmarker K, et al. Back muscl