SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Financial Efficiency Measurement in Airlines and Determining Factors of Efficiency

Veysi ASKER
Nurhan AYDIN
Pages
793–814
Publication Date
2021-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, airlines obtaining low-cost business model are more efficient than airlines obtaining traditional business model in terms of financial.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to compare airlines by carrying out measurement of efficiency of them obtaining different business models in terms of financial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this regard, airlines are separated into two groups, namely, traditional and low-cost airlines based on their business models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, airlines obtaining low-cost business model are more efficient than airlines obtaining traditional business model in terms of financial.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Efficiency · Data Envelopment Analysis · Tobit regression model

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare airlines by carrying out measurement of efficiency of them obtaining different business models in terms of financial. The other aim is to reveal variables which have influence on score of efficiency. With this regard, airlines are separated into two groups, namely, traditional and low-cost airlines based on their business models. While the measurement of traditional and low-cost airlines efficiency was carried out with Data Envelopment Analysis, factors affecting efficiency scores of airlines were determined by Tobit regression model. According to the results of the study, airlines obtaining low-cost business model are more efficient than airlines obtaining traditional business model in terms of financial. Moreover, large-scale traditional airlines are more efficient than medium-scale traditional airlines. In terms of Tobit regression model, there are different results for two groups.

Özet

The aim of the study is to compare airlines by carrying out measurement of efficiency of them obtaining different business models in terms of financial. The other aim is to reveal variables which have influence on score of efficiency. With this regard, airlines are separated into two groups, namely, traditional and low-cost airlines based on their business models. While the measurement of traditional and low-cost airlines efficiency was carried out with Data Envelopment Analysis, factors affecting efficiency scores of airlines were determined by Tobit regression model. According to the results of the study, airlines obtaining low-cost business model are more efficient than airlines obtaining traditional business model in terms of financial. Moreover, large-scale traditional airlines are more efficient than medium-scale traditional airlines. In terms of Tobit regression model, there are different results for two groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASKER, V., AYDIN, N. (2021). Financial Efficiency Measurement in Airlines and Determining Factors of Efficiency. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 793–814. https://ajindex.com/articles/457049

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADLER, N., FRIEDMAN, L. and SINUANY-STERN, Z. (2002). "Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context", European Journal of Operational Research, 140: 249-265.
  2. AKAN, Y. and ÇALMAŞUR, G. (2011). "Etkinliğin Hesaplanmasında Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Stokastik Sınır Yaklaşımı Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması", Atatürk Üniveristesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25: 13-32.
  3. BAKIR, M., AKAN, Ş., KIRACI, K., KARABASEVIC, D., STANUJKIC, D. and POPOVIC, G. (2020). "Multıple- Crıteria Approach Of The Operational Perfomance Evaluation İn The Airline Industry: Evidence From Emerging Market", Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 23(2): 149-172.
  4. BARBOT, C., COSTA, A. and SOCHIRCA, E. (2008). "Airlines Performance in the New Market Context: A Comparative Productivity", Journal of Air Transport Management, 14 (5): 270-274.
  5. BHADRA, D. (2009). "Race to The Bottom or Swimming Upstream: Performance Analysis of US Airlines", Journal of Air Transport Management, 15(5): 227-235.
  6. CHANG, Y.-T., PARK, H.-s., JEONG, J.-B. and LEE, J.-w. (2014). "Evaluating Economic And Environmental Efficiency Of Global", Transportation Research Part D, 27(1): 46-50.
  7. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W. W. and RHODES, E. L. (1978). "Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444.
  8. CHIOU, Y. C. and CHEN, Y. H. (2006). "Route-Based Performance Evaluation of Taiwanese Domestic Airlines Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(2): 116-127.
  9. COOK, W. D. and ZHU, J. (2005). Modeling Performance Measurment Application and Implementation Issues in DEA, Springer, New York. COOPER, W., SEIFORD, L. and TONE, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis a Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications References and Dea- Solver Software, Springer, Newyork. ELSAYED, A. and KHALIL, N. S. (2017). "Evaluate and Analysis Efficiency of Safaga Port Using DEA-CCR, BCC and SBM Models–Comparison with DP World Sokhna", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(4): 1-11.
  10. GOOD, D. H., RÖLLER, L.-H. and SICKLES, R. C. (1995). "Airline Efficiency Differences Between Europe and the US: Implications For The Pace of EC İntegration And Domestic Regulation", European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3): 508-518.
  11. GREENE, W. H. (2003).
  12. Econometrıc Analysıs, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. GUJARATI, D. N. and PORTER, D. C. (2012). Temel Ekonometri. (Ü. Şenesen. ve G. Şenesen, Çev.), Literatür