SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Voice Behavior in the Relationship Between Proactive Personality and Job Performance

Süleyman Cem BOZDOĞAN
Pages
1069–1085
Publication Date
2021-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it has been found that proactive personality has a positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior and in this relationship employee voice behavior has a mediating role.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior on the impact of proactive personality on job performance as well as the mediating impact of employee voice behavior on the effect of proactive personality on organizational citizenship behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The statistical population of this study included 447 private hospital employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it has been found that proactive personality has a positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior and in this relationship employee voice behavior has a mediating role.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Proactive Personality · Organizational Citizenship Behavior · Voice Behavior

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior on the impact of proactive personality on job performance as well as the mediating impact of employee voice behavior on the effect of proactive personality on organizational citizenship behavior. The statistical population of this study included 447 private hospital employees. Data was analyzed by structural equation method using SPSS AMOS program. The mediation functions were calculated using a process macro. As a result of the study, it was discovered that proactive personality has a positive effect on job performance, with organizational citizenship actions acting as a mediating factor. In addition, it has been found that proactive personality has a positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior and in this relationship employee voice behavior has a mediating role.

Özet

This study aims to evaluate the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior on the impact of proactive personality on job performance as well as the mediating impact of employee voice behavior on the effect of proactive personality on organizational citizenship behavior. The statistical population of this study included 447 private hospital employees. Data was analyzed by structural equation method using SPSS AMOS program. The mediation functions were calculated using a process macro. As a result of the study, it was discovered that proactive personality has a positive effect on job performance, with organizational citizenship actions acting as a mediating factor. In addition, it has been found that proactive personality has a positive effect on organizational citizenship behavior and in this relationship employee voice behavior has a mediating role.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZDOĞAN, S. C. (2021). The Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Voice Behavior in the Relationship Between Proactive Personality and Job Performance. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 1069–1085. https://ajindex.com/articles/457078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2000). Employee development through self‐development in three retail banks. Personnel Review. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of occupational psychology, 58(1), 67-79.
  2. Baba, V. V., Tourigny, L., Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2009). Proactive personality and work performance in China: The moderating effects of emotional exhaustion and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 26(1), 23-37.
  3. Bandura, A. (1973). Social Leaming Theory of Aggression. The Control of Aggression. Chicago: Adline. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
  4. Chow, I. H.-S. (2009). The relationship between social capital, organizational citizenship behavior, and performance outcomes: an empirical study from China. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 74(3), 44. Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of applied psychology, 80(4), 532. Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of small business management, 34, 42-49.
  5. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462.
  6. De Boer, B. J., Van Hooft, E. A., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Self-control at work: its relationship with contextual performance. Journal of managerial psychology. Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 93-108.
  7. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., Lawrence, K. A., & Miner-Rubino, K. (2002). Red light, green light: Making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organization Science, 13(4), 355-369.
  8. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management journal, 39(1), 37-63.
  9. Fuller Jr, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 329-345.
  10. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales perform