Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

The Relationships between Professional Ethical Standards, Corporate Social Responsibility Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour

Profesyonel Etik Standartlar, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Algısı ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkiler

Pages
2249–2263
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The adoption of professional ethical standards was found to have a direct positive impact on citizenship behaviour toward the organization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between employees’ adoption of professional ethical standards, their corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviours.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data for the research were collected from 211 employees of a private hospital in a province through face to face survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The adoption of professional ethical standards was found to have a direct positive impact on citizenship behaviour toward the organization.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationships between employees’ adoption of professional ethical standards, their corporate social responsibility perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviours. The data for the research were collected from 211 employees of a private hospital in a province through face to face survey. The data were analysed through structural equation modelling using LISREL 8.7 software. Findings showed that the adoption of professional ethical standards increase philanthropic responsibility perception. Also it was observed that employee’s economic, ethical and philanthropist responsibility perceptions had a significant and positive impact on his/her citizenship behaviour toward co-workers. On the other hand, employee’s legal responsibility perception positively affects citizenship behaviour toward the organization. The adoption of professional ethical standards was found to have a direct positive impact on citizenship behaviour toward the organization.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların profesyonel etik standartları benimseme düzeyi,kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algıları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkileriincelemektir. Araştırmada kullanılan veriler, bir ilimizdeki 211 özel hastane çalışanından yüz yüzeanket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler LISREL8.7 programı yardımıyla yapısal eşitlikmodellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Ulaşılan bulgular profesyonel etik standartları benimsemedüzeyinin gönüllü kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algısını artırdığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca ekonomik,etik ve gönüllü sosyal sorumluluk algısının çalışanın iş arkadaşlarına yönelik vatandaşlıkdavranışını artırdığı bulunmuştur. Yasal sorumluluk algısının ise örgüte yönelik vatandaşlıkdavranışlarını olumlu yönde etkilediği gözlenmiştir. Bunun yanında çalışanın profesyonel etikstandartları benimseme düzeyinin örgüte yönelik vatandaşlık davranışlarını doğrudan etkilediğide tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BATTAL, F., KARABEY, C. N. (2022). The Relationships between Professional Ethical Standards, Corporate Social Responsibility Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 2249–2263. https://ajindex.com/articles/454230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdullah, M. H., & Rashid, N. R. N. A. (2012). “The implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs and its impact on employee organizational citizenship behaviour”. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 2(1), 67-75.
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. (1988). “On the evaluation of structural equation model”. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  3. Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. With a Commentary by F. Ernest Johnson. New York. Bowen, R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper. Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). “Corporate social responsibility and resourcebased perspectives”. Journal of business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132.
  4. Carroll, A. B. (1979). “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance”. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.
  5. Carroll, A. B. (1991). “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  6. Chow, W., S., Chan, L. S. (2008). “Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing”. Information & Management, 45, 458–465.
  7. Commons, J. R. (1931). “Institutional economics”. The American Economic Review, 648-657.
  8. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). “How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
  9. Davis, K. (1960). “Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?”. California management review, 2(3), 70-76.
  10. Dean, P. J. (1997). “Examining the profession and the practice of business ethics”. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1637-1649.
  11. El Kassar, A. N., Yunis, M., & El-Khalil, R. (2017). “The Mediating Effects of Employee-Company Identification on the Relationship between Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour”. Journal of Promotion Management, 23(3), 419-436.
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors”. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 39–50.
  13. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Time Magazine, 13. Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178).
  14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Glazebrook, M. (1999). Corporate Citizenship and Acti