SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3-4

Effects of foreıgn dırect ınvestment on employment ın Turkey: Tıme serıes analysıs

Türkiye'de yabancı doğrudan yatırımların istihdama etkisi: Zaman serisi analizi ali rıza sandalcılar

Ali Rıza SANDALCILAR
Pages
273–286
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, "There is a positive relationship between the FDI inflow and employment.", the validity of this hypothesis has not been confirmed for Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the employment in Turkey has been analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis used data from the period 1980-2011, the ADF unit root test, the PP unit root test, Johansen cointegration test and Granger causality tests has been applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, "There is a positive relationship between the FDI inflow and employment.", the validity of this hypothesis has not been confirmed for Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the employment in Turkey has been analyzed. The analysis used data from the period 1980-2011, the ADF unit root test, the PP unit root test, Johansen cointegration test and Granger causality tests has been applied. According to analysis results, there is no a significant relationship between FDI inflow and employment in Turkey. In other words, "There is a positive relationship between the FDI inflow and employment.", the validity of this hypothesis has not been confirmed for Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiyede yabancı doğrudan yatırımların(YDY) istihdama etkisi analiz edilmiştir. 1980-2011 dönemi verilerinin kullanıldığı analizde ADF birim kök testi, PP birim kök testi, Johansen eşbütünleşme testi ve Granger nedensellik testleri yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, Türkiyede YDY girişi ile istihdam arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamaktadır. Bir diğer ifadeyle, YDY ile istihdam hacmi arasında pozitif ilişki vardır. hipotezin geçerliliği Türkiye için doğrulanamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANDALCILAR, A. R. (2022). Effects of foreıgn dırect ınvestment on employment ın Turkey: Tıme serıes analysıs. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3-4, 273–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/453647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Agarwal J.P. (1997) “Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Employment in Home Countries?”, Transnational Corporations, 6(2), ss.1-28.
  2. Ajaga, E. ve Nunnenkamp, P. (2008), “Inward FDI, Value Added and Employment in US States: A Panel Cointegration Approach”, Kiel Working Papers, 1420, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Aktar, I. ve Öztürk, L. (2009), “Can Unemployment be Cured by Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey?”, International Research of Finance and Economics, 27, ss.203-211.
  3. Andersen, P. S. ve Hainaut, P. (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment and Employment in the Industrial Countries”, BIS Working Papers, No.61. Bozkurt H. (2007),
  4. Zaman Serileri Analizi, Ekin Kitabevi,
  5. Bursa. Bülbül, O.G. ve Emirmahmutoğlu, F.(2010), “Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının İstihdam Etkisi: Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Örneği”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), ss.205-238.
  6. Chang, S.C. (2007), “The Interactions among Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth, Degree of Openness and Unemployment in Taiwan”, Applied Economics, 39(13), ss.1647-61.
  7. Dickey, D.A. ve W.A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4), ss.1057-1072.
  8. Dixit, A. (1997), “Investment and Employment Dynamics in the Short Run and the Long Run”, Oxford Economic Paper, 49(1), ss.1-20.
  9. Driehuis, W. ve Noord, P.J. (1988), “The Effects of Investment Subsidies on Employment”, Economic Modelling, 5(1), ss.32-40.
  10. DTP (2000),
  11. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları, ÖİKR:532, Ankara.
  12. Ekinci, A. (2011), “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Ekonomik Büyüme ve İstihdama Etkisi: Türkiye Uygulaması (1980-2010)”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), ss.71-96.
  13. Granger, C.W.J., (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), ss.424-438.
  14. Gujarati, D.N. (2004),
  15. Basic Econometrics, The MacGraw-Hill Companies. Gündoğan N. (2002),“Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve İstihdam Üzerine Etkileri”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, ss.71-83.
  16. Gürak, H. (2003), “Küreselleşme Nereye Gidiyor?”, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2, ss.1-22.
  17. Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, ss.231-254.
  18. Johansen, S. ve Juselius, K. (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Co-integration-with Applications to th