Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2021 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Prediction Capability of Primary Models for Detection of Chicken Meat Spoilage

Tavuk Eti Bozulmasının Tespiti İçin Birincil Modellerin Tahmin Kabiliyetinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
1–9
Publication Date
2021-04-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prediction performance of the global models were evaluated with the rmax values that were independently published for aerobically-stored raw chicken meat, and RMSE values with lower than 5.11 × 10-2 revealed that one-step modelling approach can be reliably employed to predict TVC in aerobically-stored raw chicken meat.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of the present work is to compare the prediction capability of different primary models known as the modified Gompertz, modified logistic and Baranyi models to simulate the effect of temperature on aerobically-stored raw and marinated chicken meat spoilage using one-step modelling approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fitting capability of the global models was compared by taking into account root mean square error (RMSE) and adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted-R2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prediction performance of the global models were evaluated with the rmax values that were independently published for aerobically-stored raw chicken meat, and RMSE values with lower than 5.11 × 10-2 revealed that one-step modelling approach can be reliably employed to predict TVC in aerobically-stored raw chicken meat.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Global model · Mikrobiyolojik kalite · Çoğalma kinetiği

Abstract

The main objective of the present work is to compare the prediction capability of different primary models known as the modified Gompertz, modified logistic and Baranyi models to simulate the effect of temperature on aerobically-stored raw and marinated chicken meat spoilage using one-step modelling approach. For this purpose, total viable count (TVC) growth data were extracted from the published work for aerobically-stored raw and marinated chicken meat. The fitting capability of the global models was compared by taking into account root mean square error (RMSE) and adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted-R2). Statistical indices, RMSE and adjusted-R2 values were found to be maximum 0.299 and minimum 0.970, respectively for each of the primary models and both of the chicken products. The prediction performance of the global models were evaluated with the rmax values that were independently published for aerobically-stored raw chicken meat, and RMSE values with lower than 5.11 × 10-2 revealed that one-step modelling approach can be reliably employed to predict TVC in aerobically-stored raw chicken meat.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, depolama sıcaklığının aerobik olarak depolanan çiğ ve marine edilmiş tavuk eti bozulmasına etkisini tek adımlı modelleme yaklaşımı kullanarak simüle etmek için modifiye Gompertz, modifiye lojistik ve Baranyi modelleri olarak bilinen farklı birincil modellerin tahmin kabiliyetini karşılaştırmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, toplam canlı popülasyonu (TVC) çoğalma verileri, aerobik olarak depolanmış çiğ ve marine edilmiş tavuk eti için yayımlanmış çalışmadan elde edilmiştir. Global modellerin uydurma kabiliyeti, kök ortalama kare hatası (RMSE) ve düzeltilmiş belirleme katsayısı (düzeltilmiş-R2) dikkate alınarak karşılaştırıldı. İstatistiksel indeksler, RMSE ve düzeltilmiş-R2 değerleri, birincil modellerin her biri ve her iki tavuk ürünü için sırasıyla maksimum 0.299 ve minimum 0.970 olarak bulundu. Global modellerin tahmin performansı, aerobik olarak depolanan çiğ tavuk eti için farklı çalışmadan elde edilen rmax değerleri ile değerlendirildi ve 5.11 × 10-2'den küçük RMSE değerleri, aerobik olarak depolanan çiğ tavuk etindeki toplam canlı popülasyonunu tahmin etmek için tek adımlı modelleme yaklaşımının güvenilir bir şekilde kullanılabileceğini ortaya koydu.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARLAK, F. (2021). Comparison of Prediction Capability of Primary Models for Detection of Chicken Meat Spoilage. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 1–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/454527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Belitz, H.D., Grosch, W., Schieberle. P. (2009). Springer food chemistry 4th revised and extended edition. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 81, 79–655
  2. Grau R., Sánchez A.J., Girón J., Iborra E., Fuentes., A., Barat J.M. (2011). Nondestructive assessment of freshness in packaged sliced chicken breasts using SW-NIR spectroscopy. Food Research International, 44, 331–337
  3. Ghollasi-Mood F., Mohsenzadeh M., Hoseindokht M.R., Varidi M. (2017). Quality changes of air-packaged chicken meat stored under different temperature conditions and mathematical modelling for predicting the microbial growth and shelf life. Journal of Food Safety, 37, 12331
  4. Falkovskaya A., Gowen A. (2020). Literature review: spectral imaging applied to poultry products. Poultry Science, 99, 3709–3722
  5. Dominguez S.A., Schaffner D.W. (2007). Development and validation of a mathematical model to describe the growth of pseudomonas spp. in raw poultry stored under aerobic conditions. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 120, 287–295
  6. Lytou A., Panagou E.Z., Nychas G.J.E. (2016). Development of a predictive model for the growth kinetics of aerobic microbial population on pomegranate marinat ed chicken breast fillets under isothermal and dynamic temperature conditions. Food Microbiology, 55, 25–31
  7. Valero A., Pérez-Rodríguez F. (2013). Predictive Microbiology in Foods. Springer, New York
  8. Whiting R.C. (1995). Microbial modeling in foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 35, 467–494
  9. Ratkowsky D.A., Olley J., McMeekin T.A., Ball A. (1982). Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology, 149, 1–5
  10. Zwietering M.H., De Wit, J.C., Cuppers H.G.A.M., Van't Riet K. (1994). Modeling of bacterial growth with shifts in temperature. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60, 204–213
  11. Huang L. (2017). IPMP Global Fit–A one-step direct data analysis tool for predictive microbiology. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 262, 38–48
  12. Swinnen I.A.M., Bernaerts K., Dens E.J., Geeraerd A.H., Van Impe J.F. (2004). Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 94, 137–159
  13. Martino K.G., Marks B.P. (2007). Comparing uncertainty resulting from two-step and global regression procedures applied to microbial growth models. Journal of Food Protection, 70, 2811–2818
  14. Jewell K. (2012). Comparison of 1-step and 2-step methods of fitting