Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of effecting factors of denture cleanliness in patients wearing complete denture

Tam protez hastalarında protez temizlik düzeylerini etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
8–13
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To prevent this condition of patients who wearing complete denture should be given more weight to giving information and motivating about denture cleanliness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purporese: The prosthesis was an adequate area for adhesion of microorganisms, and the first step for adhesion was insufficient denture cleanliness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This study was included total 161 patients who applied to prosthodontic department of GATA Haydarpaşa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To prevent this condition of patients who wearing complete denture should be given more weight to giving information and motivating about denture cleanliness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purporese: The prosthesis was an adequate area for adhesion of microorganisms, and the first step for adhesion was insufficient denture cleanliness. This study was carrying out detected factors of effected denture cleanliness in patients wear complete denture. Material and Methods: This study was included total 161 patients who applied to prosthodontic department of GATA Haydarpaşa. The denture cleanliness was scored as follows; Score 1 was clean, Score 2 was dirty and Score 3 was extremely dirty. Results: The results were shown that 34.8% of all patients were wearing extremely dirty complete denture. The Chi-square test results were shown that there was a statistically significant relationship between denture cleanliness score and sexuality, educational status, with/without education for denture cleanliness, denture age, cleanliness method, and cleanliness frequencies.Cunslusion: In this study, the results were shown that patients wear complete denture have insufficient denture cleanliness and used dirty or extremely dirty denture. To prevent this condition of patients who wearing complete denture should be given more weight to giving information and motivating about denture cleanliness.

Özet

Amaç: Mikroorganizmaların yerleşimi açısından protezler ideal bir alan oluşturmaktadır ve yerleşimin temel basamağı da yetersiz protez hijyenidir. Bu araştırma; tam protez hastalarında protez temizlik düzeylerini etkileyen faktörleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.Gereç ve Yöntem: GATA Haydarpaşa Eğitim Hastanesi Diş Servisi Protez bölümüne başvuran toplam 161 tam protez hastası bu araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Hastalara ait protez temizlik düzeyleri şu şekilde skorlanmıştır; Skor 1 temiz, Skor 2 kirli, Skor 3 çok kirli. Bulgular: Sonuçlar hastaların %34.8’nin çok kirli protezler kullandığını gösterdi. Ki-Kare testi, protez temizlik skorları; cinsiyet, eğitim durumu, protez temizliği hakkında bilgi alma durumu, protez kullanım süresi, protez temizleme şekli ve sıklığının dağılımı arasında istatistiksel olarak çok önemli bir ilişki bulunduğunu gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TUKAY, A., ORUÇ, S., AKYIL, M. Ş., AKOVA, T., GÜNAY, Y., ATAY, A. (2022). Evaluation of effecting factors of denture cleanliness in patients wearing complete denture. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 8–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/452693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Jagger DC, Harrison A. Denture cleansing--the best approach. Br Dent J 1995;178(11):413-7
  2. Murtomaa H, Kononen M, Laine P. Age and maintenance of removable dentures in Finland. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19(2):123-8
  3. Schou L, Wight C, Cumming C. Oral hygiene habits, denture plaque, presence of yeasts and stomatitis in institutionalised elderly in Lothian, Scotland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15(2):85-9
  4. Tarbet WJ, Axelrod S, Minkoff S, Fratarcangelo PA. Denture cleansing: A comparison of two methods. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(3):322-5
  5. Budtz-Jorgensen E, Mojon P, Rentsch A, Deslauriers N. Effects of an oral health program on the occurrence of oral candidosis in a long-term care facility. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28(2):141-9
  6. Hoad-Reddick G, Grant AA, Griffiths CS. Investigation into the cleanliness of dentures in an elderly population. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(1):48-52
  7. Kulak-Ozkan Y, Kazazoglu E, Arikan A. Oral hygiene habits, denture cleanliness, presence of yeasts and stomatitis in elderly people. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29(3):300-4
  8. Budtz-Jorgensen E, Stenderup A, Grabowski M. An epidemiologic study of yeasts in elderly denture wearers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1975;3(3):115-9
  9. Collis JJ, Stafford GD. A survey of denture hygiene in patients attending Cardiff Dental Hospital. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1994;3(2):67-71
  10. Moskona D, Kaplan I. Oral lesions in elderly denture wearers. Clin Prev Dent 1992;14(5):11-4
  11. Abelson DC. Denture plaque and denture cleansers. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45(4):376-9
  12. Nakamoto K, Tamamoto M, Hamada T. In vitro study on the effects of trial denture cleansers with berberine hydrochloride. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(6):530-3
  13. Akpan A, Morgan R. Oral candidiasis. Postgrad Med J 2002;78(922):455-9
  14. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995;49:711-45
  15. Keng SB, Lim M. Denture plaque distribution and the effectiveness of a perborate-containing denture cleanser. Quintessence Int 1996;27(5):341-5
  16. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284(5418):1318-22
  17. Donlan RM. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7(2):277-81
  18. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15(2):167-93
  19. Douglas LJ. Candida biofilms and their role in i