SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Morphological And Some Ecological Chaceristics Of Eryngium ilex P. H. Davis (Apiaceae)

Eryngium ilex P. H. Davis (Apiaceae) Türünün Morfolojik Ve Bazı Ekolojik Özellikleri

İdris SARI
Ali KANDEMİR
Pages
82–96
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that soil properties of the species’ habitat were slightly alkaline, non-saline, clayey-loamy in structure, having less humus as organic matter, and chalky or non-chalky.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Genus Eryngium L. is the biggest genera of Apiaceae, which is one of the most well-known families of flowering plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Davis is one of the most spectacular species of the genus, represented by 27 taxa in Turkey, and its distribution is limited to the Munzur Mountains in the World.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that soil properties of the species’ habitat were slightly alkaline, non-saline, clayey-loamy in structure, having less humus as organic matter, and chalky or non-chalky.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: Genus Eryngium L. is the biggest genera of Apiaceae, which is one of the most well-known families of flowering plants. Eryngium ilex P. H. Davis is one of the most spectacular species of the genus, represented by 27 taxa in Turkey, and its distribution is limited to the Munzur Mountains in the World. No research has been found except its introduction to the world of science and distribution modeling of the species. In this study, detailed morphological and some abiotic and biotic ecological features of the species were investigated. Climatic characteristics preferred by the species were determined by using bioclimatic variables and records of the species’ individuals. To determine insect visitors of the species and threats to the species’ habitats, we observed by visiting two populations of the species seven times between June and September in 2013. Morphological findings obtained from 10 individuals of the species were compared with the findings of P. H. Davis’ research. Compared with the original description of the species, it was determined that the species contains more variations than the specified morphological characters. It was found that soil properties of the species’ habitat were slightly alkaline, non-saline, clayey-loamy in structure, having less humus as organic matter, and chalky or non-chalky. It has been revealed that the distribution of the species highly related to the topographic structure of the habitats, according to results obtained from field observations. It has also been revealed that the species prefers harsh climatic conditions, and some visitors of the species may be harmful to it. In conclusion, the species has been re-described, and some suggestions regarding its conservation have been made.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, İ., KANDEMİR, A. (2022). Morphological And Some Ecological Chaceristics Of Eryngium ilex P. H. Davis (Apiaceae). Bağbahçe Bilim Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 82–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/458841

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akçakaya, H.R., Burgman, M.A. ve Ginzburg, L. R. (1999). Applied Population Ecology: Principles and Computer Exercises Using RAMAS EcoLab 2.0, MA[: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. Calviño, C. I. ve Downie, S. R. (2007). Circumscription and phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Saniculoideae based on chloroplast DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(1): 175-191. Calviño, C.I., Martínez, S.G. ve Downie, S.R. (2010). Unraveling the taxonomic complexity of Eryngium L. (Apiaceae, Saniculoideae): Phylogenetic analysis of 11 non-coding cpDNA loci corroborates rapid radiations. Plant Div. Evol. 128(1–2):137–149.
  2. Davis, P.H. (1972). Eryngium L. Şu eserde: Davis, P.H. (1972). Flora of Turkey And The East Aegean Islands 4: 292 304. Edinburgh University Press,
  3. Edinburgh. Demiralay, İ. (1993). Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
  4. Erzurum. Dudareva, N. A. ve Pichersky, E. (2006). Biology of Floral Scent. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group. USA. Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Vural, M., Duman, H., Aytaç, Z. ve Adıgüzel, N. (2000). Türkiye Bitkileri Kırmızı Kitabı. Türkiye Tabiatı Koruma Derneği ve Van 100. Yıl Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  5. Ankara.
  6. Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W. ve Willoughby, J. W.(1998). Measuring and monitoring plant populations. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Colorado. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). (2019). ArcGis Release 10.5.1 Redlands, CA. Frankham, R., Briscoe, D.A. ve Ballou, J.D. (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Cambridge, UK. Fick, S. E. ve Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37 (12): 4302-4315.
  8. Gee, G.W. ve Bauder, J.W. (1986). Partical-Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. SSSA Book Series. Agron. Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M. ve Babaç, M. T. (2012). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi. Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul.
  9. Güner, A. ve Ekim, T. (edlr.), (2014). Resimli Türkiye Florası 1. NGBB Yayınları Flora Dizisi 2, Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları yayını, İstanbul.
  10. Heywood, V.H., Brummit, R.K., Culham, A. ve Seberg, O. (2007). Flowering Plant Families Of The World. Firefly Books, New York. Ingrouille, M. ve Eddie, B. (2006). Plants: Evolution and Diversity. Cambridge University P