Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Precision attachments

Hassas bağlantılar

Pages
111–120
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review study is intended to guide the clinicians by classifying the precision attachments and defining clinical situations of precision attachments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Precision attachment-retained removable partial dentures are alternative to the clasp retained removable partial dentures especially in the anterior regions where the esthetics is a primary concern.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tochoose a proper attachment for any case is aconfusing and challenging process for the clinician.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review study is intended to guide the clinicians by classifying the precision attachments and defining clinical situations of precision attachments.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Precision attachment-retained removable partial dentures are alternative to the clasp retained removable partial dentures especially in the anterior regions where the esthetics is a primary concern. Tochoose a proper attachment for any case is aconfusing and challenging process for the clinician. Anatomical structures, oral hygiene, biomechanical factors, psychological conditions and economic factors of the patient closely effect the selection. Although there is not empirical evidence that one attachment system is better, there are lots of disadvantages and advantages to each other. Nevertheless, attachments can provide an effective response to prosthesis stability and retention in a way that is cosmetically pleasing. This review study is intended to guide the clinicians by classifying the precision attachments and defining clinical situations of precision attachments.

Özet

Hassas bağlantılı protezler özellikle üst çenede gülme hattı içerisinde kalan diş eksikliklerinde, geleneksel krose tutuculu protezlere alternatif oluştururlar. Hassas bağlantıların seçimi genellikle hekimlerin karar vermekte zorlandığı konuların başında gelmektedir. Ağız hijyeni, dayanak diş konumu ve ekseni, kron boyu çeneler arası ilişki gibi anatomik koşullar, biyomekanik etkenler, hastanın psikolojik durumu, beklentileri ve ekonomik koşulları verilecek kararı belirleyen faktörlerdir. Hassas bağlantıların birbirlerine göre avantaj ve dezavantajları mevcuttur ancak birbirlerine üstünlükleri kesin olarak gösterilememiştir. Bununla birlikte hassas bağlantılar protezin stabilitesine ve estetik gereksinimler doğrultusunda katkı sağlayabilir. Bu derleme hassas bağlantıları sınıflayarak ve klinik kullanım alanlarını belirterek klinisyene hassas bağlantı seçiminde rehberlik etmesi için hazırlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTOĞLU, C., ERKEN, O. (2022). Precision attachments. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 111–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/452703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT. McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics, 11 ed, Mosby Inc, St. Louis, 2005: 8-11
  2. McCord JF, Grey NJ, Winstanley RB, Johnson A. A clinical overview of removable prostheses: 1. Factors to consider in planning a removable partial denture. Dent Update. 2002;29(8):376-381
  3. Mensor MC. Removable partial overdentures with mechanical (precision) attachments. Dent Clin North Am. 1990;34(4):669-81
  4. Misch CE, Dental Implant Prosthodontics, 1 ed, Mosby Inc, St.Louis, 2005:4-5
  5. Budtz-Jørgensen E, Bochet G, Grundman M, Borgis S. Aesthetic considerations for the treatment of partially edentulous patients with removable dentures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000;12(8):765-72
  6. Burns DR, Ward JE. A review of attachments for removable partial denture design: Part 1Classification and selection. Int J Prosthodont.1990;3(2):98-102
  7. Burns DR, Ward JE. A review of attachments for removable partial denture design: Part 2. Treatment planning and attachment selection. Int J Prosthodont.1990;3(2):169-74
  8. Ku YC, Shen YF, Chan CP. Extracoronal resilient attachments in distal-extension removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(5):311-7
  9. Wolfe RE. Symposium on semiprecision attachments in removable partial dentures. Extracoronal attachments. Dent Clin North Am.1985;29(1):185-98
  10. Phoenix RD, Cagna DR, DeFreest CF. Stewart’s Clinical Removable Partial Prosthodontics, 3 ed, Quintessence Publiching Co Inc, Chicago, 2003:507-515
  11. Van Kampen FM, Van der Bilt A, Cune MS, Bosman F, The influence of various attachment types in mandibular ımplant- retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. J Dent Res 2002; 81(3):170-173
  12. Preiskel HW. Precision Attachments in Dentistry, 2 ed, Mosby, Saint Louis, 1973:37-40
  13. Wang Y, Mi N, Qing F, Liu F, Chen J. Surface stress analysis of distal extension removable partial denture retained with two types of semiprecision attachments. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001;19(5):283-6 14. Saito M, Miura Y, Notani K, Kawasaki T. Stres distribution of abutments and base displacement with precision attachment- and telescopic crownretained removable partial denturs. J Oral Rehab2003;30:482-487
  14. Chou T-M, Caputo AA, Moore DJ, Xiao B. Photoelastic analysis and comparison of forcetransmission characteristics of intracoronal attachments with clasp distal-extension removable partial dentures, J Prosthet Dent1989;62(3): 313-319
  15. Becerra G, MacEntee M. A classificatio