Journals / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Açık Yeşil Alanların Kullanıcılara Sunduğu Olanakların Değerlendirilmesi: Kocaeli / Türkiye Örneği

Evaluation of the opportunities offered by open-green spaces for urban users: A Kocaeli /Turkey Sample

Pages
32–40
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Survey results concluded that the majority of the users, which is 30.20 %, find the reinforcement elements, directional signs and security insufficient

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As an industrial city, Kocaeli contains a wide variety of people from different socio-cultural backgrounds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study 650 people were randomly selected to participate in a face to face interviewbased survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Survey results concluded that the majority of the users, which is 30.20 %, find the reinforcement elements, directional signs and security insufficient
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As an industrial city, Kocaeli contains a wide variety of people from different socio-cultural backgrounds. The diversity of the population diversifies the expectations of the inhabitants for urban spaces. We studied the satisfaction and dissatisfaction status and expectations of Kocaeli inhabitants for the parks located in urban open-green spaces. In this study 650 people were randomly selected to participate in a face to face interviewbased survey. The data obtained from the questionnaire was used for frequency distribution analysis, factor analysis, reliability analysis and correlation analysis. Recreational activities form the most important satisfaction factor in the study, and this factor is closely related with the gender, occupation, and economic status of the users and the time spent in spaces. Users mostly spent time in the parks during the summer (49.85%), particularly during weekends (57.80 %), for the purposes of hiking, eating and exercising (28.05 %). Management and infrastructural factors have caused dissatisfaction. Survey results concluded that the majority of the users, which is 30.20 %, find the reinforcement elements, directional signs and security insufficient

Özet

Kocaeli ili bir sanayi kenti olması nedeniyle çok çeşitli sosyo kültürel yapıdaki insanı içerisinde barındırmaktadır. Nüfusun bu çeşitliliği kent halkının kentsel mekanlardan beklentilerini de çeşitlendirmektedir. Bu araştırma Kocaeli kent halkının kentsel açık yeşil alanlar içerisinde yer alan parklardan memnuniyet ve memnuniyetsizlik durumlarını ve beklentilerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada rasgele seçilmiş, yüzyüze görüşmeye dayalı 650 kişi ile anket yapılmıştır. Anketlerden elde edilen veriler frekans dağılımı, faktör analizi, güvenirlilik analizi ve korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Rekreasyonel faaliyetler memnuniyet faktöründe en önemli faktörü oluşturmuş ve kullanıcıların cinsiyet, meslek, gelir ve alanda geçirdikleri zaman ile ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Kullanıcılar parkları, en fazla yaz aylarında (% 49.85), özellikle hafta sonlarında (% 57.80) ve yürümek, yemek yemek, spor amaçlı (% 28.05) olarak kullandıkları belirlenmiştir. Memnuniyetsizlik faktörlerinde ise yönetim ve alt yapı faktörleri ön plana çıkmıştır. Ankete göre kullanıcıların % 30.20 'lik büyük bir kısmı donatı elemanlarının, yönlendirme levhalarının ve güvenliğin yetersiz olduğu söylemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDENİZ, N. S., ÇELİK, A. (2022). Açık Yeşil Alanların Kullanıcılara Sunduğu Olanakların Değerlendirilmesi: Kocaeli / Türkiye Örneği. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 32–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/461951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akdeniz NS, Çelik A, Nemutlu FE (2013). Planting design in the pedestrian walk, the symbol of Kocaeli province. J. of Food, Agric.& Environ. (1): 25-732.
  2. Aksoy Y, Akpınar A (2011). Research about public green area use and green area demand in Istanbul Fatih district. Istanbul Commerce University, J. of Science, (20): 81-96.
  3. Armstrong, R., De Vaal, N., Reynolds,J., Taylor, S., Wilson, J., Boggs, M., Mcleod, B. and Ketcheson, L. (2012). Measurıng customer value and satısfactıon for parks and recreatıon:A manual. http://www.prontario. org/index.php/ci_id/ 8024.htm. Belkayalı N, Güloğlu Y, Sevik H (2015). What affects perceptions of local residents toward protected areas? A case study from Kure Mountains National Park, Turkey. Int. Journal of Sust. Develop & World Ecol. (5): 1-9.
  4. Bilgili BC (2011). An investigation on evaluation and improvement of the usage recreational areas of the historical Park of Antakya. Mustafa Kemal University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Landscape Architecture, Master's thesis. Antakya/Hatay. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999). Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas. Ecolog. Econom. (29): 293-301.
  5. Borrie WT, Birzell RM (2001). Approaches to measuring quality of the wilderness experience. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p020/rmrs_p020_029_038).
  6. Boyacigil O, Altunkasa MF (2010). Determining Effective Public Recreation Opportunities: A Case Study in Iskenderun (Hatay). Ecology, (74): 110-121.
  7. Bulut Z, Kilicarslan C, Deniz B, Kara B (2010). Urban ecosystems sustainability and open green spaces. III. National Black Sea Forestry Congress. IV, 1484-1493.
  8. Burns RC, Graefe AR, Absher ID, Titre J (1998). Water-Based recreationists’ attitudes regarding customer satisfaction: differences between selected market segments. Proceedings of the 1998 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, New York, GTR-NE-255. Chiesura A (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning (1): 129- 138. Cole ST, Crompton JL (2003). A conceptualization of the relationships between service quality and visitor satisfaction, and their links to destination selection. Leisure studies. (1): 65-80.
  9. Conedera M, Del Biaggio A, Seeland K, Moretti M, Home R (2015). Residents’ preferences and use of urban and peri-urban green spaces in a Swiss mountainous region of the Southern Alps. Urban Fores. & Urban Green. (1): 139–147.
  10. Cetinkaya G, Erman A, Uzun MS (2015). Determination of the recreational park users satisfactions and diss