Journals / Eurasian Journal of Forest Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the natural geophyte taxa of Sarıyer (Istanbul) and their use in urban landscape

Pages
79–93
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also most of them are found to be fine textured with 59,18%

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Within approximately 5461 km2area and 16 million population, Istanbul is considered to be the most important andmost crowded city of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition to its unique beauties, it attracts the attention of nature lovers and plantscientists especially with its rich variety of plants which is more than many other countries in the world. 7,2 % of thisfloristic richness is composed of “geophytes”; which are the plants with bulbous, tuberosus, corm or rhizomous rootsystems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also most of them are found to be fine textured with 59,18%
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Within approximately 5461 km2area and 16 million population, Istanbul is considered to be the most important andmost crowded city of Turkey. In addition to its unique beauties, it attracts the attention of nature lovers and plantscientists especially with its rich variety of plants which is more than many other countries in the world. 7,2 % of thisfloristic richness is composed of “geophytes”; which are the plants with bulbous, tuberosus, corm or rhizomous rootsystems. Sarıyer district, which is located in the north side of Istanbul and being an important part of the city'sfloristic richness has been chosen as the study area. The floristic diversity of the district is mostly because of thebiodiversity of natural forest called Belgrad Forest. In this study, investigating the geophytes of the Sarıyer district,one of the greenest districts of Istanbul, evaluating their aesthetic properties and examining the possibilities of theiruse in landscape designs is aimed. For this purpose, plant features and design characteristics, habitats andendangerment categories of Sarıyer geophytes have been studied in detail using various sources. As a result of thisstudy; it is found that there has been 44 native genus and 98 exotic geophyte taxa belonging to 12 families. 27,27 %of the genera are belong to Orchidaceae family and it is followed by Amaryllidaceae family with 18,18 %. Also thegeophytes in the study are mostly having tuberous root type with 38,78%. When the habitats of these taxa has beenevaluated; forest, forest edge areas and shrubs has been found to be the highest rate of 19,85% and 19,73%. Whenwe evaluate the geophyte taxa of Sarıyer in case of their use in landscape designs, their flower colors, floweringperiods and textures has become important. In Sarıyer district mostly white and yellow flowering geophyte taxa hasbeen found with 21,43% and 20,41% ratio. It is also seen that most of the geophyte taxa are flowering in March with23,96% and most of them are 3 months flowering. Also most of them are found to be fine textured with 59,18%

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDENİZ, N. S., YENER, D. (2022). Evaluation of the natural geophyte taxa of Sarıyer (Istanbul) and their use in urban landscape. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 79–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/508434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akdeniz, N.S., Zencirkıran, M. (2016). Bursa Geophytes and Their Usage Possibilities in Landscape Design. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 30, 692-702. Anonymous. (2015-2019). Sarıyer Belediye Başkanlığı 2015-2019
  2. Dönemi Stratejik Planı. Anonymous. (2018). Bulb garden, http://www.chicagobotanic.org/downloads/gardenguides/BulbGuide.pdf
  3. Anonymous. (2019). T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı web site, https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/beykozbbgam/Belgeler/Teknik%20Bilgi/Geofitler.pdf
  4. Avcu, C., Selvi, S., Satıl, F. (2016). Geophytes Plants and Ecological Properties Distributed in Katran Mount (Bayramiç/Çanakkale) and Its Environs. Iğdır University Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 6(3), 9- 16. Ayaşlıgil, Y. (2005). Bitki Kullanımı (Basılmamış Ders Notu). İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü, İstanbul.
  5. Bayraktar, S. (2013). Zekeriyaköy Vadisi Biyotopları Üzerine Araştırmalar, Istanbul University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master Thesis, Istanbul. Bradshaw, A.D, Handley, J. (1982). An ecological approach to landscape design: principles and problems. Landscape Design, 138, 30-34.
  6. Cabi, E. (2016). Tekirdağ İlinde Doğal Olarak Yetişen Soğanlı Bitkiler Üzerine Floristik Araştırmalar. Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Biyoloji Bölümü Botanik Anabilim Dalı NKUBAP0010AR1404 proje raporu, 102s. Çığ, A., Başdoğan, G. (2015). In vitro propagation techniques for some geophyte ornamental plants with high economic value. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, 2(1), 27-49.
  7. Çoban, S., Bayraktar, S., Akgül, M. (2016). Forest Vegetation Maps and its Development in Turkey: A Case from Istanbul-Belgrade Forest. Forest Review, 47(1), 7-16.
  8. Çolak, A.H., Çoban, S., Özalp, G. (2013). Belgrad Ormanı’nın Floristik Analizi ve Yetişme Ortamı Özellikleri, Belgrad Ormanı Bir Doğa ve Kültür Mirası içinde (278-352). T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, 1. Bölge Müdürlüğü-İstanbul.
  9. Tor Ofset San. veTic. Ltd. Şti, Esenyurt İstanbul.
  10. Davis, P.H. (1965-1985). Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Vol:1-9
  11. University Press,
  12. Edinburg. Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., Tan, K. (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement). Volume 10, Univiversity Press., Edinburgh. Dechir, B., Chouikh, A., Hamel, T., Azizi, N.N., Ganaoui, N., Grira, A., Abdiouene, A., Maazi, M.C., Chefrour, A. (2019). Biodiversity of bulbous and tuberous geophytes from the El Kala National Park (North-Eastern Algeria): checklist,