Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire

Pages
238–244
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The internal consistency coefficient was 0.94, andthe correlation between the two halves of the scale was 0.89.Conclusion: The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, which isintended to be used in Turkey upon confirmation of its validity andreliability, is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity andreliability, and it can be reliably used to examine patients’ acceptanceof chronic pain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Pain acceptance is the process of giving up the strugglewith pain and learning to live a worthwhile life despite it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample was composed of 201 patients,more than 10 times the number of items examined for validity andreliability in the study, which totaled 20.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The internal consistency coefficient was 0.94, andthe correlation between the two halves of the scale was 0.89.Conclusion: The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, which isintended to be used in Turkey upon confirmation of its validity andreliability, is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity andreliability, and it can be reliably used to examine patients’ acceptanceof chronic pain.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Pain acceptance is the process of giving up the strugglewith pain and learning to live a worthwhile life despite it. In assessingpatients with chronic pain in Turkey, making a diagnosis and trackingthe effectiveness of treatment is done with scales that have beentranslated into Turkish. However, there is as yet no valid and reliablescale in Turkish to assess the acceptance of pain.Aims: To validate a Turkish version of the Chronic Pain AcceptanceQuestionnaire developed by McCracken and colleagues.Study Design: Methodological and cross sectional study.Methods: A simple randomized sampling method was used inselecting the study sample. The sample was composed of 201 patients,more than 10 times the number of items examined for validity andreliability in the study, which totaled 20. A patient identificationform, the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, and the BriefPain Inventory were used to collect data. Data were collected byface-to-face interviews. In the validity testing, the content validityindex was used to evaluate linguistic equivalence, content validity,construct validity, and expert views. In reliability testing of the scale,Cronbach’s α coefficient was calculated, and item analysis and splittestreliability methods were used. Principal component analysis andvarimax rotation were used in factor analysis and to examine factorstructure for construct concept validity.Results: The item analysis established that the scale, all items, anditem-total correlations were satisfactory. The mean total score of thescale was 21.78. The internal consistency coefficient was 0.94, andthe correlation between the two halves of the scale was 0.89.Conclusion: The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, which isintended to be used in Turkey upon confirmation of its validity andreliability, is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity andreliability, and it can be reliably used to examine patients’ acceptanceof chronic pain.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORHAN, E. A., AKMAZ, H. E., UYAR, M., YILDIRIM, Y. K. (2022). Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 238–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/461063

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Nicholas MK, Asghari A. Investigating acceptance in adjustment to chronic pain: is acceptance broader than we thought? Pain 2006;124:269-79. Özdamar K. Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. 4. Baskı. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi; 2004.
  2. Akın Korhan E, Hakverdioğlu Yönt G, Ak B, Erdemir F. Hemşirelik tanılarını algılama ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Hemşirelik Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2013;15:13-25. Karasar N. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. 9. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım; 1999. Tavşancıl E. Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ileri veri analizi. 4. Basım. Ankara: Nobel Basımevi; 2005.
  3. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma. Hemşirelik Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;5:3-14. Erkuş A. Psikometri üzerine yazılar. 1. Basım. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları; 2003.
  4. MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1999;4:84-99.
  5. Hilde E, Lena L, Øystein Sørebø. The Norwegian versions of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire CPAQ-20 and CPAQ-8-validation and reliability studies. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39:1441-8.
  6. Liu Y, Wang L, Wei Y, Wang X, Xu T, Sun J. Validation of a Chinese version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) and CPAQ-8 in chronic pain patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4339. Mesgarian F, Asghari A, Shaeiri MR, Broumand A. The persian version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. Clin Psychol Psychother 2013;20:350-8.
  7. Cho S, Heiby EM, McCracken LM, Moon DE, Lee JH. Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire in chronic pain patients. Qual Life Res 2012;21:1059-64.
  8. Rodero B, Garcia-Campayo J, Casanueva B, del HOYO YL, Serrano-Blanco A, Luciano JV. Validation of the Spanish version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) for the assessment of acceptance in fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:37. Bernini O, Pennato T, Cosci F, Berrocal C. The psychometric properties of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire in Italian patients with chronic pain. J Health Psychol 2010;15:1236-45.
  9. Gyurcsik NC, Brawley LR, Spink KS, Glazebrook KE, Anderson TJ. Is level of pain acceptance differentially related to social cognitions and behavior? The case of active women with arthritis. J Health Psychol 2011;16:530-9.
  10. Reneman MF, Dijkstra A, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Psychometric properties of Chronic Pain Acceptanc