SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2022 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

An Alternative Source for Sustainable Nutrition and Protein Needs: Synthetic Meat (Cultured Meat)

Sürdürülebilir Beslenme ve Protein İhtiyacı İçin Alternatif Bir Kaynak: Sentetik Et (Kültür Eti)

Mücahit MUSLU
Pages
189–193
Publication Date
2022-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review aims to present the latest situation with updated information about synthetic meat.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nutritional deficiencies increase with an increase in population worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to understand the synthetic meat issue clearly, studies in this field should be increased and legislation and policies should be developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review aims to present the latest situation with updated information about synthetic meat.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sentetik et · Kültür eti · Sürdürülebilir beslenme

Abstract

Nutritional deficiencies increase with an increase in population worldwide. They are important causes of diseases and deaths. Synthetic meat is among the future food sources for hunger prevention and sustainable nutrition. Synthetic meat is based on the reproduction of tissues from animals with advanced technology in a laboratory environment. In this way, it is thought that damages caused by the livestock sector to the environment and ethical problems resulting from slaughtering could be reduced. Although synthetic meat technology has improved, many issues have not been fully solved yet. Moreover, production of synthetic meats with desired flavor, texture and appearance have not been fully achieved. Producing this type of meats is very expensive. There are also other problems with the acceptance of this meat by communities for various sociocultural reasons. In order to understand the synthetic meat issue clearly, studies in this field should be increased and legislation and policies should be developed. This review aims to present the latest situation with updated information about synthetic meat.

Özet

Dünya genelinde artan nüfusla beraber beslenme yetersizlikleri de artmaktadır. Beslenme yetersizlikleri hastalıklar ve ölümlerin önemli nedenlerindendir. Sentetik et açlığın önlenmesi ve sürdürülebilir beslenme için geleceğe yönelik gıda kaynakları arasında gösterilmektedir. Sentetik et laboratuvar ortamında ileri teknoloji ile hayvanlardan alınan dokuların çoğaltılmasına dayanır. Bu sayede hayvancılık sektörünün çevreye vermiş olduğu zararların ve hayvanların kesilmesinden doğan etik sorunların azalacağı düşünülmektedir. Sentetik et teknolojisi gelişmekle beraber birçok konu tam anlamıyla aydınlatılamamıştır. Et üretim aşamasında istenen lezzet, doku ve görünüşe sahip etler tam olarak üretilememiştir. Üretilen etler ise çok pahalı olmaktadır. Aynı zamanda çeşitli sosyokültürel nedenlerle bu etin toplumlar tarafından kabulü konusunda sıkıntılar bulunmaktadır. Sentetik et konusunun net anlaşılabilmesi için bu alanda çalışmaların arttırılıp, mevzuat ve politikaların geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu derleme sentetik et konusunda güncel bilgilerle en son durumu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUSLU, M. (2022). An Alternative Source for Sustainable Nutrition and Protein Needs: Synthetic Meat (Cultured Meat). Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 189–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/454446

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. (2017). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2017. Building resilience for peace and food security, FAO, Rome
  2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423), New York
  3. Tobler, C., Visschers, V.H., Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57(3), 674-682
  4. Tiberius, V., Borning, J., Seeler, S. (2019). Setting the table for meat consumers: an international Delphi study on in vitro meat. NPJ Science of Food, 3(1), 1-6
  5. Bhat, Z.F., Kumar, S., Bhat, H.F. (2017). In vitro meat: A future animal-free harvest. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(4), 782-789
  6. Arshad, M.S., Javed, M., Sohaib, M., Saeed, F., Imran, A., Amjad, Z. (2017). Tissue engineering approaches to develop cultured meat from cells: a mini review. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 3(1), 1320814
  7. Bhat, Z.F., Kumar, S., Fayaz, H. (2015). In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(2), 241-248
  8. Schneider, Z. (2013). In vitro meat: Space travel, cannibalism, and federal regulation. Houston Law Review, 50, 991
  9. Benjaminson, M.A., Gilchriest, J.A., Lorenz, M. (2002). In vitro edible muscle protein production system (MPPS): Stage 1, fish. Acta Astronautica, 51(12), 879-889
  10. O’Riordan, K., Fotopoulou, A., Stephens, N. (2017). The first bite: Imaginaries, promotional publics and the laboratory grown burger. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 148-163
  11. Post, M.J. (2014). Cultured beef: medical technology to produce food. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(6), 1039-1041
  12. Post, M.J. (2012). Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Science, 92(3), 297-301
  13. Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A., Sexton, A. (2018). Bringing cultured meat to market: technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 78, 155-166
  14. Ghosh, P. (2013). World’s first lab-grown burger is eaten in London. BBC News, Available at: www. bbc. com/news/scienceenvironment-23576143 (Accessed: 08 April 2020)
  15. Hamdan, M.N., Post, M.J., Ramli, M.A., Mustafa, A.R. (2018). Cultured meat in Islamic perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 5