Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2022 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Vinegar Production Potential of Cardinal Grape, Napoleon Cherry, Damson Plum, Kiwi, and Peach Fruits by Natural Fermentation: Physicochemical and Sensorial Properties

Kardinal Üzümü, Napolyon Kirazı, Mürdüm Eriği, Kivi ve Şeftali Meyvelerinden Doğal Fermantasyonla Sirke Üretim Potansiyeli: Fizikokimyasal ve Duyusal Özellikler

Pages
54–62
Publication Date
2022-04-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the sensory evaluation test, the highest overall impression score among the samples was determined in KW vinegar, followed by SF and ER vinegars.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Vinegars are produced from different fruit sources to meet their increasing consumer demand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The acetic acid content of fruit vinegars was between 0.53-3.23%, and their pH values were between 2.93-3.63.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the sensory evaluation test, the highest overall impression score among the samples was determined in KW vinegar, followed by SF and ER vinegars.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Doğal fermantasyon · Meyve sirkeleri · Renk analizi

Abstract

Vinegars are produced from different fruit sources to meet their increasing consumer demand. In this study, five different fruit vinegars were produced by natural fermentation using Cardinal grape (KU), Napoleon cherry (KR), damson plum (ER), kiwi (KW), and peach (SF). Some physicochemical properties of vinegars such as their acetic acid content, pH, total soluble dry matter content, and color values and sensory characteristics were determined. The acetic acid content of fruit vinegars was between 0.53-3.23%, and their pH values were between 2.93-3.63. While the highest acetic acid content was found in KU vinegar, KR vinegar had the lowest acetic acid content. Besides, vinegars had a total soluble dry matter content between 2.50-3.70°Brix. While the lowest Brix value was determined in ER vinegar, KU and SF vinegars had the highest Brix value. Results of color profile analysis indicated that the brightest vinegars were KW, KU, and ER vinegars, and samples had a yellowness value between 13.19-26.60, and the highest redness value of 17.60 was found for KR vinegar. Based on the sensory evaluation test, the highest overall impression score among the samples was determined in KW vinegar, followed by SF and ER vinegars.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sirke üzerine artan tüketici talebini karşılamak amacıyla farklı meyve kaynaklarından geleneksel yöntemle üretilen sirkelerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, Kardinal üzümü (KU), Napolyon kirazı (KR), mürdüm eriği (ER), kivi (KW) ve şeftali (SF) kullanılarak geleneksel yöntemle beş farklı meyve sirkesi üretilmiştir. Örneklerin bazı fizikokimyasal özellikleri (asetik asit içeriği, pH’sı, toplam çözünür kuru madde içeriği ve renk değerleri) ve duyusal özellikleri incelenmiştir. Sirke örneklerinin asetik asit içeriği %0.53-3.23 arasında belirlenmiş olup, pH değerleri ise 2.93-3.63 arasında tespit edilmiştir. En yüksek asetik asit içeriği KU sirkesinde gözlemlenirken, KR sirkesinin ise en düşük asetik asit içeriğine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, örneklerin 2.50-3.70°Brix arasında toplam çözünür kuru madde içeriğine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. En düşük Brix değeri ER sirkesinde iken KU ve SF sirkelerinde en yüksek tespit edilmiştir. Renk profili analizi sonuçlarına göre, en parlak sirkeler KW, KU ve ER sirkeleri olmuş, örneklerin sarılık değeri 13.19-26.60 arasında bulunmuş ve en yüksek kırmızılık değeri ise 17.60 ile KR sirkesinde belirlenmiştir. Duyusal değerlendirme sonucuna göre örnekler arasında en yüksek genel izlenim skoru KW sirkesinde belirlenmiş olup bunu SF ve ER sirkeleri izlemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, H. İ. (2022). Vinegar Production Potential of Cardinal Grape, Napoleon Cherry, Damson Plum, Kiwi, and Peach Fruits by Natural Fermentation: Physicochemical and Sensorial Properties. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 54–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/454463

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bhat, S.V., Akhtar, R., Amin, T. (2014). An overview on the biological production of vinegar. International Journal of Fermented Foods, 3(2), 139-155
  2. Alimentarius, C. (2000). Proposed draft revised regional standard for vinegar. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, June 2000, Rome, Italy
  3. Lynch, K.M., Zannini, E., Wilkinson, S., Daenen, L., Arendt, E.K. (2019). Physiology of acetic acid bacteria and their role in vinegar and fermented beverages. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18(3), 587-625
  4. Wu, L.H., Lu, Z.M., Zhang, X.J., Wang, Z.M., Yu, Y.J., Shi, J.S., Xu, Z.H. (2017). Metagenomics reveals flavour metabolic network of cereal vinegar microbiota. Food Microbiology, 62, 23-31
  5. Yun, J., Zhao, F., Zhang, W., Yan, H., Zhao, F., Ai, D. (2019). Monitoring the microbial community succession and diversity of Liangzhou fumigated vinegar during solid-state fermentation with next-generation sequencing. Annals of Microbiology, 69(3), 279-289
  6. Bamforth, C.W. (2005). Vinegar. In: Food, Fermentation and Micro‐organisms, Edited by C.W. Bamforth, Blackwell Science, Kundli, India, 154-159
  7. Morales, L.M., González, G.A., Casas, J.A., Troncoso, A.M. (2001). Multivariate analysis of commercial and laboratory produced Sherry wine vinegars: influence of acetification and aging. European Food Research and Technology, 212(6), 676-682
  8. Jo, Y., Baek, J.Y., Jeong, I.Y., Jeong, Y.J., Yeo, S.H., Noh, B.S., Kwon, J.H. (2015). Physicochemical properties and volatile components of wine vinegars with high acidity based on fermentation stage and initial alcohol concentration. Food Science and Biotechnology, 24(2), 445-452
  9. Tesfaye, W., Morales, M.L., Garcı́a-Parrilla, M.C., Troncoso, A.M. (2002). Wine vinegar: technology, authenticity and quality evaluation. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 13(1), 12-21
  10. Al-Dalali, S., Zheng, F., Li, H., Huang, M., Chen, F. (2019). Characterization of volatile compounds in three commercial Chinese vinegars by SPME-GC-MS and GC-O. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 112, 108264
  11. Bayram, Y., Özkan, K., Sagdıc, O. (2020). Bioactivity, physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of vinegar made from persimmon (Diospyros kaki) peels. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(3), 1643-1652
  12. Vegas, C., Mateo, E., González, A., Jara, C., Guillamón, J.S., Poblet, M., Torija, M.J., Mas, A. (2010). Population dynamics of acetic acid bacteria du