Journals / Balkan Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with phonological disorder

Pages
127–132
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No left/right ear asymmetry of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression was detected in either of the groups(P > 0.05).Conclusion: Children with phonological disorder did not show alterations in medial olivocochlear functioning in the medial olivocochlear activity as measured by the contralateral suppression of transientevoked otoacoustic emissions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Perception of acoustic details in the speech signal is important for speech sound development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One clinical tool to evaluate the medialolivocochlear activity, which is thought to improve speech perceptionin noise, is the suppression of otoacoustic emissions.Aims: This study investigated the suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with phonological disorder in comparison with that in typically developing controls.Study Design: Case-control study.Methods: A total of 23 children with phonological disorder (aged 5-10years) and 21 age- and sex-matched controls (P > 0.05) participated inthe study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No left/right ear asymmetry of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression was detected in either of the groups(P > 0.05).Conclusion: Children with phonological disorder did not show alterations in medial olivocochlear functioning in the medial olivocochlear activity as measured by the contralateral suppression of transientevoked otoacoustic emissions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Perception of acoustic details in the speech signal is important for speech sound development. The medial olivocochlear pathway, a part of the auditory efferent system, plays a role in stimulus-related control of the cochlea. One clinical tool to evaluate the medialolivocochlear activity, which is thought to improve speech perceptionin noise, is the suppression of otoacoustic emissions.Aims: This study investigated the suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with phonological disorder in comparison with that in typically developing controls.Study Design: Case-control study.Methods: A total of 23 children with phonological disorder (aged 5-10years) and 21 age- and sex-matched controls (P > 0.05) participated inthe study. Participants had pure-tone thresholds ≤ 15 dB hearing lossand normal middle ear functions. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation were measured.Results: Although the mean transient evoked otoacoustic emissionssuppressions were lower in the group with phonological disorderthan in the controls, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No left/right ear asymmetry of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression was detected in either of the groups(P > 0.05).Conclusion: Children with phonological disorder did not show alterations in medial olivocochlear functioning in the medial olivocochlear activity as measured by the contralateral suppression of transientevoked otoacoustic emissions.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, E., TAŞ, M., YILMAZ, Ş. (2022). Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with phonological disorder. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 127–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/460787

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Shriberg LD. Diagnostic markers for child speech-sound disorders: introductory comments. Clin Linguist Phon. 2003
  2. 17(7):501-505. [Crossref] 2. de Freitas CR, Mezzomo CL, Vidor DCGM. Phonemic discrimination and the relationship with other linguistic levels in children with typical phonological development and phonological disorder. Codas. 2015
  3. 27(3):236-241. [Crossref] 3. Mellon NK. Language and speech acquisition. In: Niparko JK, editor. Cochlear implants: principles & practices. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  4. p.245-262. 4. Hedge MN, Pomaville F. Assessment of communication disorders in children: resources and protocols. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing
  5. Preston JL, Irwin JR, Turcios J. Perception of speech sounds in school-age children with speech sound disorders. Semin Speech Lang. 2015
  6. 36(4):224-233. [Crossref] 6. Mattsson TS, Lind O, Follestad T, Grøndahl K, Wayne W, Nordgard S. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in a clinical sample of children with auditory processing disorder. Int J Audiol. 2019
  7. 58(5):301-310. [Crossref] 7. Smith DW, Keil A. The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015
  8. [Crossref] 8. Velenovsky DS, Glattke TJ. Suppression of otoacoustic emissions in populations with normal hearing sensitivity. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, editors. Otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications. New York, Thieme Medical Publishers
  9. Guinan Jr JJ. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear. 2006:27(6):589-607. [Crossref] 10. Giraud AL, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Lina G, Chays A, Chery-Croze S. Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility. Neuroreport. 1997
  10. 8(7):1779-1183. [Crossref] 11. Kumar U, Vanaja CS. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear. 2004
  11. 25(2):142-146. [Crossref] 12. Mertes IB, Wilbanks EC, Leek MR. Olivocochlear efferent activity is associated with the slope of the psychometric function of speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2018
  12. 39(3):583-593. [Crossref] 13. Wagner W, Frey K, Heppelmann G, Plontke SK, Zenner HP. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008
  13. 128(1): 53-60. [Crossref] 14. Stuart A, Butler AK. Contralateral suppression of transi