Journals / Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19

Analysis of Behaviors and Attitudes of Bread Consumption in Turkey: Case of the Province of Adana

Türkiye’deki Ekmek Tüketicilerinin Davranış ve Tutumları: Adana İli Örneği

Pages
659–667
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In a context wherebread represents a basic foodstuff for a large part of the population, it is therefore important to develop policies so that bread isaccessible to all.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study was to analyze the behavior and attitudes of bread consumers in Turkey in the province of Adana.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thesurveys were carried out in a simple random fashion among 100 households in the city center of Adana province according to socialclass.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In a context wherebread represents a basic foodstuff for a large part of the population, it is therefore important to develop policies so that bread isaccessible to all.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the behavior and attitudes of bread consumers in Turkey in the province of Adana. Thesurveys were carried out in a simple random fashion among 100 households in the city center of Adana province according to socialclass. Analysis of the data collected shows that the behavior and attitudes of bread consumers in the province of Adana have changedover time not only in terms of quantity, types of bread and places of purchase. This change in behavior and attitudes is influenced bysocio-economic and demographic characteristics such as education, occupation, household size, social class and monthly income ofconsumers. The increase in the unit selling price of bread significantly influences consumer behavior and attitudes. In a context wherebread represents a basic foodstuff for a large part of the population, it is therefore important to develop policies so that bread isaccessible to all.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Adana ilinde ekmek tüketicilerinin davranış ve tutumlarını incelemektir. Araştırmanın anketleri sosyal sınıflara göre basit rastgele bir şekilde seçilen Adana il merkezindeki 100 hanede 2020 yılında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları; Adana ilinde son yıllarda tüketicilerin ekmek tüketim miktarları, tükettikleri ekmek çeşitleri ile ekmek satın alma yerleri açısından önemli değişim gösterdiği, bu değişimde; tüketicilerin eğitim düzeyi, mesleği, hane halkı büyüklüğü ve aylık gelirinin etkili olduğu, tüketiclerin tam buğday ekmek çeşidine daha yüksek fiyat ödemeye istekli olduğu ortaya konmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, Ş., KESKİN, F., ÜNAL, H., MIASSI, Y. (2022). Analysis of Behaviors and Attitudes of Bread Consumption in Turkey: Case of the Province of Adana. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 19, 659–667. https://ajindex.com/articles/457471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AAC. (2014). Le consommateur japonais: Comportements, dispositions et perceptions à l’égard des produits alimentaires AgriRéseau. https://www.agrireseau.net/documents/80371/le-consommateur-japonais-comportements-dispositions-et-perceptions-al_egard-des-produits-alimentaires Anonymous, (2016). AIBI Bread Market Report 2013, January. http://www.aibi.eu/wp- content/uploads/draft-AIBI-BreadMarket-report-2013.pdf. Aksoylu, Z., Savlak, N. Y., Yangic Ç., Cagindi, O., & Kose, E. (2004). Manisa il merkezinde bireylerin ekmek çeşitlerini tüketim alişkanliklarinin belirlenmesi. GIDA, 39(3), 147‑154. Banque Française. (2020, janvier 17). La mesure du pouvoir d’achat. Banque de France. https://abc-economie.banque-france.fr/lamesure-du-pouvoir-dachat
  2. Baysal, A. (2011). Beslenme. Yenilenmiş 13. Baskı.
  3. Hatiboğlu Yayınevi,
  4. Ankara.
  5. Bouteldja, A. (2014). Analyse du secteur boulangerie-pâtisserie-viennoiseries. 48. Curtet, R. (1998). Pain blanc, pain complet: Fabrication et intérêt diététique. 137. Delgado, L. (1999). 20. Transfert du modèle de consommation alimentaire occidental ou innovation ? In J.-P. Chauveau, M.-C. Cormier Salem, & É. Mollard (Éds.), L’innovation en agriculture (p. 343‑359). IRD Éditions. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.15807
  6. Dogan, I.S., 2003. Tahıl İşleme Teknolojisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Gıda Mühendisliği Bölümü Ders Notu, Van. Dubois-Brissonnet, F., & Guillier, L. (2020). Les maladies microbiennes d’origine alimentaire. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique, 55(1), 30‑38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnd.2019.12.001
  7. Erturk, A., & Arslanta, N. (2015). Isparta İli Kentsel Alanda Ailelerin Ekmek Tüketimi ve İsrafı. Akademik Gıda, 13(4), 9. FAOSTAT.(2020). Quantité de production de blé par pays (Exemple de la Turquie). http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QC/visualize
  8. Guine, R., Matos, M., Henriques, C. and Correia, P. (2016). Preferences and Consumer Habits Related to Bread in the Centre of Portugal. Nutrition & Food Science, 46(3): 306-320.
  9. Koten, M., Unsal, A.S., 2006. Şanlıurfa yöresine özgü tırnaklı ve açık ekmeklerin bazı kimyasal bileşimlerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10(3/4): 57-62.
  10. Lang, T. (2004). Prévention des maladies cardio-vasculaires: Multifactorielle et multisectorielle ? ASDP, n°47, 51‑55. Marty, P., Manceron, S., Le Mouel, C., & Schmitt,B. (2015). Le système agricole et alimentaire de la région Afrique du Nord– Moyen-Orient: une analyse rétrospectiv