SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Romantikler, Ian McEwan ve yazarın kimliği

Romantics, Ian McEwan, and the identity of the author

Petru GOLBAN
Pages
215–226
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there are contemporary critical and literary voices, among whom Ian McEwan, who reaffirm the importance and omnipotence of the author against all emphases on textuality, the reader, and the cultural discourses by such critics as Wimsatt and Beardsley, Walter Benjamin, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault and others.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study explores the different conceptions regarding the status and role of the author in both literary practice and critical theory from the romantic period through the nineteenth-century to the contemporary reevaluation of the producer of the literary work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By its expressive theory of authorship, Romanticism marked the rise of the idea of the supremacy of the author, the idea being challenged and surpassed by the nineteenth-century critical opinions, whereas the twentieth century structuralist and post-structuralist points of view proclaimed the death of the author.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there are contemporary critical and literary voices, among whom Ian McEwan, who reaffirm the importance and omnipotence of the author against all emphases on textuality, the reader, and the cultural discourses by such critics as Wimsatt and Beardsley, Walter Benjamin, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault and others.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study explores the different conceptions regarding the status and role of the author in both literary practice and critical theory from the romantic period through the nineteenth-century to the contemporary reevaluation of the producer of the literary work. By its expressive theory of authorship, Romanticism marked the rise of the idea of the supremacy of the author, the idea being challenged and surpassed by the nineteenth-century critical opinions, whereas the twentieth century structuralist and post-structuralist points of view proclaimed the death of the author. However, there are contemporary critical and literary voices, among whom Ian McEwan, who reaffirm the importance and omnipotence of the author against all emphases on textuality, the reader, and the cultural discourses by such critics as Wimsatt and Beardsley, Walter Benjamin, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault and others.

Özet

Çalışma, Romantik dönemden on dokuzuncu yüzyıla, edebî eserin yaratıcısının çağdaş değerlendirmesine kadar,edebî uygulamada ve eleştiri teorisinde yazarın statüsü ve rolüyle ilgili farklı kavramları inceler. Romantizm, anlatımsal yazarlık teorisiyle yazarın üstünlüğü düşüncesinin yükselişini belirlemiştir. Bu düşünce, on dokuzuncu yüzyıl eleştirel fikirleri ile gölgede bırakılmış, yirminci yüzyıl yapısalcılık ve yapısalcılık sonrası savlar, yazarın ölümünü ilân etmiştir. Fakat, içlerinde Ian McEwan’ın da olduğu çağdaş eleştirel ve edebî düşünürler, Wimsatt ve Beardsley, Walter Benjamin, Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault gibi eleştirmenlerin metinsellik, okur ve kültürel söylemler üzerindeki vurguları karşısında yazarın önemini ve sınırsız gücünü doğrulamışlardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GOLBAN, P. (2022). Romantikler, Ian McEwan ve yazarın kimliği. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 215–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/454659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abrams, M. H. (1953). The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Barthes, R. (2000). “The Death of the Author”. Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge. London: Longman. Bennett, A. (2006). “Expressivity: the Romantic theory of authorship”. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Ed. Patricia Waugh. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Brooks, P. (ed.) (1997). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Cahoone, L. (ed.) (2003). From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Dyer, G. (2001). “Who’s Afraid of Influence?”. The Guardian. London, 22 September 2001, p. 8, http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2001/sep/22/fiction.ianmcewan. (10.08.2010).
  5. Foucault, M. (2000). “What Is an Author?”. Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge. London: Longman. Harland, R. (1999). Literary Theory from Plato to Barthes: An Introductory History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Macsiniuc, C. (2002). Towards a Poetics of Reading: Postructuralist Perspectives. Iasi: Institutul European. McEwan, I. (2001). Atonement. New York: Doubleday. Mullan, J. (2006). How Novels Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Rennison, N. (2006). Bloomsbury Good Reading Guide. London: Huntingdon. Scott, C. E. (2008). Living with Indifference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  7. Strong, J.; Dowd, G.; Stevenson, L. (2005). Genre Matters: Essays in Theory and Criticism. Bristol: Intellect Books. Vlad, E. (2005). Authorship and Identity in Contemporary Fiction. Constanţa: Ovidius University Press.
  8. Waugh, P. (ed.) (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.