SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Relation between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica and skeletal anomaly

Sella tursikanın köprülenmesi ve boyutları ile iskeletsel anomaliler arasındaki ilişki

Gülsüm YOLCU
Koray HALICIOĞLU
İbrahim YAVUZ
Pages
177–180
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggest that there is no significant difference in sella turcica dimensions and bridging between groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of sella turcica bridging and sella turcica dimensions in subjects with severe skeletal anomalies, and to compare their sella turcica dimensions with a normal occlusion group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The material of this study consisted of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 60 subjects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggest that there is no significant difference in sella turcica dimensions and bridging between groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of sella turcica bridging and sella turcica dimensions in subjects with severe skeletal anomalies, and to compare their sella turcica dimensions with a normal occlusion group. The material of this study consisted of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 60 subjects. A sella turcica bridge was identified as a continuous band of bony tissue extending from the anterior cranial fossa to the posterior cranial fossa.One–Way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used to compare groups. In Class I and Class III subjects, incidence of sella turcica bridging were 5 %, whereas it was 10 % in the Class II subjects. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the rate of bridging. Width of sella turcica, and interclinoid distance were greater in Class III subjects than other groups. These results suggest that there is no significant difference in sella turcica dimensions and bridging between groups.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı şiddetli iskeletsel anomaliye (Sınıf II ve Sınıf III) sahip bireylerde sella tursikanın boyutlarının ve köprülenmesinin değerlendirilmesi ve normal oklüzyonlu bireylerle karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışmanın materyalini 60 bireyin lateral sefalometrik filmi oluşturmaktadır. Sella tursika köprülenmesi anterior kraniyal fossadan posterior kraniyal fossaya uzanan zayıf bir doku devamlılığı olarak tanımlanmıştır.Grupların değerlendirilmesinde One-Way ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testleri kullanılmıştır. Sella tursika köprülenmesi Sınıf I ve Sınıf III bireylerin % 5 inde, Sınıf II bireylerin ise % 10 unda tespit edilmiştir. Sınıf III bireylerde sella tursikanın genişliğinin ve interklenoid uzaklığın daha büyük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlar gruplar arasında sella tursika boyutları ve köprülenmesi yönünden önemli farklılık olmadığını ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YOLCU, G., HALICIOĞLU, K., YAVUZ, İ. (2022). Relation between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica and skeletal anomaly. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 177–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/452670

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Becktor JP, Einersen S, Kjaer I. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with severe craniofacial deviations. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:69-74
  2. Camp JD. The normal and pathologic anatomy of the sella turcica as revealed at necropsy. Radiology 1923;1:65-73
  3. Bergland RM, Ray BS, Torack RM. Anatomical variations in the pituitary gland and adjacent structures in 225 human autopsy cases. J Neurosurg 1968;28:93-99
  4. Carstens M. Die selladiagnostik. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen 1949;71:257-272
  5. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, Moos KF, McHugh S. Bridging And Dimensions Of Sella Turcica in Subjects Treated By Surgical-Orthodontic Means or Orthodontics Only. Eur J Orthod 2005;75:714-718
  6. Taveras JM, Wood EH. Diagnostic Neuroradiology. MD: Williams & Wilkins Co 1964
  7. Björk A. Cranial base development: A follow-up x-ray study of the individual variation in growth occurring between the ages of 12 and 20 years and its relation to brain case and face development. Am J Orthod 1955;41:198-225 8. Melsen B. The cranial base. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1974;32: suppl 62,1-126
  8. Muller F. Sella turcica bridge and its importance for the eye. Klin Monatsblatter Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild 1952;120:298-302
  9. Platzer W. Zur anatomie der ‘‘sellabrucke’’ und ihrer bezeihung zur A. carotis interna. Fortsch Geb Roentgen Nuklear 1957;87:613-616
  10. Lang J. Structure and postnatal organization of heretofore uninvestigated and infrequent ossifications of the sella turcica region. Acta Anat 1977;99:121-139
  11. Lang J, Tisch-Rottensteiner KF. Form and form variations of the sella turcica. Verh Anat Ges 1977;71:1279-1282
  12. Weisberg LA, Zimmerman EA, Frantz A. Diagnosis and evaluation of patients with enlarged sella. Am J Med 1976;61:590-596
  13. Teal JS. Radiology of the adult sella turcica. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 1977;42:111-174
  14. Weisberg LA. Asymptomatic enlargement of the sella turcica. Arch Neurol 1975;32:483-485.