Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Orthodontic and prosthodontic approach to a patient with hypodontia, conical tooth anomaly and class II malocclusion

Sınıf 2 malokluzyon konik diş anomalisi ve hipodontiye sahip bir hastaya ortodontik ve protetik yaklaşım

Pages
198–202
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that a successful esthetic appearance could not be obtained with orthodontic intervention without prosthodontic treatment, so a treatment planned orthodontic and prosthodontic clinics performed together.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An 14 year-old female patient applied to the Orthodontic Department of the Faculty of Dentistry at Atatürk University because of the esthetic reasons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After clinical and radiographical examinations, it had been observed that upper right lateral incisor had a conical tooth anomaly and upper left lateral incisor had absent congenitally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that a successful esthetic appearance could not be obtained with orthodontic intervention without prosthodontic treatment, so a treatment planned orthodontic and prosthodontic clinics performed together.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An 14 year-old female patient applied to the Orthodontic Department of the Faculty of Dentistry at Atatürk University because of the esthetic reasons. After clinical and radiographical examinations, it had been observed that upper right lateral incisor had a conical tooth anomaly and upper left lateral incisor had absent congenitally. It was concluded that a successful esthetic appearance could not be obtained with orthodontic intervention without prosthodontic treatment, so a treatment planned orthodontic and prosthodontic clinics performed together. Fixed orthodontic treatment was applied to the patient and after orthodontic treatment upper right lateral incisor was restorated with full ceramic crown while absent upper left lateral incisor was restorarted with inlay bridge.

Özet

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti kliniğine estetik nedenlerle 14 yaşında bayan bir hasta başvurdu. Klinik ve radyografik muayene sonucunda sol üst yan kesici dişinin konjenital olarak olmadığı ve sağ üst yan kesici dişinin ise konik formda olduğu görüldü. Protetik tedavi uygulanmadan yapılacak bir ortodontik tedavinin istenilen estetik sonucu veremeyeceği belirlendi ve ortodonti ve protez kliniklerinin beraber yürüteceği bir tedavi planlandı. Hastaya sabit ortodontik tedavi uygulandı ve ortodontik tedavi sonrası üst sağ lateral diş tam seramik kuron ile restore edilirken eksik olan üst sol lateral diş ise inley köprü ile restore edildi

🔖

Cite This Article

KAZANCI, F., KARAALİOĞLU, O. F. (2022). Orthodontic and prosthodontic approach to a patient with hypodontia, conical tooth anomaly and class II malocclusion. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 198–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/452672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Glenn FB. Incidence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in a private pedodontic practice. J Dent Child 1961;28:317-320
  2. Kotsomitis N, Freer TJ. Inherited dental anomalies and abnormalities. J Dent Child 1997:405-408
  3. Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. “Konik diş anomalisi” bulunan üç farklı olgunun, kompozit veneer restorasyonlarla estetik ve fonksiyonel tedavisi (olgu bildirimi). A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32: 215-221
  4. Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. The C. V. Mosby Company 2001:697-706, 643-672 5. Edelhoff D, JA S. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:241-249
  5. Cronin RJ, Cagna DR. An update on fixed prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:425-436
  6. Shillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Co 1997
  7. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-320
  8. Spalding PM, Cohen BD. Orthodontic adjunctive treatment in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:607-629
  9. Ramford S, Ash M. Occlusion. WB Saunders Co Philadelphia,3. edd. 1983:314-315
  10. Lutz F, Gohring TN. Fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: maximum preservation of dental hard tissue. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:164-171
  11. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-509
  12. Crispin BJ. Contemporary esthetic dentistry: practice fundementals. Quintessence Publishing Co 1994;6.bölüm:297-299
  13. Serdar Cotert H, Ozturk B. Posterior bridges retained by resin-bonded cast metal inlay retainers: a report of 60 cases followed for 6 years. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:697-704
  14. Isidor F, Stokholm R. Resin-bonded prostheses for posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:239-243
  15. Gohring TN, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: preliminary results after one year. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:662-668
  16. Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2001;32:269-281
  17. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:167-171. 19