SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

ENFORCING FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS AGAINST THIRD PARTIES

Yabancı Hakem Kararlarının Üçüncü Kişilere Karşı Tenfizi

Banu ŞİT KÖŞGEROĞLU
Pages
1–30
Publication Date
2011-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Extension of arbitration agreement and the position of third parties in general is examined in this study from the viewpoint of enforcement

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Extension of arbitration agreements to third parties constitutes one of the current topics of arbitration law.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Third party participation in arbitration has the requirement of enforcement against third parties as well.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Extension of arbitration agreement and the position of third parties in general is examined in this study from the viewpoint of enforcement
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tahkim · tahkim anlaşmasının teşmili · üçüncü kişilere karşı tenfiz

Abstract

Extension of arbitration agreements to third parties constitutes one of the current topics of arbitration law. Third party participation in arbitration has the requirement of enforcement against third parties as well. Although there are very exceptional and few cases, enforcement against persons who are not involved in the arbitration should also be considered in this context. Extension of arbitration agreement and the position of third parties in general is examined in this study from the viewpoint of enforcement

Özet

Tahkim anlaşmasının üçüncü kişilere teşmili uygulaması tahkim hukuku alanındaki güncel konulardan biridir. Üçüncü kişilerin tahkim yargılamasına dahil edilmesi, hakem kararlarının üçüncü kişilere karşı tenfi zi gereğini beraberinde getirmektedir. Ancak hakem kararları sadece tahkim anlaşmasının teşmili suretiyle yargılamaya dahil olan üçüncü kişilere karşı değil, aynı zamanda tahkim yargılamasında yer almayan üçüncü kişilere karşı da istisnai de olsa tenfi z edilebilmektedir. Tenfi z açısından tahkim anlaşmasının teşmili ve üçüncü kişilerin durumu bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖŞGEROĞLU, B. Ş. (2011). ENFORCING FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS AGAINST THIRD PARTIES. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/462806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akıncı, Z.: Milletlerarası Tahkim, Ankara 2007.
  2. Bagot, M. H./Henderson, D. A.: Not Party, Not Bound? Not Necessarily: Binding Third Parties to Maritime Arbitration, Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2001-2002, Vol. 26, s. 414-461.
  3. Bamforth, R./Tymczyszyn, I./Fleet, A. V./Correro, M. A.: Joining Non- Signatories to an Arbitration: Recent Developments, Dispute Resolution 2007/08, Vol. 2: Arbitration, s. 9-13.
  4. Bevilacqua, T.: Voluntary Intervention and Other Participation of Third Parties in Ongoing International Arbitrations: A Survey of the Current State of Play, World Arbitration and Mediaton Review, 2007, Vol 1. No. 4, s. 507-537.
  5. Born, G. B.: International Commercial Arbitration – Commentary and Materials, The Hague 2001.
  6. Courtney, T.: Binding Non-Signatories to International Arbitration Agreements: Raising Fundamental Concerns in the United States and Abroad, Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business, 2009, Vol. 8:4, s. 581-594.
  7. Eisen, C.L.: What Arbitration Agreement? Compelling Non-Signatories to Arbitrate, Dispute Resolution Journal, 2001, May/July 2001, s. 42-45.
  8. Ekşi, N.: Milletlerarası Deniz Ticareti Alanında “Incorporation” Yoluyla Yapılan Tahkim Anlaşmaları, İstanbul 2004.
  9. Esen, E.: Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Tahkim Anlaşmasının Üçüncü Kişilere Teşmili, İstanbul 2008.
  10. Fouchard, P./Gaillard, E./Goldman, B./Savage, J.: Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, The Hague 1999.
  11. Garfi nkel, B. H./Herlihy, D.: Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places: The Second Circuit’s Decision in Sarhank Group v. Oracle Corporaton, Commentary, Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, 2005, Vol. 20, No. 6, s. 1-4.
  12. Hanotiau, B.: Problems Raised by Complex Arbitrations Involving Multiple Contracts – Parties – Issues, Journal of International Arbitration, 2001, Vol. 18, S. 3, s.251-360.
  13. Kalpsüz, T.: Türkiye’de Milletlerarası Tahkim, Ankara 2007.
  14. Kuru, B.: Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, C. VI, İstanbul 2001.
  15. Kuru, B./Arslan, R./Yılmaz, E.: Medeni Usul Hukuku, Ders Kitabı, B. 14, Ankara 2002.
  16. Lamm, C. B./ Aqua, J. A.: Defi ning the Party – Who is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration Before AAA and Other International Institutions, George Washington International Law Review, 2002-2003, Vol. 34, s. 711-741.
  17. Levine, E.: Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third-Party Participation, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2011, Vol. 29:1, s. 200-224.
  18. Lew, D. M. J./Loukas, A./Mistelis, S. K.: