Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2013 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of Ohmic Cooking Effectiveness of Meatballs Cooked to Different Final Temperatures

Köfte Örneklerinin Farklı Son Sıcaklıklara Ohmik Yöntemle Pişirme Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi

Pages
27–33
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were significant differences in the a*, ∆C, Hue and chroma values of center of the samples P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ohmic cooking were applied to meatball samples by using different central temperatures 70, 75 and 80°C at 15.26 V/cm voltage gradient, and the effects of the system on the microbial load, color, cooking yield and C/PU value of the samples were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine the effects of ohmic cooking on pathogenic bacteria, meatballs were inoculated with Salmonella enteridis at a 3 log CFU/g level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were significant differences in the a*, ∆C, Hue and chroma values of center of the samples P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ohmik · Pişirme · Mikrobiyoloji

Abstract

Ohmic cooking were applied to meatball samples by using different central temperatures 70, 75 and 80°C at 15.26 V/cm voltage gradient, and the effects of the system on the microbial load, color, cooking yield and C/PU value of the samples were investigated. To determine the effects of ohmic cooking on pathogenic bacteria, meatballs were inoculated with Salmonella enteridis at a 3 log CFU/g level. The ohmic cooking treatments completely eliminated Salmonella enteridis from the samples, while total mesophilic aerobic bacteria counts of meatballs reduced ranging from 2.41 to 3.35 log unit P>0.05 . Use of different central temperature affected the central color properties of the samples. There were significant differences in the a*, ∆C, Hue and chroma values of center of the samples P

Özet

Ohmik pişirmenin köfte örneklerinin mikrobiyal yükü, renk, pişme verimi, pişme değeri C ve pastörizasyon ünitesi PU değeri üzerine etkisini belirlemek üzere 15.26 V/cm voltaj gradyanı ile farklı merkez sıcaklıklarına 70, 75ve 80°C ulaşılana dek ohmik pişirme işlemi uygulanmıştır. Ohmik pişirmenin patojen mikroorganizmalar üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla köfte örnekleri Salmonella enteridis ile 3 log kob/g seviyesinde bulaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada uygulanan ohmik pişirme işleminin, köfte örneklerine inokule edilen Salmonella enteridis’i tamamen elimine ettiği, örneklerin toplam mezofilik bakteri sayısını ise 2,41-3,35 logaritmik birim azalttığı tespit edilmiştir P>0.05 . Farklı merkez sıcaklıkları kullanımının, örneklerin renk özelliklerini etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Örneklerde örnek içi a*, ∆C, Hue ve kroma değerleri arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu saptanmıştır P

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜN, İ. Y., İÇİER, F., YILDIZ-TURP, G., ARSERİM, E. H., KOR, G. (2013). Investigation of Ohmic Cooking Effectiveness of Meatballs Cooked to Different Final Temperatures. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 27–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/454782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. İçier, F., 2003. Gıdaların ohmik ısıtılmasının deneysel ve kuramsal olarak incelenmesi, Doktora tezi. Ege Universitesi, Izmir, 245 s
  2. Parrott, D.L., 1992. Use of ohmic heating for aseptic processing of food particulates. Food Technology 46: 68-72
  3. Sastry, S.K., 2008. Ohmic heating and moderate electric field processing. Food Science and Technology International 14(5): 419-422
  4. Anon., 2000. Kinetics of Microbial Inactivation for Alternative Food Processing Technologies. Research Needs. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition June 2, 2000. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/ift-need.html (Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2012)
  5. Anon., 2000. Kinetics of Microbial Inactivation for Alternative Food Processing Technologies.Ohmic and Inductive Heating. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition June 2, 2000. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/Researc hAreas/SafePracticesforFoodProcesses/ucm10015 8.htm (Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2012)
  6. Anon., 2008. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (NP 306), June 11, 2008, Breakout. www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Program/306/Com binedBreakoutSession2.doc (Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2012)
  7. Anon., 2005. Ohmic Heating of Foods. Ohio State University Extension Factsheet. http://ohioline.osu.edu/fse-fact/0004.html (Erişim tarihi: Kasım 2012)
  8. Aymerich, T., Picouet, P.A., Monfort, J.M., 2008. Decontamination technologies for meat products. Meat Science 78: 114-129
  9. ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods)., 1998. Meat and Meat Products. In T.A. Roberts, J.I. Pitt, J. Farkas, F.H. Grau, (Eds), Microorganisms in Foods, Vol.6, London, UK., Blackie Academic and Professional
  10. Ünlütürk, A., Turantaş, F., 1999. Et ve et ürünlerinde mikrobiyolojik bozulmalar, patojen mikroorganizmalar ve muhafaza yöntemleri, Ünlütürk, A. ve Turantaş, F. (Eds.), Gıda Mikrobiyolojisi, Mengi Tan Basımevi, İzmir, 263- 287s
  11. Somavat, R., Mohamed, H.M.H., Chung, Y.K., Yousef, A.E., Sastry, S.K., 2012. Accelerated inactivation of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores by ohmic heating. Journal of Food Engineering 108: 69-76
  12. Wang, W.C., Sastry, S.K., 2002. Effects of moderate electrothermal treatments on juice yield from cellular tissue. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 3: 371-377
  13. Castro, I., Teixeira, J.A., Salengke, S., Sastry, S