Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

A Study on CO₂ Emissions in MINT Countries: Panel Cointegration and DOLSMG Analysis

MINT Ülkelerinde CO₂ Emisyonu Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Panel Eşbütünleşme ve DOLSMG Analizi

Pages
2869–2884
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the DOLSMG estimator used to determine the long-term coefficients, has been determined that the increases in per capita GDP and per capita energy consumption increase the CO₂ emissions in the relevant country group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to examine the cointegration relations between GDP per capita, trade openness ratio, per capita energy consumption and CO₂ emissions in the 1980-2020 period of MINT countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results of the DOLSMG estimator used to determine the long-term coefficients, has been determined that the increases in per capita GDP and per capita energy consumption increase the CO₂ emissions in the relevant country group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that it is necessary to increase the efficiency level of energy use, to support foreign trade policies to reduce the amount of emissions, and to reduce the technologies that use high carbon in economic growth targets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:CO2 Emisyonu · Kişi Başına Gelir · Enerji

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to examine the cointegration relations between GDP per capita, trade openness ratio, per capita energy consumption and CO₂ emissions in the 1980-2020 period of MINT countries. The findings showed that the variables in question have a structure that moves together in the long run. According to the results of the DOLSMG estimator used to determine the long-term coefficients, has been determined that the increases in per capita GDP and per capita energy consumption increase the CO₂ emissions in the relevant country group. In addition, it was determined that the variable with the greatest effect on the increase in emission amount was energy consumption. In this context, it is noteworthy that the energy consumption per capita in Mexico and Turkey is above the group average. However, if the level of trade openness increases, it has been found that the emission level decreases, even though it has a low effect coefficient. The findings indicate that it is necessary to increase the efficiency level of energy use, to support foreign trade policies to reduce the amount of emissions, and to reduce the technologies that use high carbon in economic growth targets.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, MINT ülkelerinin 1980-2020 sürecindeki kişi başına GSYİH, ticari dışa açıklık oranı ve kişi başına enerji tüketimi ile CO₂ emisyon düzeyi arasındaki eşbütünleşme ilişkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgular, söz konusu değişkenlerin uzun dönemde birlikte hareket eden bir yapıda olduğunu göstermiştir. Uzun dönem katsayılarının tespiti amacıyla yararlanılan DOLSMG tahmincisine ait sonuçlara göre, kişi başına GSYİH ve kişi başına enerji tüketiminde meydana gelen artışların ilgili ülke grubundaki CO₂ emisyonunu arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca emisyon miktarı artışı üzerindeki etkisi en fazla olan değişkenin enerji tüketimi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, özellikle Meksika ve Türkiye’deki kişi başına enerji tüketiminin grup ortalamasının üzerinde seyretmesi dikkat çekmektedir. Bununla birlikte ticari dışa açıklık düzeyinin artması halinde düşük bir etki katsayısına sahip olunsa da emisyon düzeyinin azaldığı bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, özellikle enerji kullanımına ilişkin verimlilik düzeyinin arttırılması, emisyon miktarının azaltılmasına yönelik dış ticaret politikalarının desteklenmesi ve ekonomik büyüme hedeflerinde yüksek karbon kullanan teknolojilerin azaltılması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYLA, D. (2022). A Study on CO₂ Emissions in MINT Countries: Panel Cointegration and DOLSMG Analysis. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 2869–2884. https://ajindex.com/articles/456935

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADEBAYO, T. S., RJOUB, H., AKADIRI, S. S., OLADIPUPO, S. D., SHARIF, A., & ADESHOLA, I. (2022). “The Role of Economic Complexity in The Environmental Kuznets Curve of MINT Economies: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16): 24248-24260.
  2. AL-MULALI, U., TANG, C. F., & OZTURK, I. (2015). “Estimating The Environment Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: Evidence from Latin America and The Caribbean Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50: 918–924.
  3. ANTWEILER, W., COPELAND, B.R., & TAYLOR, M.S. (2001). ‘‘Is Free Trade Good for The Environment?’’, The American Economic Review. 91(4): 877-908.
  4. APERGIS, N., & PAYNE, E. (2009). “CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage and Output in Central America”, Energy Policy, 37: 3282–3286.
  5. APERGIS, N., & PAYNE, J. E. (2010). “The Emissions, Energy Consumption and Growth Nexus: Evidence from The Common Wealth of Independent States”, Energy Policy, 38(1): 650-655.
  6. ASTERIOU, D., & HALL, S.G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit Revisited Edition,
  7. Palgra ve Macmillan, Newyork. AYDIN, F. F. (2013). “CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy Consumption, Population Density and Economic Growth in G7 Countries”, The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Management, 2(8): 89-104.
  8. AYE, G. C., & EDOJA, P. E. (2017). “Effect of Economic Growth on CO2 Emission in Developing Countries: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model”, Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(2017): 1-22.
  9. BREUSCH, T., & PAGAN, A. (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239 253. DUROTOYE, A. (2014). “The MINT Countries as Emerging Economic Power Bloc: Prospect and Challenges”, Developing Country Studies, 4(15): 99-106.
  10. GROSSMAN, G. M., & KRUEGER, A. B. (1991). “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, Natİonal Bureau Of Economıc Research, 3914: 1- 39. HARBAUGH, W. T., LEVINSON, A., & WILSON, D. M. (2002). “Reexamining The Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3): 541-551.
  11. HEIDARI, H., KATIRCIOĞLU, T., & SAEIDPOUR, L. (2015). “Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption in The Five ASEAN Countries”, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64: 785–791.
  12. HETTIGE, H., MANI, M., & WHEELER, D. (2000). “Industrial Pollution in Economic Development: The Environmental Kuznets Curve Revisited”, Journal of