Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Işıkla sertleşen farklı ortodontik yapıştırıcıların bağlanma dirençlerinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of shear bond strength of different light cure orthodontics adhesives

Pages
84–88
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present findings indicated that the mean bond strength of two light cure adhesives ranged between 15.21 and 16.39 MPa while mean bond strength of reinforced glass ionomer cement was 7.16 MPa.The results of variance analysis showed that there were statistical significant differences in the bond strength among the 3 groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aims of the current study were to evaluate and compare bond strength of two conventional light -cure adhesives and one reinforced glass ionomer cement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty extracted human premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present findings indicated that the mean bond strength of two light cure adhesives ranged between 15.21 and 16.39 MPa while mean bond strength of reinforced glass ionomer cement was 7.16 MPa.The results of variance analysis showed that there were statistical significant differences in the bond strength among the 3 groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aims of the current study were to evaluate and compare bond strength of two conventional light -cure adhesives and one reinforced glass ionomer cement. Thirty extracted human premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups. Premolar brackets were bonded to the tooth specimens in each group with their respective adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions. All specimens were stored in distilled water in sealed containers and placed in an incubator at 37° C for 24 hours before shear bond strengths were tested. Analysis of variance was used to compare the three adhesives. A One-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison test were used to determine statistical significance differences between groups. The present findings indicated that the mean bond strength of two light cure adhesives ranged between 15.21 and 16.39 MPa while mean bond strength of reinforced glass ionomer cement was 7.16 MPa.The results of variance analysis showed that there were statistical significant differences in the bond strength among the 3 groups. Tukey multiple comparison test indicated that these differences took root from reinforced glass ionomer cement which has the weakest bond strength in our study. It was concluded that adhesives tested in this study would be adequate for routine clinical use.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki adet ışıkla sertleşen adeziv ve bir adet güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer simanın bağlanma dirençlerinin belirlenmesi ve birbirleriyle karşılaştırılmasıdır. 30 adet çekilmiş insan küçük azı dişi rastgele 3 gruba ayrılmış ve küçük azı braketleri üretici firmaların kullanma talimatlarına göre çekilen dişlere yapıştırılmıştır. Tüm örnekler sıyrılma dirençleri test edilmeden 24 saat önce 37 derecelik distile suda bekletilmiştir. İstatistiksel değerlendirme için One-way ANOVA varyans analizi ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılmıştır. Işıkla sertleşen iki adet adezivin ortalama bağlanma dirençleri 15.21 ile 16.39 MPa iken güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer simanın bağlanma direnci 7.16 MPa olarak bulunmuştur.Vayans analizi sonuçları 3 grup adezivin bağlanma dirençleri arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılık olduğunu göstermiştir. Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi farklılıkların en zayıf bağlanma direncine sahip olan güçlendirilmiş cam iyonomer simandan kaynaklandığını göstermiştir. Bu çalışmada kullanılan adezivlerin rutin klinik kullanım için yeterli olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HALICIOĞLU, K., YILMAZ, B., YAVUZ, İ. (2022). Işıkla sertleşen farklı ortodontik yapıştırıcıların bağlanma dirençlerinin karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 84–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/452668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Buonocore, MG. A Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Dent Res 1955
  2. Newman, G. V. Snyder, WH, Wilson, CW. Acrylic adhesives for bonding attachments to tooth surfaces. Angle Orthod 1968
  3. Retief DH, Dreyer G, Gavron G. The direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth by means of an epoxy resin adhesive. Am J Orthod 1970
  4. Cueto HI. A little bit of history
  5. the first direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990
  6. 77, 5.Mitchell DL.The first direct bonding in orthodontia, revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992
  7. Newman GV. First direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992
  8. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998
  9. Brown CRL, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978
  10. Rouleau BD, Marshall GW, Cooly RO. Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1982
  11. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: A study with the scanning electron microscope. Am 3 Orthod 1981
  12. Brannström M, Malmgrerı O, Nordevall KJ. Etching of young permanent teeth with an acid gel. Am J Orthod 1982
  13. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends I Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988
  14. Gorelick L. Bonding metal brackets with self-polymerizing seakent composite: a 12 month assessment. Am J Orthod 1977
  15. Tavas A, Watts DC. Banding of orthodontic brackets by transilluminatian of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979
  16. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Brit Dent J 1972
  17. White LW. Glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod 1986
  18. 91 17.Itoh T, Matsuo N, Fukushima T, Inoue Y, Oniki Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Effect of contamination and etching on enamel bond strength of new light-cured glass ionomer cements. Angle Orthod 1999
  19. Cook PA. Direct bonding with glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod 1990
  20. Fajen VB, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Angolker PV. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of thr