Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17

Some Quality and Antioxidant Properties of Important Foreigner Apple Cultivars Consumed in Afyonkarahisar

Afyonkarahisar’da Tüketilen Önemli Yabancı Elma Çeşitlerinin Bazı Kalite ve Antioksidan Özellikleri

Pages
927–932
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The color data (L, a and b) in flesh of apple samples were changed 78.21 (Red Delicious) – 84.17 (Golden Delicious), (–0.40) (Breaburn) – (–1.28) (Cameo) and 22.78 (Fuji) – 26.08 (Golden Delicious), respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, economically important five different foreigner apple cultivars ((Golden Delicious, Cameo, Fuji, Red Delicious, Breaburn) consumed in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey were evaluated for their quality and antioksidant properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The water activity, brix values %, pH data, and total antioksidant (radical scavenging -DPHH) capacity of the apple samples were changed 0.946 (Red Delicious/ Breaburn ) – 0.955 (Cameo), % 12.36 (Cameo/Fuji) – 14.04 (Red Delicous), pH 4.22 (Golden Delicious) – 4.92 (Cameo), and 4,46 ile (Fuji ) – %17,24 (Red delicious), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The color data (L, a and b) in flesh of apple samples were changed 78.21 (Red Delicious) – 84.17 (Golden Delicious), (–0.40) (Breaburn) – (–1.28) (Cameo) and 22.78 (Fuji) – 26.08 (Golden Delicious), respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, economically important five different foreigner apple cultivars ((Golden Delicious, Cameo, Fuji, Red Delicious, Breaburn) consumed in Afyonkarahisar-Turkey were evaluated for their quality and antioksidant properties. The water activity, brix values %, pH data, and total antioksidant (radical scavenging -DPHH) capacity of the apple samples were changed 0.946 (Red Delicious/ Breaburn ) – 0.955 (Cameo), % 12.36 (Cameo/Fuji) – 14.04 (Red Delicous), pH 4.22 (Golden Delicious) – 4.92 (Cameo), and 4,46 ile (Fuji ) – %17,24 (Red delicious), respectively. Also, the changes of color data (L, a and b) in peel of apple samples were determined 33.00 (Red Delicious) – 73.05 (Golden Delicious), (–3.8) (Golden Delicious) - 32.24 (Breaburn) and 10.25 (Red Delicious) – 44.79 (Golden Delicious), respectively. The color data (L, a and b) in flesh of apple samples were changed 78.21 (Red Delicious) – 84.17 (Golden Delicious), (–0.40) (Breaburn) – (–1.28) (Cameo) and 22.78 (Fuji) – 26.08 (Golden Delicious), respectively.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Afyonkarahisar (Türkiye) il merkezinde tüketime sunulan ekonomik olarak önemli 5 farklı yabancı çeşit elma (GoldenDelicious, Cameo, Fuji, Red Delicious, Breaburn) bazı kalite (su aktivitesi, briks, pH ve renk) özellikleri ve antioksidan kapasitesi(Radikal süpürücü – DPHH) açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Elma örneklerine ait bazı kalite özellikleri ve toplam antioksidan kapasitesideğerlerinin değişimi sırası ile su aktivitesi 0.946 (Red Delicious/ Breaburn ) – 0.955 (Cameo); briks % 12.36 (Cameo/Fuji) – 14.04(Red Delicious), pH 4.22 (Golden Delicious) – 4.92 (Cameo), ve % DPPH (radikal süpürme aktivitesi yöntemi) %4,46 ile (Fuji ) –%17.24 (Red delicious) olarak tesbit edilmiştir. Ayrıca elma örneklerinin kabuklarına ait renk analizi ile L, a ve b değerleri değişimisırasıyla 33.00 (Red Delicious) – 73.05 (Golden Delicious), (–3.8) (Golden Delicious) ile 32.24 (Breaburn) ve 10.25 (Red Delicious)– 44.79 (Golden Delicious) olarak bulunmuştur. Elma örneklerinin etindeki renk değerleri L, a ve b sırasıyla 78.21 (Red Delicious) –84.17 (Golden Delicious), (–0.40) (Breaburn) ile (–1.28) (Cameo) ve 22.78 (Fuji) – 26.02 (Golden Delicious) olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KASNAK, C., PALAMUTOĞLU, R., BAYDIR, A. T., DIRAMAN, H. (2022). Some Quality and Antioxidant Properties of Important Foreigner Apple Cultivars Consumed in Afyonkarahisar. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17, 927–932. https://ajindex.com/articles/458096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Balta M.F., Kaya T., Kırkaya H., & Karakaya O. (2015). Kumru (Ordu) Yöresinde Yetiştirilen Mahalli Elma Genotiplerinin Fenolojik, Morfolojik ve Pomolojik Özellikleri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi.32 (1): 47 -56 Bostan, S.Z., & Acar, Ş. (2009). Ünye (Ordu) çevresinde yetiştirilen mahalli elma çeşitlerinin pomolojik özellikleri. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2: 15-24.
  2. Boyer, J. & Liu, R. H. (2004). Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutrition Journal, 15, 1–15.
  3. Cemeroğlu B. (2004). Meyve Sebze İşleme Teknolojisi 2. 2. Baskı.
  4. Ankara,
  5. Türkiye, Bizim Grup Basımevi. Choi, S.-H., Kozukue, N., Kim, H.-J., & Friedman, M. (2016). Analysis of protein amino acids, non-protein amino acids and metabolites, dietary protein, glucose, fructose, sucrose, phenolic, and flavonoid content and antioxidative properties of potato tubers, peels, and cortexes (pulps). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 50, 77–87.
  6. Chai S.C., Hooshmand, S., Saadat R.L.,Payton,M.E., Brummel - Smith,K., Arjmandi B.H. (2012). Daily Apple versus Dried Plum: Impact on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women. Journal of the Academy of Nutrıtıon and Dıetetıcs, 112(8), 1158–1168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.05.005
  7. Chong C.H, Law, C.L., Figiel, A., Wojdyło, A.,& Oziembłowski M. (2013). Colour, phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of some fruits dehydrated by a combination of different methods. Food Chemistry 141: 3889–3896
  8. Ertekin Filiz, B.(2015). Elma cipsinin bazı kalite ve antioksidan özelliklerine kurutma ambalajlama ve depolamanın etkisi. (Doktora Tezi, Basılmamış). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Gıda Mühendisliği ABD.176 sayfa. Isparta Filiz, B. E., & Seydim, A. C. (2014). Bazı Kurutulmuş Meyvelerin Antioksidan Özellikleri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2(3), 128–131. FAO, (2018). Statistics Division of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC( erişim tarihi: 18 /08/2019)
  9. Fu, L., Xu, B.T., Xu, X.R., Gan, R.Y., Zhang, Y., Xia, E.Q.,& Li H.B., 2011. Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of 62 fruits. Food Chem., 129: 345-350 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.079
  10. İçli, N. (2017). Elma Ekşilerinde Toplam Fenolik Bileşikler, Toplam Antioksidan Kapasite Ve Toplam Flavonoid Maddelerin Tespiti. Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu, 2(2), 89–99.
  11. Karadeniz, F., Burdurlu, H.S., Koca, N., & Soyer, Y. (2005). Antioxidant Activity o