SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Methods of gingival retraction

Dişeti retraksiyon yöntemleri

Cem KURTOĞLU
Orhun ERKEN
Pages
78–84
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, practicability and reliability of gingival retraction methods are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The impression process for fixed prosthodontics requires careful management of the soft tissues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to insufficiency of impression materials in displacing soft tissue, adequate isolation is required in impression process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, practicability and reliability of gingival retraction methods are discussed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The impression process for fixed prosthodontics requires careful management of the soft tissues. Due to insufficiency of impression materials in displacing soft tissue, adequate isolation is required in impression process. Also some applications are necessary to expose the finish line temporarily during the impression process. Gingival retraction is an application which is realized during the impression process to enlarge the gingival sulcus and dilate the soft tissue temporarily. Thus a precise impression can be achieved. In this review, practicability and reliability of gingival retraction methods are discussed.

Özet

Sabit protez yapımında ölçü aşamaları, yumuşak dokuların dikkatli bir şekilde kontrolünü gerektirir. Ölçü maddelerinin, yumuşak dokuları, sıvıları veya artıkları uzaklaştırmadaki yetersizliği uygun yalıtım yöntemini zorunlu kılar. Ayrıca protez bitim çizgisinin açığa çıkarılması için ölçü işlemi sırasında ek uygulamalara gereksinim vardır. Dişeti retraksiyonu, serbest dişeti oluğunun geçici olarak genişletmek ve de serbest dişetinin geçici olarak büzülmesini sağlamak için ölçü işlemi sırasında gerçekleştirilen bir uygulamadır. Prepare dişin net bir ölçüsünün alınması için gereklidir. Bu derlemede, dişeti retraksiyon yöntemlerinin uygulanabilirliği ve güvenilirliği anlatılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTOĞLU, C., ERKEN, O. (2022). Methods of gingival retraction. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 78–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/452711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Shillingburg HT. Fundamental of Fixed Prosthodontics.3 ed Quintessence Publishing Co, London, 1997: 257-77
  2. Benson W, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA, Hoffman W. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:175-81
  3. Kamansky FW, Tempel TR, Post AC. Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:380-3
  4. Brady WF. Periodontal and restorative considerations in rotary gingival curettage. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;105:231-6
  5. Ingraham R, Sochat P, Hansing FJ. Rotary gingival curettage - A technique for tooth preparation and management of the gingival sulcus for impression taking. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1981;1:8-33
  6. Devitre R, Galburt RB, ManessWJ. Biometric comparison of bur and electrosurgical retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:179-82
  7. Azzi R, Tsao TF, Carranza FA Jr, Kenney EB. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:561-5
  8. Tupac RG, Neacy K. A comparison of cord gingival displacement with the gingitage technique. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:509-15
  9. Gardner FM. Electrosurgery retraction techniques in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:458
  10. Coelho DH, Cavallaro J, Rothschild EA. Gingival recession with electrosurgery for impression making. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:422-6
  11. Noble WH, McClatchey KD, Douglass GD. A histologic comparison of effects of electrosurgical resection using different electrodes. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:575
  12. Maness WL, Roeber FW, Clark RE, Cataldo E, Riis D, Haddad AW. Histologic evaluation of electrosurgery with varying frequency and waveform. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:304
  13. Csempesz F, Vag J, Fazekas A. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:45-9
  14. Azzi R, Tsao TF, Carranza FA Jr, Kenney EB. Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:561-5
  15. DonovanTE, Gandar BK, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:525-31
  16. Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, Boyacioglu H. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. Quintessence Int 2007;38:92-8
  17. Csillag M, Nyiri G, Vag J, Fazekas A. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:6-11
  18. Bader JD, Bonito AJ, Shugars DA. A systematic review of cardiovascular effects