SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

AN INTRODUCTION TO SOME USEFUL SCALES TO MEASURE ORAL HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN EARLY ADOLESCENCE (11-14 YEARS OF AGE)

ERKEN ADÖLESAN (11-14 YAŞ) DÖNEMDEKİ ÇOCUKLARDA AĞIZ SAĞLIĞINA BAĞLI YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİNDE KULLANILABİLECEK ÖLÇEKLER

Fatih KAZANCI
Dt Cihan AYDOĞAN
Pages
408–414
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to present general information on existing criteria for oral health related quality of life measures and to introduce the most commonly used tools to evaluate oral health related quality of life in early adolescence which are the “Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14” , the “Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performance” (C-OIDP) and the “Child Oral Health Impact Profile” (COHIP)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is known that clinical measures that are routinely used in dentistry are not sufficiently representative for the effects of diseases on patients' daily living just as many clinical measures in other medical subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consequently, “Oral Health Related Quality of Life” (OHRQoL) concept and measurements gained more importance nowadays.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to present general information on existing criteria for oral health related quality of life measures and to introduce the most commonly used tools to evaluate oral health related quality of life in early adolescence which are the “Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14” , the “Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performance” (C-OIDP) and the “Child Oral Health Impact Profile” (COHIP)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is known that clinical measures that are routinely used in dentistry are not sufficiently representative for the effects of diseases on patients' daily living just as many clinical measures in other medical subjects. Consequently, “Oral Health Related Quality of Life” (OHRQoL) concept and measurements gained more importance nowadays. The necessity of measuring children's oral health related quality of life was also realized in recent years and today the number of studies being conducted on these populations are growing. The aim of this review is to present general information on existing criteria for oral health related quality of life measures and to introduce the most commonly used tools to evaluate oral health related quality of life in early adolescence which are the “Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14” , the “Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performance” (C-OIDP) and the “Child Oral Health Impact Profile” (COHIP)

Özet

Tüm tıp dallarında olduğu gibi diş hekimliği alanında ağız hastalıklara dair yapılan klinik ölçümlerin hastaların günlük yaşantıları üzerine olan etkilerini tam olarak göstermediği bilinmektedir. Bu nedenle "Ağız Sağlığına Bağlı Yaşam Kalitesi" (ASBYK) kavramı ve ölçümleri günümüzde daha fazla önem kazanmıştır. Geçtiğimiz yıllar içerisinde çocuklarda da ağız sağlığına bağlı yaşam kalitesi ölçümlerinin gerekliliği anlaşılmış ve günümüzde konu ile ilgili araştırmaların sayısında artış olduğu görülmektedir. Bu derlemede ağız sağlığına bağlı yaşam kalitesi ölçeklerinin sahip olması gereken özellikler ve erken adölesan dönemde ağız sağlığına bağlı yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesinde literatürde en sık kullanılan ölçekler olan "Çocuk Algıları Ölçeği 11-14" , "Çocuklarda Ağız Sağlığının Günlük Aktivitelere Etkisi" (C-OIDP) ve "Çocuk Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profili" (COHIP) ölçekleri hakkında bilgi sunulması amaçlanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KAZANCI, F., AYDOĞAN, D. C. (2022). AN INTRODUCTION TO SOME USEFUL SCALES TO MEASURE ORAL HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN EARLY ADOLESCENCE (11-14 YEARS OF AGE). Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 408–414. https://ajindex.com/articles/452126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of Quality-ofLife Outcomes. New Engl. Journal of Med. 1996;334:835–40
  2. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129– 36
  3. WHO. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2:153–9
  4. Cunningham S, Hunt N. Quality of life and its importance in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2001;28:152–8
  5. Albrecht G, Devlieger P. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:977–88
  6. Inglehart M. Oral health related quality of life: An introduction. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2002
  7. Broder HL. Children’s oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35 Suppl 1:5–7
  8. Miloğlu Ö, Çağlyan F, Kazancı F, Altun O, Kaya M. Türk çocuklarında ortodontik tedavi ihtiyacı ve yaĢam kalitesi arasındaki iliĢkinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv DiĢ Hek Fak Derg. 2009;19:8–13
  9. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-healthrelated quality of life. J Dent Res. 2002;81:459–63
  10. Theunissen NC, Vogels TG, Koopman HM, et al. The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:387–97
  11. Eiser C, Morse R. Can parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:347–57
  12. Verrips GH, Vogels AG, den Ouden AL, Paneth N, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents: agreement between raters and between methods of administration. Child Care Health Dev. 2000;26:457–69
  13. Guyatt G, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring healthrelated quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622–9
  14. Turgut F, Baykul Y. Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. 6. baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2014
  15. Büyüköztürk ġ, Kılıç Çakmak E, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz ġ, Demirel F. Bilimsel AraĢtırma Yöntemleri. 18. baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2014
  16. Allen M, Yen W. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Long Grove: Waveland Press Inc; 2002
  17. DeVellis RF. Scale Development. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2003
  18. Polit DF. Getting serious about test-retest reliability: A critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1713– 20
  19. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: A