Journals / Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Anatomical, Palynological and Micromorphological Investigations of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. ve Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. caucasica Rousi (Elaeagnaceae) Taxa

Elaeagnus angustifolia L. ve Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. caucasica Rousi (Elaeagnaceae) Taksonlarının Anatomik, Palinolojik ve Mikromorfolojik Yönden İncelenmesi

Pages
70–81
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been observed that the trichomes of E. angustifolia and H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica are of the peltate, stellatepeltate type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Elaeagnus angustifolia L. is a naturalized Eurasian tree found along waterways in many arid and semi-arid parts of the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hippophae rhamnoides (L.) A.Nelson is a flowering shrub with wide distribution in cold temperate regions of Asia and Europe.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been observed that the trichomes of E. angustifolia and H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica are of the peltate, stellatepeltate type.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: Elaeagnus angustifolia L. is a naturalized Eurasian tree found along waterways in many arid and semi-arid parts of the world. Hippophae rhamnoides (L.) A.Nelson is a flowering shrub with wide distribution in cold temperate regions of Asia and Europe. This study was carried out in order to contribute to the taxonomy of the genera by examining the anatomical, palynological and trichome micromorphological features of E. angustifolia and H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica taxa in the family Elaeagnaceae. Within the scope of anatomical studies of taxa, root, stem and leaf cross sections were taken and dyed with safranin fast-green method. When the anatomical features of taxa were examined, it was determined that they had the characteristic features of a dicotyledon plant with a secondary structure. It was determined that E. angustifolia leaves were bifacial and H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica leaves were ecvifacial. Pollens of E. angustifolia are suboblate, ornamentation psilat-verrucate. The pollen shape of H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica is prolate-spheroidal, ornamentation verrucate-rugulate. It has been observed that the trichomes of E. angustifolia and H. rhamnoides subsp. caucasica are of the peltate, stellatepeltate type.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATASAGUN, B. (2022). The Anatomical, Palynological and Micromorphological Investigations of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. ve Hippophae rhamnoides L. subsp. caucasica Rousi (Elaeagnaceae) Taxa. Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 70–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/458847

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbolat, D., Ertekin C., Mengeş H.O., Güzel E. ve Ekinci K. (2008). Physical and nutritional properties of Oleaster (Eleagnus angustifolia L.) growing in Turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry 20: 2358-2366.
  2. Amiri Tehranizadeh, Z., Baratian A. ve Hosseinzadeh H. (2016). Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) as a herbal healer. Bioimpacts 6: 155-167.
  3. Aras- Tayhan, A. (1995). Türkiye’nin Hippophae rhamnoides L. ssp. caucasica Rousi Polenleri. Ulusal Palinoloji Kongresi. Aralık 1995. İ.Ü. Orman Fak. Say. 84-92.
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Arohonka, T. ve Rousi A. (1980). Karyotypes and C-bands in Shepherdia and Elaeagnus. Annales Botanici Fennici 17: 258-263.
  6. Chen, C.Y., Chen C., Yeh H., Li H. ve Huang G. (2019). Secondary Metabolites from the Leaves of Elaeagnus glabra. Chemistry of Natural Compounds 55(4): 724-725.
  7. Deniz, Z. (2008). Kastamonu Çevresi Yalancı İğde (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Populasyonları Üzerinde Karpolojik Araştırmalar. İ.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, YL. Tezi, İstanbul, 90 s. Ehleringer, J.R. ve Mooney, H.A. (1978). Leaf hairs: effects on physiological activity and adaptive value to a desert shrub. Oecologia 37: 183–200.
  8. Erdtman, G. (1969). Handbook of Palynology. Morphology-Taxonomy-Ecology. An Introduction to the Study of Pollen Grains and Spores. Hafner Publishing Co, Copenhagen. Faegri, K. ve Iversen, J. (1989). Textbook of Pollen Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. Gao, R., Hou J., Zhao R., Yang X., Hou X., Huo L., Hidayati S.N. ve Walck J.L. (2021). Seed dormancy and germination of a critically endangered plant, Elaeagnus mollis, on the Loess Plateau of China. European Journal of Forest Research 140(2): 451-461.
  9. Güner, A., Aslan S., Ekim T., Vural M. ve Babaç M. 2012. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi yayınları, İstanbul.
  10. Halbritter, H. ve Heigl, H. (2020). Elaeagnus angustifolia. Şu eserde: PalDat - A palynological database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Elaeagnus_angustifolia/304216, (erişim tarihi: 07.04.2021).
  11. Halbritter, H., Heigl, H., Svojtka, M. 2020. Hippophae rhamnoides. Şu eserde: PalDat - A palynological database. https://www.paldat.org/pub/Hippophae_rhamnoides/304215, (Erişim tarihi: 07.04.2021).
  12. Hays, J.F.Jr. (1990). Wildlife considerations in windbreak renovation. Şu eserde: Great Plains Agricultural Council, compiler. Windbreaks: Living with the wind: Proceedings, windbreak renovation workshop; 1990 October 23- 25. Hesse, M., Halbrotter, H., Zetter, R., Weber, M., Buchner, R., Frosch-Radovo, A